Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SojuDAO Global 🌏

@sojudao

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

96subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002215933011
TypeChannel
Username@sojudao
DescriptionAnnouncements and information from all things SojuDAO | https://sojudao.xyz
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/sojudao

Growth

967 August 2026 — 96 subscribers9 August 2026 — 96 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95–97 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 12:0396no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:3496first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 15 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
76
Videos
9
Links
41

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15m 26s
Average length
3m 05s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1872.0%
👍312.0%
🔥28.00%
14.00%
😁14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2025 to 30 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jan 2025, 06:26 UTC278 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Welcome to the new IPO: Internet Public Offering 💾 @ipodotfun ⚠️Warning: you might get rich

2

30 Jan 2025, 01:06 UTC256 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

The former co-founder of Venmo and @lessin launched $jellyjelly today and it auto sent to $150m MCAP in under an hour 😱 Last week we said it, the IPO or Internet Public offering is here, and its on @pumpdotfun NOT the NYSE. @notthreadguy has a similar thesis called Internet Capital Markets. Today is a testament to that thesis. Companies will raise capital on the internet. On pump. With crypto. 2025 is going to be

🔥1😁1

29 Jan 2025, 06:05 UTC184 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Happy New Year from SojuDAO! 새해 복 많이 받으세요 🫰

4

29 Jan 2025, 04:59 UTC186 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

What are the best crypto conferences in crypto? My build: S- Token Singapore, Solana Breakpoint A- KBW, Token Dubai, ETH Denver, ETH CC B- IVS, Devcon, Permissionless C- Consensus, Mainnet D- Bitcoin Conference, Apefest, NFT NYC Share your best conferences👀 📺 Watch on X: https://x.com/cryptosmiff/status/1884338295745703942

3

27 Jan 2025, 17:48 UTC132 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

Deepseeks impact on the global stage is making headlines today NVDA is down nearly 17% since the stock market opened The TL crashing out about a Chinese made ai application Sam Altman quiet af Is China back? 📺 Watch on X: https://x.com/cryptosmiff/status/1883934415992316200

26 Jan 2025, 22:44 UTC123 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Another social crypto app got me about to crashout 😭 The fundamental issue with the design of crypto social apps is that the incentive to use them is just monetary The only social app to get "token gating" right so far is Onlyfans with the main incentive of a user being...sex TikTok, IG, Snapchat all have incentives other than $. Ofc money is there to be made but these apps help us feel cool, follow ppl we think a

1

26 Jan 2025, 01:26 UTC86 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Was the Trump token launch bearish for markets? The market has been sluggish ever since the launch of $Trump launch. Billions of $ rinsed and still room to go. This week there was enough bullish news to pump BTC to the moon, but the price is down on the week. @blknoiz06 posted from his private account @conzimp stating his fears the market reached a tipping point has broken down for the worst Part of our problem i

🔥1

24 Jan 2025, 17:09 UTC74 viewsread 9 August 2026

2 Words: Bitcoin and CBDCs Yesterday the Trump admin executed an executive order paving way for government allocation of crypto assets and to open up the possibility for massive stablecoin adoption What did this executive order do: > ensures access to open public blockchain networks for lawful purposes >promotes the U.S. dollar's sovereignty through lawful dollar-backed stablecoins >ensures fair access to banking

23 Jan 2025, 18:48 UTC71 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

We are now in the times of IPOs: Internet Public Offerings Last night the founder of Vine @rus launched $Vinecoin on @pumpdotfun, which in just a few hours pumped to $500m mcap 🤯 A new meta has arrived. Companies with pre-existing user bases and products will see this and take note. The ICO era will have its day. Will we see a rise in companies launching their public offerings directly on the blockchain? With the

1

22 Jan 2025, 06:12 UTC68 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

In '21 crypto experience its greatest shift in liquidity with the Federal Reserve's' broad sweeping monetary policy changes post-covid kicking off the bull run 3 weeks into 2025 we are going through the greatest regulatory shift in crypto history: making crime legal again. Will this kick off the next great crypto bull run? In Just 72 hours we have already seen the Trump admin: - launch the $TRUMP memecoin - launch

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @sojudao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,251,352 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SojuDAO Global 🌏” (@sojudao), 96 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sojudao.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.