Channel
@softzhizn
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003426129166 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @softzhizn |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/softzhizn |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:56 | 19 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 20 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 20 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
28 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5319164206929426020 | 9 | 32.1% | |
| custom 5875396805729984033 | 6 | 21.4% | |
| custom 5875417550422023070 | 4 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5316762594361488556 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5316711376876485361 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| custom 5319070993254201336 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| custom 5875099830216301044 | 2 | 7.14% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ватафак? Работаю дальше в этом направлении, проблема тут скорее в том, что твиттер не супер продвигающая платформа, да у кого-то посты залетают, но я пока не вошел в их число, видел что в основном после 100-350 начинают залетать посты тупо из-за trust, посмотрим что будет, может к концу месяца наберу эту сотку
custom 53167625943614885563custom 58754175504220230703custom 58753968057299840332
Что самое смешное, когда пишешь реплаи в твиттере? Видеть вот такие комментарии - одна буква/смайлик огонечка/you cooked, bro
custom 53191642069294260203
В прошлой понравилось больше из-за вайба и текучки людей, они добавляют антуража
Приехал в ЕКБ
custom 58753968057299840332custom 58750998302163010441custom 58754175504220230701
Наконец у меня есть нормальный сайт, для прогрева гоев! https://soft-portfolio-one.vercel.app/
custom 58753968057299840331
галочка, хули
custom 53191642069294260202custom 58750998302163010441custom 58753968057299840331
сегодня разбора не будет, я не дома 🥺
либо я дебил, либо лыжи не едут, ну кликни раз увидел 😊
5 день, молюсь, чтобы это набрало Miro: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVH_e6oSQ=/?share_link_id=186364929399
4 день, не уверен, что я профи, но немного знаю точно) Miro: miro.com/app/board/uXjV Забыл вчера кинуть, сегодня ждите еще
Властелин колец, еще один разбор, день 3/15 https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVH_nRrWw=/?share_link_id=975474320230
Оппенгеймер, дорогие друзья, прошёлся по базе монтажа любых видео в целом, наслаждайтесь https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVHARiXuY=/?share_link_id=94552042378
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @softzhizn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Soft” (@softzhizn), 19 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/softzhizn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.