Channel photo updated

Channel
SOPRIVATECALLS
@soprivatecalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002132916519 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @soprivatecalls |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 13 February 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/soprivatecalls |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 8 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 11 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:50 | 11 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 33s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 5 | 38.5% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 30.8% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 30.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2024 to 1 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
I’ve been hired by $BULLEY because of my eye for millions so i’ll add this to be portfolio of calls. TICKER: $BULLEY LAUNCH: TBA TG: https://t.me/bulleyonsolana X: https://x.com/bulleyonsolana?s=21&t=eEg-Xe5sJhBw9Qy3L4fZGA Optimistic about this one
I’m going to start documenting my journey again, I’ve caught 10-100x - $Macho, I bought in around $150K MCAP and it reached 10Million - $Billy, I saw it around $1.3M MCAP, I waited for a dip but it refused to dip so i bought abit higher. We all know $Billy is going to a Billy That’s to say, I have the eye for bangers, sometimes i sell early but no one is perfect. Let’s see how the rest of the year pans out. 🐂📈💎
Honk Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 1.56 SOL ($225.86) 🔀 7 206,47 HONK 👤 6SWG75...FqaX | Txn ⬆️ Position: >1000% Up! 💸 Market Cap $31 270 000 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events 🟣 | SOL TRENDING #9
Solana's success isn't from betting on the boomer defi coins entirely, it's the fucking degeneracy. All SOL NFT holders were underwater for all of '22 and took a chance on memecoins after they called it a scam. Look at them now. They are riding with their bags, as they did on NFTs they've collected. We've created a culture shift of "majority" NFT traders to now memecoin activists. You're either here because you see…
PEPE = ETH BRETT = BASE WOLF = SOL
LandWolf Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 21.98 SOL ($3285.99) 🔀 3 022 636,42 WOLF 👤 yourmomcoin.sol | Txn ⬆️ New Holder! 💸 Market Cap $1 069 000 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events 🟣 | SOL TRENDING #4
Solana is down bad, nothing is solid for the time being, nothing is passing 1M MC
👎1
This week has been community take over central, stay safe anons a mooner will come
Central Bank Digital Currency Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 4 SOL ($466.76) 🔀 8 189 821,15 CBDC 👤 3meDSs...TMCu | Txn ⬆️ New Holder! 💸 Market Cap $6 525 611 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events 🟣 | SOL TRENDING #8
Central Bank Digital Currency Buy! 💎💎💎💎💎💎💎 🔀 Spent $112.24 (0.95 SOL) 🔀 Got 2,753,965 CBDC 👤 Buyer / TX 🪙 New Holder 💸 Market Cap $4,067,913 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending ⏺ #8 On SOL Trending 🔥
Central Bank Digital Currency Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 5 SOL ($580.7) 🔀 28 037 488,9 CBDC 👤 3vd6J1...4Jf9 | Txn ⬆️ New Holder! 💸 Market Cap $2 437 373 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events 🟣 | SOL TRENDING #8
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @soprivatecalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@soprivatecalls named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 6 posts, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SOPRIVATECALLS” (@soprivatecalls), 8 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soprivatecalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.