Channel
@soitsfootball
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
62subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002573776132 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @soitsfootball |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/soitsfootball |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 62 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 61 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 59 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 59 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 30.0% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @soitsfootball. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇪🇸➡️🏴Еще одно блюдо из рациона – аренда Араухо в «Ливерпуль». Я уже видел эти шутки о том, что фанаты «Барселоны» не могут понять, что лучше: все трансферы этого лета или уход Араухо (и Феррана сверху). Понять можно. Но стоит начать с фигуры Рональда. Он абсолютно потерялся в системе Флика. Не самый сильный первый пас и высокая травматичность. Всего 1500 минут в прошлом сезоне. Рональд – жертва системы Флика и не б…
❤1
Я сгонял в мини-отпуск. Переболел сильнейшей ангиной. В общем, пора потихонечку возвращаться. А последние пару дней дали много пищи для размышлений. И первое — смерть Хорхе Месси. Человека, который дал нам Лионеля и его талант. И речь не о том, что он встретил женщину, у них вспыхнула любовь и появился Лео. Вырастить лучшего футболиста в истории — это особый путь, особенно с теми проблемами, которые были у семьи и у…
❤1
⚽️🇪🇺Пока там разворачивается биф между Инфантино и Чеферином, я бы не забывал про другой момент. Чеферин сейчас выглядит супергероем, потому что занял сторону справедливости в вопросе продажи прав ЧМ. Но нельзя забывать, что у него самого "рыльце в пуху". Уже который год Аль-Хелаифи кидает деньги в казну УЕФА и качественно помог Чеферину, когда испанские топы хотели создать Суперлигу. Обыкновенный жабогадюкинг, но на…
🇩🇪С лучшим комплектом в Европе на следующий сезон определились.
🤮1
😉 Месси не смог, Англия тоже, а испанцы смогли, да ещё как! | Итоги ЧМ-2026 Чемпионат мира завершился, и Английский Акцент подводит его итоги. Александр Симбирский, Кирилл Михайлов, Виталий Мягкий и Богдан Дереволазов собрались вместе, чтобы обсудить прошедший мундиаль, подаривший нам столько эмоций и пищи для размышлений! 🔹 Виноват ли Томас Тухель в неудаче сборной Англии? И если нет, то кого же винить? Выделяем г…
Вчера мои рекомендации в рилсиках отправили в какую-то новую сторону. Все началось с заговора, что Аргентина специально слила финал. А закончилось тем, что чемпионат мира - это большой масонский ритуал. И если в комментариях про финал чаще можно было встретить адекватных. То вот про масонов в топах самых залайканых из разряда "как здорово, что у меня открылись глаза" и так далее. И они набирают десятки тысяч лайков.…
❤1💯1
🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸
🥰1
🇪🇸А в России есть адекватные фанаты Мадрида?
🏆🇪🇸Новое время наступило
⚽️🇪🇸🇦🇷Ферран!!!!!! Испанцы не отпустят эту игру. Теперь не должны.
⚽️🇪🇸🇦🇷В допвремя могут выйти Иньеста и Вилья. Аргентинцы все равно не будут выходить со своей половины поля.
⚽️🇪🇸🇦🇷Аргентинцам нужно тянуть до серии пенальти. Выиграть на поле этот финал я не вижу шансов.
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @soitsfootball. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мягкая подача” (@soitsfootball), 62 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soitsfootball.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.