Channel
@sorazvitieru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
434subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001110975107 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sorazvitieru |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sorazvitieru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:26 | 434 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 435 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 434 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 432 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 432 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 16 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
59 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 54.2% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 16.9% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 10.2% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 8.47% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 4 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что скрывает первая консультация? Первая встреча с клиентом похожа на айсберг. Над водой его запрос: «хочу больше денег», «надоели ссоры», «помогите решиться». Под водой детские травмы, страхи и решения, принятые в пять лет. Если работать только с видимой частью эффект будет временным. Клиент уйдёт, а проблема вернётся. Эннеаграмма - это карта глубин. Определив тип личности, вы за одну сессию узнаёте: — чего челов…
🔥2❤1
9 языков доверия В прошлый раз говорили о том, что за одинаковым поведением стоят разные мотивы. Теперь важнее: как это знание превратить в доверие. У каждого из 9 типов личности —свой «язык безопасности». Слова и интонации, на которые человек откликается. И те, после которых он закрывается намертво. Например: 🗣 Тип 6 (Скептик) доверяет, когда вы честны о рисках, даёте опору и план. Ложная бодрость его пугает. 🗣 Т…
❤4🔥2🎉1💯1
Центр «Со-Развитие» | Обучение | Доп. Образование | Профессиональная переподготовка pinned a photo
«Точка слепоты» Самый опасный враг в работе с людьми не возражения. Не конкуренты. Даже не отсутствие клиентов. Это иллюзия, что вы понимаете человека. Мы считываем поведение и додумываем мотив Опоздал значит, не ценит. Молчит значит, обиделся. Спорит значит, хочет задеть. А что, если нет? Эннеаграмма учит одному важному навыку: отличать поведение от истинной мотивации. Оказывается, внешне одинаковые поступки у р…
❤3🔥3
Мак-понедельник!
❤4🎉1
Вы где?
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤2🎉2
Тут ещё есть кто?
❤1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁3👏1🔥1
Всем продуктивного понедельника! Давайте разнообразим нашу МАК-рубрику ❤️🔥 Пишите запрос и любое число, пришлю карту Можно просто число, если запрос личный Только сегодня до 00 📆
❤2👍1
Участвуйте в опросе!
Следующая очная программа
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Друзья, нам важно ваше слово! ПРОХОДИТЕ ОПРОС 📋✅ Наши ученики - это сердце Центра «Со-Развитие». Именно вы чувствуете, куда двигаться дальше, что актуально, а что - нет. Сейчас мы формируем сетку очных программ (с онлайн-трансляциями) на ближайшее будущее. И хотим спросить у тех, кто уже учился у нас: Какая следующая программа вам интересна? Вот наши «козыри» выбирайте ту, что откликается именно вам: 1. Тренинг …
👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @sorazvitieru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вы где?
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Следующая очная программа
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 4 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Центр «Со-Развитие» | Обучение | Доп. Образование | Профессиональная переподготовка” (@sorazvitieru), 434 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sorazvitieru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.