Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

София и софизм|5:0

@sofisofism

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

114subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002089620058
TypeChannel
Username@sofisofism
DescriptionСофия Александровна вещает @SofiVoz Объединяю коммуникации, менеджмент и дизайн. Шило в причинном месте ни ногам, ни голове покоя не даёт. Здесь и умные темы и кринжуля.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/sofisofism

Growth

1147 August 2026 — 114 subscribers9 August 2026 — 114 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 113–115 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 06:00114no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:13114first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
112.3%
avg views ÷ 114 subscribers
Avg views / post
128
1 post measured
Reaction rate
25.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held20 (17 March 202619 July 2026)
Views total128
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
192
Videos
9
Links
39

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

473 reactions across 19 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8618.2%
6513.7%
❤‍🔥6413.5%
😁6112.9%
💔265.50%
👀194.02%
😍194.02%
🥰194.02%
🫡163.38%
🏆142.96%
custom 5274213822238838908122.54%
💘122.54%
👍102.11%
💅102.11%
😱102.11%
🍌71.48%
🤡71.48%
custom 592711864444939134761.27%
30.634%
🍓30.634%
2 further kinds40.846%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 473reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sofisofism. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 March 2026 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC128 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Еду с PRIRODNIK 3 от AVA и мыслю тестово замутить один движ. Для этого нужно чуть вернуться в публичность и канал. Ну бум пробовать. Да, Мать Шараги трегает меня за грудь😍

❤‍🔥19custom 52742138222388389089custom 59271186444493913475

26 Jun 2026, 07:16 UTC188 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

В этом вся суть

😁14👀8🥰2custom 52742138222388389081

5 Jun 2026, 09:44 UTC225 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Спонсор этого поста Никита Кечкин! 🎮 На неделе я делались историей своих познаний в вайбкодинге и анимации на сайтах при помощи нейронок. Несмотря на то, что сегодня многое можно сделать при помощи нейросетей, я уверена в необходимости умения работать со специальными программами. Не все из анимации можно сделать через промпт. И не стоит забывать, что нейро-анимация менее предсказуема, ее сложнее править и иногда бы

❤‍🔥10🥰7custom 52742138222388389082custom 59271186444493913471

28 May 2026, 13:55 UTC215 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💚 Через 5 минуть буду рассказывать почему еду на Мультибрендинг в 4й раз Всем смотреть обязательно тут ⬇️ https://live.vkvideo.ru/multibranding И участвовать в розыгрыше путевок вот тут

😍14🥰76

1 May 2026, 18:19 UTC261 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Если вдруг кто-то задается вопросом: "Почему тут только забавный контент". Причина у меня такая же как и у Мари.

13😁7🫡5

1 May 2026, 18:18 UTC216 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @drgv_diary

У меня есть две причины почему я не веду соц сети: А. Происходит слишком много событий и я просто не успеваю всё это выкладывать Б. Ничего не происходит, кроме рутинной работы Сейчас нахожусь в точке А. Всем май и энергии 🤩

143🔥2

29 Apr 2026, 20:40 UTC209 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @psy_elenakoVideo

Все проблемы ничто против людей с такой походкой (я справа)

💘12🔥8😍3💅2

29 Apr 2026, 20:40 UTC171 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я: строю из себя серьезную взрослую женщину. Так же я:

😁2

21 Apr 2026, 08:06 UTC209 views34 reactionsread 9 August 2026

А мы тут кейсик новый запилили 🐻 Повод вспомнить как круто прошел DPFA в том году. Для нас SPELLLENSов особенно. Эти люди не давали мне спать ночами, потому что мы все время что-то обсуждали 🤣 Ну и один день тусили до утра, было!

❤‍🔥16🔥117

21 Apr 2026, 08:05 UTC173 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @spelllensPhoto

🔥 Новый кейс! 🔥 Об оформлении сцены и пространства на DPFA 2025 В первой части кейса подробно рассказали о процессе создания видео для танцевального перформанса. И даже отобразили в картинках как происходила расскадровка. Во второй части показали общий визуал сцены для номинаций, амбассадоров, интерактива со зрителями и каким было Цифровое Деловое пространство в нашем оформлении. С небольшой приятной дрожью в паль

11❤‍🔥9🔥6😍2

16 Apr 2026, 15:25 UTC200 views41 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Редкий короткий отпуск, когда я не на каком-то диджитальном мероприятии, а дома в родном городе, куча планов с подругами и родственниками, много дел по-домашнему, нужно везде успеть по инстанциям. В первый же день насморк и последующая температура до 38,5. Все планы коту (не моему) под хвост. Лежу, "отдыхаю", ем мороженое и пью чай, изредка играю и смотрю ютубчик. Спасибо, дура 🔫

💔2310🫡5🍌2💩1

2 Apr 2026, 16:24 UTC272 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💥 На правах амбассадора всех зову на Удаленку! Первая удаленка прошла очень насыщенно. Были полезные лекции, экспериментные мастер-классы в прямом эфире, содержательные вопросы и одна релакс лекция со шрифтами (кайфанули все). Мы очень долго не хотели отпускать организаторов и спикеров и болтали почти до ночи. 🤣 И потом. Дома, в кроватке или удобном креслице, хоть в пижаме, хоть в костюме, ешь вкусняшки, пьешь чаеч

❤‍🔥10🔥8🫡6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sofisofism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 464,703 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“София и софизм|5:0” (@sofisofism), 114 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sofisofism.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.