Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hunter [Solana] 🐺

Channel

Hunter [Solana] 🐺

@sol_gem_hunter

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

785subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002254759268
TypeChannel
Username@sol_gem_hunter
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sol_gem_hunter

Growth

785824804.57 August 2026 β€” 824 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 823 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 810 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 790 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 785 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 779–830 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 10:07785-5
23 Aug 2026, 02:49790-20
16 Aug 2026, 05:57810-13
7 Aug 2026, 23:07823-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:47824first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

460 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ”₯11324.6%
πŸ‘10623.0%
❀9821.3%
πŸ₯°398.48%
🀩378.04%
πŸ‘347.39%
πŸŽ‰337.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 460reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC195 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Let’s find Solanas

πŸ”₯7❀6πŸ‘5πŸŽ‰2🀩2πŸ₯°2πŸ‘1

5 Jul 2026, 00:06 UTC196 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

It’s possible to make 200 SOL ape to 20,000 now

πŸ‘9❀4πŸ‘4πŸ”₯4πŸŽ‰3🀩2

4 Jul 2026, 21:51 UTC197 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

This teams Operatrion is destroy mbappe

πŸ”₯7πŸ‘5πŸ‘4❀3πŸŽ‰2🀩1

4 Jul 2026, 18:28 UTC198 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

πŸ‡²πŸ‡¦

❀9πŸ”₯5πŸ‘4πŸŽ‰2🀩2πŸ₯°2πŸ‘1

4 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC382 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

0.5 SOL GIVEAWAY πŸ’ƒ

πŸ‘8πŸ”₯6❀4πŸ₯°3πŸŽ‰2πŸ‘2

4 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC387 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Dips don’t last if the community continues to grow

πŸ”₯7❀4πŸ‘3πŸŽ‰2🀩2πŸ‘1

4 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC516 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Solana giving 2024 vibes but with the price down -60%

πŸ”₯9πŸ‘5❀4πŸ‘3πŸ₯°2πŸŽ‰1🀩1

4 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC510 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❀4πŸ‘4πŸ”₯4πŸ‘2🀩2πŸ₯°2πŸŽ‰1

4 Jul 2026, 00:24 UTC504 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Match is crazy

πŸ‘7πŸ”₯7❀4πŸŽ‰4πŸ₯°2πŸ‘1

3 Jul 2026, 21:11 UTC504 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

2024 szn again please πŸ™

❀9πŸ‘6πŸ”₯3🀩3πŸŽ‰2πŸ‘2

3 Jul 2026, 21:06 UTC498 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I feel solana bull run coming

❀1πŸŽ‰1πŸ‘1πŸ”₯1πŸ₯°1

3 Jul 2026, 17:33 UTC491 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

If Messi scores today Il give away 3 Solanas 1 to 3 people Amen πŸ™

πŸ”₯7❀6πŸ‘5🀩4πŸ₯°2πŸ‘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sol_gem_hunter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 956,741 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œHunter [Solana] πŸΊβ€ (@sol_gem_hunter), 785 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sol_gem_hunter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.