Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐ŸŽชะกะพะปะตะฒะพะน๐ŸŽช

@solevoili

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry

478subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001601284619
TypeChannel
Username@solevoili
Created12 March 2022 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/solevoili

Growth

478479478.511 Aug 2026, 02:47 โ€” 479 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 23:53 โ€” 478 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 02:4711 Aug 2026, 23:53
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 478โ€“479 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 23:53478-1
11 Aug 2026, 02:47479first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
30.2%
avg views รท 478 subscribers
Avg views / post
145
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.4%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 15 July 2026
Posts held12 (1 April 2026 โ€“ 15 July 2026)
Views total289
Reactions total30
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
36s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

310 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ™10032.3%
๐Ÿ“8627.7%
๐Ÿ’‹8326.8%
๐Ÿ˜ˆ3711.9%
๐Ÿ˜ญ41.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 310reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 11 we hold a reading for ยท 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @solevoili. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 April 2026 to 15 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC145 views16 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ะฏ ะฟั€ะพัะปะฐะฒะธะปัั ั‚ะตะผ ั‡ั‚ะพ ะฟะธะทะดะฐะฝัƒะปัั ะฝะฐ ั€ะตะฟะตั‚ะธั†ะธะธ ะธ ั‚ะตะฟะตั€ัŒ ะฒัะต ะฟะพะดั…ะพะดัั‚ ะธ ะฟะตั€ะตะถะธะฒะฐัŽั‚ ะพะฑะพ ะผะฝะต

๐Ÿ’‹12๐Ÿ“4

15 Jul 2026, 13:11 UTC144 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @raspilimenabolgarkojPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ“9๐Ÿ™5

8 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC232 views23 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @reyuiuPhoto

๐Ÿฅก ะกะพะตะฒะพะต ะผััะพ ๐Ÿ–ค https://t.me/boss_dostozaev https://t.me/solevoili #commission. ๐Ÿคฉ

๐Ÿ“11๐Ÿ’‹8๐Ÿ™4

8 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC229 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ะ“ะพะดะพะฒั‰ะธะฝะฐ ั ะถะตะฝะพะน

๐Ÿ’‹2

21 Jun 2026, 11:47 UTC361 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Posted without readable text

๐Ÿ™9๐Ÿ“6๐Ÿ’‹4

8 Jun 2026, 08:32 UTC471 views40 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ะคะฐะฝะบะพะฝ2026๐Ÿ˜‡ ะญั‚ะพ ะฟั€ะพัั‚ะพ ะฐั…ัƒะตะฝะฝะพ ะฅะพั‡ัƒ ะตั‰ะต

๐Ÿ™21๐Ÿ“11๐Ÿ’‹8

1 May 2026, 10:59 UTC832 views26 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿซง๐Ÿซง ๐Ÿคฉ ะฏ ะฒั‹ั€ะฒัƒ ั‚ะฒะพะธ ะณะปะฐะทะฐ, ะงั‚ะพะฑ ะฝะต ะผะพะณ ั‚ั‹ ัะผะพั‚ั€ะตั‚ัŒ ะฝะฐ ะดั€ัƒะณะธั…, ะงั‚ะพะฑั‹ ะผะพะณ ะปัŽะฑะธั‚ัŒ ะปะธัˆัŒ ะผะตะฝั, ะ˜ ะบะฐัะฐั‚ัŒัั ะณัƒะฑ ะปะธัˆัŒ ะผะพะธั…. ะฏ ัะฒัะถัƒ ั‚ะตะฑั, ะงั‚ะพะฑั‹ ั‚ั‹ ะฝะธะบัƒะดะฐ ะฝะต ัƒัˆะตะป, ะ•ัะปะธ ะฝะฐะดะพ, ัƒะฑัŒัŽ ั‚ะตะฑั, ะะพ ะดะฐะฒะฐะน ะพะฑะพะนะดะตะผัั ะฑะตะท ัˆะพัƒ.๐Ÿคฉ ะ—ะตะปะตะฝั‹ะน-https://t.me/boss_dostozaev #ะบะพัะฟ

๐Ÿ“14๐Ÿ™6๐Ÿ˜ˆ5๐Ÿ’‹1

27 Apr 2026, 10:36 UTCโ‰ˆ1,370 views56 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿคฉ๐•ธ๐–”๐–™๐–Ž ๐•บ๐–š๐–Œ๐–†๐–Ž๐Ÿคฉ ๐Ÿคฉโ„‘'๐”ช ๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ข ๐”ก๐”ฌ๐” ๐”ฑ๐”ฌ๐”ฏ, โ„‘'๐”ช ๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ข ๐”ญ๐”ž๐”ฑ๐”ฆ๐”ข๐”ซ๐”ฑ๐”‡๐”ฌ๐”ซ'๐”ฑ ๐”ฃ๐”ฌ๐”ฏ๐”ค๐”ข๐”ฑ ๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ž๐”ฑ, ๐”ฆ๐”ฑ'๐”ฐ ๐”ฆ๐”ช๐”ญ๐”ฌ๐”ฏ๐”ฑ๐”ž๐”ซ๐”ฑโ„‘๐”ฃ ๐”ถ๐”ฌ๐”ฒ ๐”ฉ๐”ฌ๐”ณ๐”ข ๐”ช๐”ข, ๐”ฉ๐”ฆ๐”จ๐”ข โ„‘ ๐”ฉ๐”ฌ๐”ณ๐”ข ๐”ช๐”ข๐”ˆ๐”ณ๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”ถ๐”Ÿ๐”ฌ๐”ก๐”ถ ๐”ด๐”ฆ๐”ฉ๐”ฉ ๐”Ÿ๐”ข ๐”ฐ๐”ฌ๐”ฏ๐”ฏ๐”ถ๐”š๐”ข๐”ฉ๐”ฉ, โ„‘ ๐”ก๐”ฌ๐”ซ'๐”ฑ ๐”ซ๐”ข๐”ข๐”ก ๐”ซ๐”ฌ๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ฆ๐”ซ' ๐”Ÿ๐”ข๐”ฃ๐”ฌ๐”ฏ๐”ข ๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ข ๐”ฐ๐”ฅ๐”ฌ๐”ดโ„‘ ๐”ก๐”ฌ๐”ซ'๐”ฑ ๐”ซ๐”ข๐”ข๐”ก ๐”ซ๐”ฌ๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ฆ๐”ซ', ๐”ด๐”ข๐”ฉ๐”ฉ, ๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ž๐”ฑ'๐”ฐ ๐”ซ๐”ฌ๐”ฑ ๐”ฐ๐”ฌโ„‘ ๐”ซ๐”ข๐”ข๐”ก ๐”ฐ๐”ฌ๐”ช๐”ข๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ฆ๐”ซ๐”ค ๐”Ÿ๐”ข๐”ฃ๐”ฌ๐”ฏ๐”ข ๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ข ๐”ฐ๐”ฅ๐”ฌ๐”ด๐”๐”ฒ๐”ฐ๐”ฑ ๐”ž ๐”ฉ๐”ฆ๐”ฑ๐”ฑ๐”ฉ๐”ข ๐”ฐ๐”ฌ๐”ช๐”ข๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ฆ๐”ซ๐”ค ๐”ฑ๐”ฌ ๐”ช๐”ž๐”จ๐”ข ๐”ช๐”ข ๐”ค๐”ฌ๐Ÿคฉ #ะบะพัะฟ

๐Ÿ™33๐Ÿ’‹12๐Ÿ“9๐Ÿ˜ˆ2

12 Apr 2026, 08:54 UTC604 views38 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ”๐•ธ๐–ž ๐–‰๐–Š๐–†๐–— ๐–‘๐–”๐–›๐–Š, ๐•ด ๐–’๐–Ž๐–˜๐–˜ ๐–™๐–๐–Š ๐–‰๐–†๐–ž๐–˜ ๐–œ๐–๐–Š๐–“ ๐•ด ๐–ˆ๐–”๐–š๐–‘๐–‰ ๐–Š๐–“๐–๐–”๐–ž ๐–ž๐–”๐–š๐–— ๐–˜๐–Ž๐–“๐–Œ๐–Ž๐–“๐–Œ.๐Ÿ” ๐Ÿคฉโ„‘ ๐”ช๐”ฆ๐”ฐ๐”ฐ ๐”ฌ๐”ฒ๐”ฏ ๐”ก๐”ž๐”ฒ๐”ค๐”ฅ๐”ฑ๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”ฐ ๐”ด๐”ฅ๐”ฌ ๐”ž๐”ฉ๐”ด๐”ž๐”ถ๐”ฐ ๐”Ÿ๐”ฏ๐”ž๐”ฆ๐”ก๐”ข๐”ก ๐”ช๐”ถ ๐”ฅ๐”ž๐”ฆ๐”ฏ ๐”ž๐”ซ๐”ก ๐”ฉ๐”ž๐”ฒ๐”ค๐”ฅ๐”ข๐”ก ๐”ฉ๐”ฌ๐”ฒ๐”ก๐”ฉ๐”ถ. ๐”Š๐”ฌ๐”ก'๐”ฐ ๐”ญ๐”ฒ๐”ซ๐”ฆ๐”ฐ๐”ฅ๐”ช๐”ข๐”ซ๐”ฑ ๐”ด๐”ฆ๐”ฉ๐”ฉ ๐”ฌ๐”ณ๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”ฑ๐”ž๐”จ๐”ข ๐”ฌ๐”ฒ๐”ฏ ๐”ฅ๐”ฌ๐”ช๐”ข, ๐”Ÿ๐”ฒ๐”ฑ โ„‘ ๐”ฑ๐”ž๐”จ๐”ข ๐” ๐”ž๐”ฏ๐”ข ๐”ฌ๐”ฃ ๐”ถ๐”ฌ๐”ฒ, ๐”ช๐”ถ ๐”ก๐”ข๐”ž๐”ฏ ๐”ฌ๐”ซ๐”ข๐”ฐ.๐Ÿคฉ #ะบะพัะฟ #ัˆะตะนะผัƒัะฟะตะณะณ #seamuspegg

๐Ÿ™20๐Ÿ’‹11๐Ÿ“5๐Ÿ˜ˆ2

10 Apr 2026, 10:19 UTC482 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @raspilimenabolgarkojVideo

ะ‘ะฐั‚ะตะบ ะ”ะถะธะฝะฝ ะธ ะ‘ะฐั€ะฑะฐั€ั‹. ๐Ÿ’ ะ˜ ะผะพะธ ะบั€ะธะฒะปัะฝะธั ะฝะฐ ะบะฐะผะตั€ัƒ #ะบะพัะฟ

๐Ÿ’‹14๐Ÿ˜ญ3๐Ÿ“2

10 Apr 2026, 08:42 UTCviews โ€”

Channel name was changed to ยซ๐ŸŽชะกะพะปะตะฒะพะน๐ŸŽชยป

1 Apr 2026, 15:19 UTC650 views57 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

ะฏ ะฟัะธั…ะธั‡ะตัะบะธ ัƒัั‚ะพะนั‡ะธะฒั‹ะน ะดะพะฑั€ั‹ะน ะผะธะปั‹ะน ะธ ะฟะพะปะฝะพัั‚ัŒัŽ ัƒั€ะฐะฒะฝะพะฒะตัˆะตะฝะฝั‹ะน ะบะฐะบ ะธ ะฒัะต ั‚ัƒั‚ ัะธะดัั‰ะธะต

๐Ÿ˜ˆ28๐Ÿ“15๐Ÿ’‹11๐Ÿ™2๐Ÿ˜ญ1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @solevoili. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 859,473 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐ŸŽชะกะพะปะตะฒะพะน๐ŸŽชโ€ (@solevoili), 478 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solevoili.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.