Channel name was changed to «فانوس»

Channel
فانوس
@socratic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
36subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001016292657 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @socratic |
| Description | مجموعه ی از مطالب سیاسی-فلسفی-اجتماعی - علمی |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/socratic |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 36 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 36 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 September 2019 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 117
- Videos
- 8
- Links
- 76
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 42s
- Average length
- 42s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2019 to 17 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Future is yours! 😋 1. Very important https://t.me/TimeFarmCryptoBot?start=Zx37TFf7LqZjiWG6 2. Impressive https://t.me/pixelversexyzbot?start=138936945 3. t.me/BlumCryptoBot/app?startapp=ref_FkyXJuDEaU 4. Coming Soon
Channel name was changed to «Blum, hamster, time farm ,...,pixel, Combo»
فانوس pinned Deleted message
Euglena یوگلینا این تک سلولیها که اندازهای در حدود پنج صدم میلیمتر دارند را میتوان با هر میکروسکوپ نوری-عبوری در بزرگنمایی صد برابر به راحتی دید در یک توضیح بسیار مختصر میتوان گفت: فتوسنتز فرآیند تبدیل آب و دیاکسید کربن با کمک انرژی خورشید به شکر(غذا) و اکسیژن است
https://t.me/joinchat/Aj3dKmriyy8zMzJk گزیده هایی از کتاب های معتبر امروز جهان @siavoosh1350
👍1
🔵پادکست عالی پیشرفت تکنولوژِی در آینده 🔴تکینگی (singularity) جایی است که علم بصورت جنون آمیز رشد می کند. ⚫️تا 25 سال دیگر قدرت پردازش مغز انسان 3 میلیون برابر می شود. @riazi100_ir
#شهود_بیچاره_ما “Even classical Newtonian mechanics is no pushover for our wretched intuition. Who would have imagined that, if you drop one bullet as you fire another horizontally from a rifle, the two bullets will hit the ground simultaneously?” (Books do Furnish a Life, P39) اگر یک گلوله رو مثلا از ارتفاع یک متری رها کنیم. و همزمان گلوله دیگری رو از همان ارتفاع بصورت افقی توسط تفنگ شلیک کنیم، چه کسی فکرشو میکرد …
استدلال یکم؛ +اگر فلانی لباس زیر آبی پوشیده باشد آنگاه جوراب سبز نیز پوشیده است. -فلانی جوراب سبز پوشیده است نتیجه: فلانی لباس زیر آبی نیز پوشیده است. اکثر مردم فرآیند نتیجه گیری فوق را درست میدانند! استدلال دوم؛ اگر به فاضلاب بیفتم آنگاه دوش خواهم گرفت. من دوش گرفتم. نتیجه: من به فاضلاب افتاده ام. روند نتیجه گیری همانند استدلال یکم است، اما اکثر مردم متوجه ایراد استدلال دوم میشوند. چرا؟ چون انسان ها همانند ماشین …
👍1
داستان ییدیش معروف(Yiddish) در مورد مغازه داری را در نظر بگیرید که به مغازه اش آمد و شعارهای موهنی را یافت که که با اسپری روی پنجره مغازه نوشته شده بود. پنجره را پاک کرد، اما همین اتفاق دوباره در روز بعد اتفاق افتاد. بنابراین نقشه ی کشید: در روز سوم، منتظر ماند تا لات های محلی پیدایشان شود و کار کثیفشان را انجام دهند. سپس برای تشکر بخاطر کارشان به آنها ۱۰ دلار داد.روزه بعد دوباره از آنها تشکر کرد ولی به آنها ۵ دلار د…
یکی از معروفترین مثالهای «پارادولیا». تصویر صورت انسان در ماه است
پاریدولیا (Pareidolia) یک سوگیری روانشناختی است که در آن فرد، اشیاء، صداها، الگوها و شکلهایی را که میبیند به صورت معنادار تعبیر میکند. از مثالهای معمولی که در این باره زده میشود میتوان به این موارد اشاره کرد: دیدن چهره در ابرها، دیدن چهره در ماه، شنیدن پیامهای ناشناخته وقتی نوار یا صدای ضبطشده بهصورت برعکس پخش میشود و ....
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @socratic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@socratic named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فانوس” (@socratic), 36 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/socratic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.