Применяй свою силу в правильное русло.

Channel
solutions
@solutions
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
53,710subscribers
+385 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001676749573 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @solutions @somewhere |
| Description | Website https://solutions.solutions Need help? @solutions_telegram Chat @solutionsolution https://instagram.com/solutions https://jobs.gleb.solutions — Gleb Kostin |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 66 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/solutions |
Topic
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 53,710 | +18 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 53,692 | -12 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:42 | 53,704 | -7 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 53,711 | +9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 53,702 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 53,702 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 53,704 | no change |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 53,704 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 53,706 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 53,705 | -10 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 53,715 | +8 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 53,707 | +76 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 53,631 | +6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 53,625 | +60 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:09 | 53,565 | +23 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:23 | 53,542 | +172 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:07 | 53,370 | +42 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:55 | 53,328 | +205 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:08 | 53,123 | +9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 53,114 | first reading |
Engagement
70 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 109 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 40.3%
- avg views ÷ 53,710 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 21,600
- 25 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 25
- of 70 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 70 (24 June 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 540,500 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 05:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,650
- Videos
- ≈148
- Links
- ≈430
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 13s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
2021 — я не носил ничего из того, что делал 2026 — я не ношу ничего, кроме того, что делал
Когда-нибудь это место будет не только местом для красивых картинок и показывания ‘чего там нового у @solutions вышло’, а просто текстовый блог, картиночная и заметочная комната.
PERFECT COLLECTION * — это серия материальных предметов, из которых ты со временем не вырастаешь.
Posted without readable text
📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁 сайт
📁 📁📁📁📁 📁📁📁📁📁 📁📁📁📁→SKELETON 📁📁📁📁 SLIM 📁📁📁📁📁T-SHIRT SOLUTIONS←📁📁📁📁📁 UNDERWEAR 📁📁📁📁📁↴ PACK GREY 📁📁📁📁📁EYECHE 📁📁📁📁📁PUFF 📁📁📁📁📁J CUT 📁📁📁📁📁SWEAT- 📁📁📁📁📁PANTS → Доступно онлайн: solutions.solutions → Дос…
Video, posted without a caption
📁📁📁📁📁📁📁 available now
Posted without readable text
Video, posted without a caption
ㅤ⚫⚫⚫⚫⚫⚫⚫⚫ ⚫ 📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁 📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁 📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁 📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁 📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁 📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁 📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁 📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁📁 ❶ обновили дизайн сайта: less android more ios. ❷ добавили больше позиций доступных для примерки в .somewhere ❸ в .somewhere теперь можно забрать …
Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @solutions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@solutions edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 22 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 1 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 47 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@srnkdev · 6,3434 postsWAY RU BRANDS
@wayrubrands · 25,2984 postspelevin/archive
@pelevinarchive · 1363 postsRUSSIAN STREETWEAR
@russtreetwear · 14,9283 postsru streetwear location
@streetwear · 22,4353 postsRU BRAND STYLE
@streetwear_ru · 11,3033 postsMYSTERY BOX
@amkalsolutions · 3,9502 postsdot.corp
@dotcorp · 1,6772 postsdofa
@iamthatboy · 1,2412 postsСаканчик ^_^
@sakan4ik · 462 postsSTREETWEAR GEMS
@streetweargems · 16,9842 postsvladk0r
@vladk0r · 3,9212 postsAgony LAB
@agony_lab · 1,0371 postdeveril inc.
@develliir · 1761 postLESHA KOMLEV
@echoofgenerations · 1,9971 postOAO "КУРИТЬ И БУХАТЬ СИГИ"
@outip738 · 11 postpk
@pkudinova · 1261 post.RUWR
@rustreetwr · 981 postбред сумасшедшего
@sokolnkk · 951 post*streetlips*
@streetlips · 8,3791 postTalibiii SQuaD
@TalibiiSQuaD · 471 postтравма детства
@travdet · 12,3841 postYL
@young_1l · 1371 post@karelin
@yslcheetahjeans · 2691 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@solutions named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 30 August 2026 – 31 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@srnkdev · 6,343#1
@paradeevich · 1,059,396#2
@madeinrussia · 12,746#3
@flamebaker · 19,588#4
@restyosoul · 3,492#5
@day_51 · 1,388#6
@wearworld · 16,166#7
@omanko · 113,987#8
@the9mice · 276,475#9
@plohoypacan · 381,759#10
@omanko_news · 47,826#11
@dogsl1fe · 84,266#12
@cdrommm · 9,637#13
@fakeboys01 · 41,702#14
@ruslanselimovv · 1,126#15
@vanokregular13 · 11,809#16
@koreshzy · 829,871#17
@exilemusic13 · 1,445,701#18
@rehabmedicalemergency · 10,161#19
@gosharubchinskiy · 50,616#20
@rhymesrim · 294,808#21
@streetwearplace · 13,734#22
@wheremylostfamily · 21,651#23
@strtwearr · 20,927#24
@wayrubrands · 25,298#25
@budaog · 358,953#26
@boulevardepo · 106,125#27
@lovvdoublesix · 155,221#28
@anortxpole · 6,069#29
@nmshhub · 727,604#30
@dlyaobshegovreda · 20,284#31
@qjayworld · 7,257#32
@slavamarlow · 66,854#33
@bushidozho · 188,779#34
@streetwearmag · 18,025#35
@aarneteam · 86,072#36
@risazatvorchestvo · 165,824#37
@saint_mob · 42,696#38
@danila_gorilla · 643,829#39
@nocap · 54,970#40
@studio21ru · 44,790#41
@ZNMA_ULTRA · 4,856#42
@oblagram · 99,663#43
@vitali_akimov · 4,896#44
@scallymilanogram · 202,267#45
@stopbaba · 187,581#46
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@gosharubchinskiy · 50,616
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 August 2026
@grigokon1 · 73,594
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 25 August 2026
@thequietplace · 51,332
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“solutions” (@solutions), 53,710 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solutions.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.