Channel
@solitudeadult
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
63subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001628494058 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @solitudeadult |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/solitudeadult |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 63 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 64 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 64 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 4 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
107 reactions across 11 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 37.4% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 16.8% | |
| 😢 | 11 | 10.3% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 6.54% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 5.61% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 5.61% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 4.67% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 3.74% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 2.80% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 2.80% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.87% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2025 to 3 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @solitudeadult. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 April 2025 to 3 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Грэмми имеет удивительное свойство из года в год создавать повод для боевых действий среди музыкальных критиков и слушателей, хотя как по мне это мероприятие уже давно набило оскомину и стало своего рода "банкетом" для людей из индустрии и, подчеркну, только для них. Но даже в 2026 году этот голубой огонёк по какой-то причине вызывает у людей желание плеваться ядом. В этот раз такой причиной стал Карлик Ламар. Да, …
❤5💘4🤔1
Короче, денех не дали. Че, работать что ли придется? Баляяя, что ж такое то. Завтра поясню за новый альбом Ракима, ну а в конце недели раскидаю за уже забытый альбом Хаски. Хватит с меня щитпоста — эта эра в прошлом.
👍3❤2👏2🔥2🤬1
Ну вот и подошли мои настоящие итоги года. В этот раз скудно. Музыки я слушал в несколько раз меньше чем в прошлом году, тому виной жизненные обстоятельства, которые я до сих пор не в состоянии побороть. Из мемных ситуаций: Френдли Таг каким-то образом умудрился занять почётные места, хотя по существу я слушал его исключительно для того, чтобы написать вразумительный разгромный текст о тусклости русского рэпа, котор…
❤5🔥3😢3
Перестаньте отписываться, я не забросил дело своей жизни, я просто думаю........
❤8👍3🔥3
Коллаборация о которой я узнал только благодаря активному пушу Фреда в инстаграме. Между прочим это его первый релиз в новом году, и получилось очень недурно. Подойдёт для патрулирования ваших ночных районов в тёмных очках и плотных худи — за это отвечает Скепта. Ну а за музыкальный оргазм ответственность берет сам Фред. Отдельный респект за взятый на припев кусок из трэка Doechii — Swamp Bitches. Получился такой …
🔥5❤3💘2😁1
Video message, posted without a caption
Я знаю, что будет играть в клубах сегодняшним летом. Сначала SLAVA MARLOW проявился для меня как талантливый продюсер, пугающий тем, с какой простотой у него получается чувствовать настроение здесь и сейчас. Затем, внутренне остепенившись, Слава превращается в Артёма и заявляет о себе, как о большом артисте, который способен не только клипать трэки для топ чарта, но и создавать объемные и красочные работы в формате…
❤3💘1🔥1
Ехать в такси под Рика Джеймса 😁
❤3🔥2🥰2
Планы на лето - не строить планов, кроме тех, что не успел выполнить. Всех с днём лета!
❤5🤬2🥰2😁1
Сегодня за один день увидел женскую версию Роберта Де Ниро, юриста Антона Долгих и Эмму Робертс. Пост не музыкальный ни разу, но зато убеждающий меня, что у каждого из нас есть двойник!
🤔3🔥2❤1😱1
Кид Кади выступил в суде над Пафф Дэдди и рассказал историю, которая в СМИ подавалась как «Пи Дидди взорвал машину Кид Кади». Помощник прокурора: что изображено на этом фото? Кид Кади: отверстие, которое они прорезали в крыше моей машины, чтобы бросить туда коктейль Молотова Помощник прокурора: какова была ваша реакция на то, что вашу машину подожгли? Кид Кади: "че за хуйня?" Помощник прокурора: что делал Дидди,…
❤4😁4🤯2🤔1
Паша умер🥺 С такой грустной новостью пришлось сюда вернуться. Человек-глыба русского рэпа и экспериментальной музыки, чья медийка в последние годы держалась, к сожалению, во многом за счёт его проблем с веществами. И пока массы восторженно улюлюкали от каждого нового мема Паши и требовали новых зрелищ, я видел в его глазах настоящую боль. Те самые вещества его в итоге и погубили. Очень жаль, что он так и не смог…
😢8😱2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @solitudeadult. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,351,325 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Solitude” (@solitudeadult), 63 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solitudeadult.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.