Channel
@socofreligion
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,073subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001604667724 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @socofreligion |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/socofreligion |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 2,073 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 2,072 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 2,073 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 2,072 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,289 |
| Reactions total | 92 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
92 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 42 | 45.7% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 22.8% | |
| custom 5415607667496336202 | 11 | 12.0% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 7.61% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 5.43% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 2.17% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.17% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.17% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В Республике Корея придумали приложение, прокладывающее маршрут через тень, оно набирает большую популярность из-за аномальной жары в стране, газета The Korea Herald. Приложение учитывает положение солнца во время запроса пользователя и рассчитывает, как в этот момент будет падать тень от зданий и деревьев. Также оно расскажет, какая часть пути в процентах будет пролегать в тени.
👍6🤩2🥰1
[Restricted access] Upenieks L., Eagle D. E., Holleman A. Childhood Abuse and the Mental Health of Seminary Students: The Mediating Role of R/S Struggles // Review of Religious Research. 2026. Vol. 68(2). P. 207-230. Было обнаружено, что учащиеся семинарии подвергаются более высокому риску подвергнуться жестокому обращению в детстве по сравнению с населением США в целом, а также демонстрируют проблемы с психическим …
🤔2👍1custom 54156076674963362021
Междисциплинарная научная конференция «Коморбидное поле 3.0: социальное благополучие, здоровье и медицина во множественных контекстах» 🏙️ Центр сравнительных исследований социального благополучия ВШЭ 📆 3-5 декабря 2026 г. 📌 Предлагаемые направления для обсуждения: 1. Медицинская культура: институции, практики, агенты и социальные ресурсы здоровья 2. Репрезентации здоровья, болезни, тела пациентов и качества жизни ме…
❤4🔥2👍1
Коллеги в Санкт-Петербургском университете приглашают на конференцию памяти Марианны Михайловны Шахнович (1957 — 2025) в очном и дистанционном формате. ✔️22 сентября 2026 г. оканчивается регистрация для участников и слушателей, а сама конференция ✔️22-23 октября.
Летняя школа «Современные социальные исследования неравенства» 🏙️ Научно-учебная лаборатория психологии социального неравенства ВШЭ 📆 24-27 августа 2026 г. Цель Летней школы — создать пространство взаимодействия между представителями НКО и профессиональных помогающих организаций, молодыми исследователями и лекторами для решения актуальных исследовательских задач московских некоммерческих организаций. ⏰ 10 августа …
❤5🔥4custom 54156076674963362023
📚📚📚🍵
❤3🥰1custom 54156076674963362021
Уважаемые коллеги! Приглашаем Вас принять участие в работе Всероссийского круглого стола «Методологические стратегии исследования религиозности» 💡 Центр исламоведческих исследований Академии наук Республики Татарстан 📆 9 октября 2026 г. 🌆 г. Казань Цель круглого стола – создать пространство для аналитического обсуждения существующих методологических подходов и совместными усилиями построить целостную карту их возмож…
👍1
Новая книга: Социология цифровых неравенств: методологические вызовы и эмпирические результаты: [монография] / Н. С. Воронина, Е. Н. Гасюкова, Е. А. Григорьева [и др.]; отв. ред. М. Ф. Черныш, Ю. Б. Епихина; ФНИСЦ РАН. – М. : ФНИСЦ РАН, 2026. – 524 с.
👍3
😁😁😁
👍13😁1
📌Открыт приём заявок на Летнюю школу «Болгарский диалог культур» – 2026 в новом формате! 🌐 С 24 по 28 августа в Болгарской исламской академии пройдёт Летняя школа «Болгарский диалог культур». В этом году проект, реализуемый при поддержке Группы стратегического видения «Россия – Исламский мир», пройдёт в обновлённом формате – как акселератор практических проектных решений в сфере межрелигиозного согласия и диалога ку…
👍1
Sexuality and the Catholic Priesthood: The 'Chaste' Caste (Routledge Studies in the Sociology of Religion) by Marco Marzano Based on interviews with Roman Catholic seminarians, priests and former priests, as well as with managers of seminaries, teaching staff, psychologists and psychiatrists, this book considers the lives of the clergy, beginning with the period before entering the seminary. With attention to both h…
Уважаемые коллеги! Приглашаем Вас принять участие в работе Всероссийского круглого стола «Методологические стратегии исследования религиозности» 💡 Центр исламоведческих исследований Академии наук Республики Татарстан 📆 9 октября 2026 г. 🌆 г. Казань Цель круглого стола – создать пространство для аналитического обсуждения существующих методологических подходов и совместными усилиями построить целостную карту их возмож…
👍3❤1custom 54156076674963362021
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @socofreligion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 237,116 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Studia Societatis” (@socofreligion), 2,073 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/socofreligion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.