Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сынок

Channel

Сынок

@son_ok

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

422subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001538881197
TypeChannel
Username@son_ok
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/son_ok

Growth

422425423.57 August 2026 — 422 subscribers8 August 2026 — 422 subscribers14 August 2026 — 425 subscribers21 August 2026 — 422 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 422–425 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 03:09422-3
14 Aug 2026, 07:37425+3
8 Aug 2026, 05:31422no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:19422first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 October 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

397 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁20451.4%
👍12932.5%
💯379.32%
🥰61.51%
51.26%
🔥41.01%
🤣41.01%
❤‍🔥20.504%
👏20.504%
🤔20.504%
🤩20.504%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 397reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2023 to 20 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Feb 2024, 14:23 UTC≈6,030 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#запомни Учи таблицу умножения! А то разбудят тебя среди ночи, а тебе и сказать нечего 🤷‍♂ @son_ok

😁21👍42🔥2

19 Feb 2024, 12:57 UTC≈6,030 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#факт Деньги меня не беспокоят, они меня успокаивают. @son_ok

👍34

8 Jan 2024, 11:22 UTC≈6,840 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#факт Уже завтра @son_ok

😁18

6 Jan 2024, 09:10 UTC≈5,520 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Внимание, вопрос на миллион! @son_ok

😁141

16 Dec 2023, 09:54 UTC≈5,630 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#факт Я заметил, что те, кто не может себе позволить купить десяток яиц за 150 рублей, и те, кто каждый день покупает пачку сигарет за 200 рублей - часто одни и те же люди 🤔 @son_ok

👍24💯7😁4🥰1

14 Dec 2023, 12:42 UTC≈4,290 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#факт Свой ад я вижу таким: После смерти, я попадаю в огромный кинотеатр, в котором вечно показывают какой охеренной могла бы быть моя жизнь, если бы я принимал правильные решения, не упускал всех возможностей и не вел себя, как ссыкло. Черти в это время ржут и кидаются попкорном в экран. @son_ok

😁16🥰3👍2👏2

13 Dec 2023, 11:42 UTC≈3,720 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#факт Существует уже тысячи эмодзи. Но как же иногда не хватает того самого, бьющегося о стену головой, лампового эмодзи из Аськи. Как же он был хорош! @son_ok

💯18👍3🔥2

12 Dec 2023, 15:26 UTC≈3,420 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#факт Российские философы озадачены новым важнейшим вопросом: "Что подорожало раньше: курица или яйцо?!" @son_ok

😁15🥰1

2 Nov 2023, 12:59 UTC≈5,590 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вау, смотри, что я нашёл! Чипсы со вкусом картошки! @son_ok

😁12👍2🤔21🥰1

1 Nov 2023, 12:15 UTC≈4,970 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#факт Что думаем мы с мамой, когда ты не берешь трубку уже 30 секунд. @son_ok

😁9

30 Oct 2023, 10:03 UTC≈4,160 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#факт Реклама с участием знаменитостей реально работает! Я сегодня выбирал средство для чистки труб в магазине, и купил "КРОТ" только потому, что его когда-то пил Бари Алибасов. @son_ok

😁9

26 Oct 2023, 10:03 UTC≈3,930 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#факт Отзывы на WB, как отдельный вид литературного творчества. @son_ok

😁20🤣4👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @son_ok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,312,501 of 1,626,711entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сынок” (@son_ok), 422 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/son_ok.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.