Channel
@soft_crypto_feedback
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
347subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002072539829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @soft_crypto_feedback |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 4 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/soft_crypto_feedback |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 347 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 351 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 351 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 4 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
💣 HOW TO MAKE MONEY LIKE WE DO 👇 1⃣ Getting a subscription based on what level of income you expect (1-4 blockchains) 2⃣ Starting a software and waiting for a Private Keys from forgotten wallet 3⃣ Using the Keys to get access to a wallet with any application, like Trust Wallet 4⃣ Withdrawing all coins that were hidden inside to a personal wallet SUPER EASY 💲💲💲 Find wallets with me 👉 Admin
Good job guys 👏 You’re always one step ahead of those who are still doubting! All crypto is rising, that’s a great opportunity to make more money than usually. If not now is the best time to get into searching crypto wallets then when?
Excellent results await all of our clients 👑 What is already working for many, will work for others who are not with us yet 💰 Who wants to be the next success story?😎 💸- making software ⌨️ @Admin 😂 ❤️- @feedback
While you're waiting, others are already joining us and earning money. 💸💸💸 If you make a decision at some point, it may be beneficial, but according to our clients, the decision is worthless as it leads to wasted time and unearned money. 🙆♂️ Seek out wallets with me @Admin.
💬 Some feedbacks from our members who joined us recently and FOUND THEIR FIRST WALLETS 💰 Join us today 👉 @Admin
🔥 This guy decided to make himself happy with expensive Apple Ipad from his first findings, and what would you buy yourself with your first money that you found? 🤑
I'M SPEECHLESS 😮 Now that's an EXAMPLE OF A MOTIVATED PERSON 🔥🚀 ✔️ Saw an opportunity ✔️ Made the most of it ✔️ Got a great result Find wallets with me 👉 @Admin
Not only I earn money whit my soft💲 🙈 🔥 Look at my clients' results 🔥 I'M SURE NOW - IS THE COOLEST TIME to earn money. And who knows maybe in one year you'll not have such opportunity ⌛️ Find wallets with us 👉 @Admin
Here is an example of how in just one and a half day with just 1 blockchain you can realize what you want, just like this guy did 👍 Find wallets with me 👉 @Admin
‼️ Many people don't believe that it's possible to make good money with my software because they're used to the idea that money can only be earned through HARD WORK👩💻 and no other way. And I understand them. But guys, you also need to understand that THE WORLD HAS CHANGED 🕓 It's not the same as it was 10-20 years ago. Now you have plenty of opportunities and one of these opportunities is my software✔️ Of course, …
Guys, you can't believe how happy I am when I see your messages with the results ☺️ For me, it matters a lot and means that many years ago, I made THE RIGHT DECISION⚡️ to develop the software so now it can help hundreds of people improve their lives and financial status 🔝
Get the first wallet and go on vacation? ✈️ WHY NOT? Especially when the first wallet 💰 that came to my client was valued at over $1,2k. Guys,I want to remind you, ALWAYS follow your dreams and do everything to achieve them. Otherwise, what are you living for? 🤔
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @soft_crypto_feedback. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 71,397 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@soft_crypto_feedback named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto SOFT™ 💻 feedback” (@soft_crypto_feedback), 347 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soft_crypto_feedback.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.