Channel
@soniarimakeup
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
267subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002439218101 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @soniarimakeup |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/soniarimakeup |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 267 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 268 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:40 | 268 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 19 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (19 February 2026 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 194 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 00:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
85 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 71 | 83.5% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 8.24% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 7.06% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 1.18% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Выложила ролик про свои бьюти-покупки из Китая 🇨🇳✨ В этот раз я заранее подготовилась к поездке: изучила, какими средствами пользуются китаянки, и собрала несколько интересных позиций. Покупала всё в магазинах KKV и Wow Beauty в Шанхае: 🤍 крем для век Osm 🤍 маска для губ Cibio2 🤍 крем для тела с яблоком PULJIM 🤍 тканевые маски Chando и +WIS+ Из всего списка у нас в продаже нашла только маску для губ. Очень совету…
❤8
Немного фактов о моей второй беременности 🤰 🤍Сейчас у меня уже 24-я неделя 🤍Шевеления я почувствовала на 20-й неделе 🤍За беременность я уже набрала +10 кг 😳Если честно, из-за этого немного переживаю, хотя стараюсь напоминать себе, что сейчас моё тело делает невероятно важную работу 🤍 Пол малыша мы уже знаем 😊И вам расскажу совсем скоро! Спойлер: я долго не могла это принять, хоть и понимаю, что это вообще не важн…
❤11😁7
Ну что, всем привет! 😄 Кажется, четыре месяца отсутствия, это уже не небольшой перерыв🙈 Но у меня есть оправдание: я просто выращивала человека🥹 У нас будет пополнение. 🤍 Честно, эти месяцы были очень насыщенными. Сначала токсикоз решил, что контент мне больше не нужен. Потом ушла няня, потом переезд🏠 Потом я долго не могла принять, что свою жизнь и планы придется снова отложить. Все это время я пыталась впихнуть …
❤23🤗1
И просто топ новость сегодняшнего дня - от нас ушла няня! В один день просто взяла и уехала! Во вторник она получила зарплату, в среду пошла на выходной (говорила, что записана в посольство), а в четверг утром присылает сообщение, что ей срочно надо уехать из страны. Я в полном шоке! 🤯 И ещё этот языковой барьер - из-за него я не могу нормально спросить её, что произошло. Очевидно, что она что-то предчувствовала и …
❤8
🌍 Съездили в путешествие в Сингапур! 🇸🇬 Это был мой первый визит, и я осталась в восторге! Удивительный город с необычными правилами 😅. Благодаря им, он действительно очень чистый и красивый! По моему мнению, Сингапур - это как сочетание Дубая и Майами: много высоток и при этом невероятно зелено! 🌳 🍴 За время нашего путешествия мы ели крабов, наслаждались неимоверно вкусными фруктами и пробовали малазийскую еду. (З…
❤11
🌟 Всем привет! 🌟 Больше месяца ничего не писала! Жизнь слишком кипит, а последние блокировки Telegram заставили меня поволноваться - целую неделю у меня вообще ничего не работало. 😅 Сейчас установила прокси и снова могу быть с вами здесь! 📢 Новостей у нас, по моему, ещё больше, чем в последнем посте! 📝 Обо всем по порядку: ⬇️
Теперь к хорошим новостям ✨ - Через полторы недели мы с мужем летим вдвоём в Сингапур и Шанхай! Очень жду этот трип - вдохновиться, насмотреться, переключится и привезти кучу вдохновения😍 (правда летать боюсь так сильно, что от одной только мысли о самолете уже тошнит🙈) - Обновляю свою бьюти-книгу - мою большую подборку косметики с подробными рекомендациями, ведь за 2 года она немного поменялась💄 - Готовлю гайд по к…
❤8
У нас случился треш🫣 Поймали с Мишей кишечную инфекцию💊 Сначала я: во вторник жутко тошнило, живот болит уже третий день, диарея, и просто не было сил. Грешу на микрозелень - вроде мыла, но похоже не идеально. А вчера ночью Миша подхватил ещё сильнее: его рвало всю ночь каждый час…🫣 Я думала с ума сойду И вишенка на торте - у нас в поселке случилась авария, и не было вообще воды ПОЛТОРА ДНЯ🤯🤯🤯 Представляете, какой …
😢6❤2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @soniarimakeup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,267,691 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Soniarimakeup” (@soniarimakeup), 267 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soniarimakeup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.