Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СоцМедиаМаркетинг

Channel

СоцМедиаМаркетинг

@socmediamarketing

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

403subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001899474294
TypeChannel
Username@socmediamarketing
CreatedBetween 1 November 2022 and 30 June 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/socmediamarketing

Growth

402403402.56 August 2026 — 402 subscribers6 August 2026 — 402 subscribers13 August 2026 — 403 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 402–403 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:47403+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:45402no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:38402first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
94.5%
avg views ÷ 403 subscribers
Avg views / post
381
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held9 (17 June 202624 July 2026)
Views total381
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

127 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4837.8%
3829.9%
👍2015.7%
🎉86.30%
👏86.30%
❤‍🔥32.36%
👀10.787%
😁10.787%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC381 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Каждый сммщик знает: рилсы бренда — всегда слегка русская рулетка. Никогда не угадаешь, когда стрельнет! Но так уж вышло, что у нас вместе с GloraX обычно стреляет, и весьма метко 🎯 Поэтому снова хвастаемся: наш совместный кейс в шорт-листе WOW Awards 2026! 🏆 Гармоничная синергия наших команд уже который год держит нас в 🔝

8👍7🔥7🎉3

16 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC177 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥11👏5❤‍🔥3👍1😁1

8 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC170 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

На рынке нейросетей все отчетливее определяется обратный тренд — пока маркетологи спорят, заменит ли ИИ SMM-щиков, Ford, IBM и некоторые крупные банки мира начали возвращать сотрудников, которых ранее сократили ради внедрения алгоритмов. Причина, как нетрудно догадаться, простая — ИИ не справляется с нюансами контекста. Буквально об этом же мы активно рассказываем в своих материалах, на встречах с девелоперами и отк

👍54🔥2

2 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC175 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В 2026 году в SMM девелопера главный ресурс — не рендеры, а честность В новой статье на REPA разбираем, почему сейчас важно сфокусироваться не на продаже, а на лояльности и спокойствии потребителя. Вы узнаете: • Почему нужно вывести диалог в приоритетный формат коммуникации • Как вести себя на площадках — официальных и не очень • Почему суть продукта важнее инструментов Материал по ссылке

5🔥3👍2

29 Jun 2026, 09:36 UTC394 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Важный инсайт: несмотря на регулярные вызовы от рынка для маркетологов в недвижимости, прямо сейчас открыто одно важное окно возможностей — в блоке GEO-продвижения шансы на выход в поле широкой видимости равны для всех компаний без исключения. В нашем свежем исследовании можно в этом наглядно убедиться. Мы оцифровали реальность: прогнали 300 реальных промптов через 6 нейросетей и разобрали более 14 000 упоминаний за

7👍4🔥4

24 Jun 2026, 13:51 UTC161 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мы привезли с форума «Движение» немало интересных инсайтов. Но сегодня поговорим о том, что стало бесповоротно ясно: репутация девелопера — это не отзывы на агрегаторах и не пресс-релизы. Это нематериальный актив, который напрямую влияет на стоимость и скорость продаж. И охранять его нужно так же системно, как финансовые потоки, работая именно с ним, а не с последствиями, выложенными в сеть в виде роликов. Основате

🔥74👀1👍1

19 Jun 2026, 16:42 UTC134 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Блок соцсетей на нашем выступлении в рамках экспертного дня "Точки касания" привлек много внимания (и это с учетом, что выступали мы почти вечером). Немного инсайтов и важных мыслей:

3

19 Jun 2026, 16:42 UTC166 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ss_shizaPhoto

Главная ошибка девелоперов в 2026 году — продолжать делать контент по правилам 2022-го. Заработало! Подписчик прислал контент одного из выступлений на форуме. ▪️ Люди устали от контента. 65% пользователей уже скрывают рекламные и брендированные публикации даже в привычных соцсетях. Контента стало слишком много, а эмоционального ресурса у людей — слишком мало. ▪️ Классическая контент-матрица больше не работает.

🔥4👏3

17 Jun 2026, 10:05 UTC187 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как же громко мы вчера о себе заявили, ребята! Какой это был драйвовый день! Интереснейшие спикеры, масса сильных кейсов, горячие дискуссии и, конечно, полный зал вас — наших дорогих гостей, которые провели целый день в нашей компании. Очень это ценим, спасибо ❤️ «Точка касания» на «Движении» — это случилось и это было круто👍

🔥107🎉5

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @socmediamarketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СоцМедиаМаркетинг” (@socmediamarketing), 403 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/socmediamarketing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.