Channel
@someoneiswrong
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
113subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001051357247 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @someoneiswrong |
| Description | Заметки про разработку, путешествия, проекты Спрашивать тут @lsndr https://lsndr.com |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 January 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/someoneiswrong |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 113 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:20 | 113 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
135 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 46 | 34.1% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 23.7% | |
| ❤ | 22 | 16.3% | |
| 🤔 | 16 | 11.9% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 5.19% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 4.44% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.48% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.741% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2024 to 23 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @someoneiswrong. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 September 2024 to 23 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Перевёл свои пет-проекты с coolify на k3s (это облегчённая версия k8s). Изначально я начинал с compose, потом переехал на coolify и недавно узнал про k3s. И пока что именно последний кажется самым удобным решением. С k3s можно: * через flux хранить конфиг в репозитории и видеть всю историю изменений, * натравить LLM на репозиторий и кластер для деплоя приложений и решения проблем, * легко менять ноды, * в целом деп…
👍3❤2
Вышел Zed v0.191 с моими улучшениями раннера тестов для Typescript/Javascript. Теперь Zed умеет определять и ранить кейсы описанные с each it.each([1, 2])('should return %s', () => { // ... }) и так же стало возможным ранить тесты, где в названии только объект: describe(OrderService, () => { // ... }) Ну еще дебагер на всех раскатили
🔥4💯1
Интересные правила Тайланда * Можно курить траву, но запрещены вейпы, * Поворачивать налево можно даже на красный, но найти разметку для разворота или поворта направо практически невозможно, * Чтобы летать на дроне, нужно получить лицензию пилота, * Принимают около 40 млн. туристов в год, но краткосрочная аренда в кондо запрещена.
🤔4❤3😁3
200к загрузок 🥳
👍4🔥3🎉2❤1
7.5$, 30 минут работы и дрон готов. Правда моргает только одним глазом. В сервис все равно придется отдать. Ну и, кажется, мне надо переходить на что-то подешевле, например гуашью пейзажи рисовать. Потому что во время тестового полета я потерял с ним связь. Спасло, что он сам умеет возвращаться на точку запуска.
🔥3❤2😁1
Судя по реддиту, сломанные лучи – это вторая по частоте поломка после лопастей. Но, чтобы их заменить, нужно полностью разобрать дрон, отодрать все, что приклеено, поменять термопасту и перепаять провода на мотор (при том, что для соседствующих диодов используется шлейф). Поэтому самостоятельно полностью заменить луч сложно, а в сервисе долго. Мой луч более-менее цел, вырвало только провода на диод. Заказал новую о…
🤔1
Прочитал новую книжку Влада Хононова про работу с каплингом. Хорошая книга. Писалась целых 5 лет. Если надоело миллионный раз читать про чистую архитектуру и SOLID, то советую купить и полистать. Тут кратко рассказал про впечатления и основные выводы: https://lsndr.com/post/balancing-coupling-e33e56 Можно еще посмотреть выступление от автора на эту же тему.
👍2🔥1
Под конец прошлого года собрал себе вот такой рабочий сетап: 1. Подставка UGREEN 2. Magic Keyboard 3. Magic Trackpad Позволяет поднять экран практически до уровня глаз, соответственно меньше гнуть спину и шею. А из-за компактности и легкости (~600 грамм) можно брать с собой куда-угодно. Из очевидных минусов: 1. Клавиатура с русской раскладкой В отличие от клавиатуры с английской раскладкой, у нее короткий левый …
👍5
Хороший был сервис. Изначально там вел свое дерево. У них есть автоматический поиск по российским базам репрессированных, военных и т. д. Хорошая категоризация данных. Я во-время успел съехать на MacFamilyTree, который еще удобнее в плане категоризации, имеет todo листы, множество разных графиков и оффлайн бекапы. Сейчас я использую: 1. MacFamilyTree для составления дерева, 2. Genotek для поиска родственников по Д…
🔥5
Git-тоги года https://git-wrapped.com
🔥5❤1
Сколько стоит вырезать аппендицит в Грузии? Недавно лишился бесполезного органа. Хорошо, что это произошло здесь, а не где-то в Азии, где еще сложнее комуницировать и дороже лечиться. К сожалению, страховка у меня закончилась, а продлить ее не успел, поэтому пришлось платить полную цену. 3000 лари (~1070$) стоила сама операция и 3 дня в палате, 500 лари (~170$) хирургу на безбедную старость, 150 лари (~40$) на вся…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @someoneiswrong. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 530,114 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“В интернете кто-то не прав” (@someoneiswrong), 113 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/someoneiswrong.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.