Нет ну что за милашность, я просто счастлива ⭐️
custom 52964182319285323262custom 54047544526430627401
Signed [☕]"sᴏᴅᴀ_!?

Channel
@sodAazp_iiw
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
116subscribers
+109 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004351982071 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sodAazp_iiw |
| Description | 𐌿ρᥙʙᥱᴛᥴᴛʙую нᥲ ʍ᧐ᥱʍ κᥲнᥲ᧘ᥱ! <3 Мᥱня ɜ᧐ʙуᴛ С᧐дᥲ, я ᴦᥲчᥲ ᥲнᥙʍᥲᴛ᧐ρ ᥙ худ᧐жнᥙκ ⟣ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ⟢ Вᥰ ᧐ᴛ 40 ᥰдᥰ, ʙ᧘ нᥱ дᥱ᧘ᥲю Щᥰ κᥲнᥲ᧘ - @sodAzpiie Фан хэштег #SD Нᥱᴛу ʙ ᧘ᥲᥔκᥱ |
| Created | 5 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sodAazp_iiw |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
@sodAazp_iiw was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 17:22 | 116 | no change |
| 9 Nov 2026, 16:47 | 116 | +102 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 14 | +5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 9 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 7 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 7 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (5 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,012 |
| Reactions total | 77 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
81 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5296418231928532326 | 34 | 42.0% | |
| custom 5384516875981989173 | 15 | 18.5% | |
| custom 5404754452643062740 | 15 | 18.5% | |
| custom 5940414540347872280 | 7 | 8.64% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 6.17% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 2.47% | |
| custom 5407036742429583977 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| custom 5863991240902579312 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.23% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sodAazp_iiw. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (35.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Нет ну что за милашность, я просто счастлива ⭐️
custom 52964182319285323262custom 54047544526430627401
Signed [☕]"sᴏᴅᴀ_!?
Вы это в таком варианте лор не прочитаете ХЕХЕХЕ. Там ещё одна часть будет, а потом я буду делать текстовую вариацию и оформленную для вас.
custom 54047544526430627403custom 52964182319285323261
Signed [☕]"sᴏᴅᴀ_!?
Ещё 4 человека и я сделаю вам лотку или игру на звёзды, как захотите 🤩
custom 52964182319285323264
Signed [☕]"sᴏᴅᴀ_!?
Мне не нравится как то блин 😋
Signed [☕]"sᴏᴅᴀ_!?
Я первый реквест нарисовал в традишке поцаны, в жизни это чуть лучше выглядит, ну ладно ☺️ Следующий пойду рисовать на 25 реакций, ото стате плохо, и рисовать его завтра, ото поздно уже 👀 Я дальше лениться.
custom 529641823192853232612custom 53845168759819891736custom 54047544526430627406
Signed [☕]"sᴏᴅᴀ_!?
Прок я с тебя в шоке, спасибо блин за звездошки 🥹 Теперь у меня 191 звёзда в канале есть, осталось 9 до 200 🙂
Signed [☕]"sᴏᴅᴀ_!?
Тем более Это традишка...
custom 52964182319285323262
Signed [☕]"sᴏᴅᴀ_!?
Posted without readable text
custom 59404145403478722802custom 54070367424295839771custom 58639912409025793121
Signed [☕]"sᴏᴅᴀ_!?
Хорошо после реквеста начну писать.
Signed [☕]"sᴏᴅᴀ_!?
Что хотите сегодня чтобы я сделала помимо начать реквест?
The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed [☕]"sᴏᴅᴀ_!?
Напоминаю. А я пока первый реквест пойду рисовать.
Signed [☕]"sᴏᴅᴀ_!?
Давайте когда нас будет 120 хотя бы, я сделаю лоту на звёзды 🙂 Или игру.
custom 53845168759819891736🔥4
Signed [☕]"sᴏᴅᴀ_!?
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @sodAazp_iiw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что хотите сегодня чтобы я сделала помимо начать реквест?
The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“С᧐дᥲ ᥰᥙщᥱʙᥲя_☕️” (@sodAazp_iiw), 116 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sodAazp_iiw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.