🔥TeleTop 频道推荐 📢签盾🥇 苹果签名 🥇 安卓去毒 🥇... 📢币圈行情分析频道 📢4K AI Wallpapers 📢热点新闻 刑事犯罪🌎 📢币盘盘口丨外汇盘口丨外卖盘口丨海外盘口招... 📢领英~FB_GV _TP_Textsms... 📢电报引流|持续增粉 📢🥇 Moood.Vape外贸电子烟工厂 📢曝光新闻|黑料新闻|东南亚新闻 📢我是青青子 💎广告推荐 📢182体育综合平台,电子,棋牌,百家乐,... 📢飞哥数据🌍SDK·DPI⚙️钉钉💰支... 📢东南亚今日头条|新闻|爆料|悬赏|通缉|... 🔍互推公示 🪧流量互推说明

Channel
国外ip 海外ip 静态ip 动态ip socks5代理 http代理
@socks5_1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
170subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002453416041 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @socks5_1 |
| Description | 国内IP/国外IP/代理IP/动态IP/socks5代理/静态IP |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/socks5_1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 170 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 170 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 171 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 29 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.4%
- avg views ÷ 170 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 17.8
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (29 December 2025 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 71 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 44
- Links
- 20
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @socks5_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 636,317 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Aaaa11000000 · 7211 post曝光新闻|黑料新闻|东南亚新闻
@bg767 · 101 post【情报局查档】老牌查档/司法/定位/流水/开同/户籍👨✈️
@dvadwasfasf · 8,1321 postCosplay写真|封疆疆V
@fengjiangjv · 751 post瓜次元 Ι 吃瓜日常🍉
@Guaciyuan · 191 post皇冠百家乐 亚星百家乐 欧博百家乐 百家乐代理
@oubo8991 · 81 post西港陪冰女孩/5个小时
@peubing · 341 post欧易模拟器7号代理对接👾
@tonghuanshun · 461 post维基:求职招聘:(企业人才的沟通桥梁)
@weijizhaopin · 40,7991 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@TeleTopOrg · 33,00312 posts曝光新闻|黑料新闻|东南亚新闻
@bg767 · 101 post币圈行情分析频道
@BQHQ_FenXi · 171 post4K AI Wallpapers
@DarkAIBG_4K · 2961 post电报引流|持续增粉
@dghahahg5674542 · 561 post我是青青子
@qingqingzia · 671 post🔥 182体育 福利频道(PG电子)
@vip182ty · 10,4951 post🏆飞哥数据🌍SDK·DPI⚙️钉钉💰支付宝💬微信🚀源头招商
@xiaoqianshuju · 11,9671 post热点新闻 刑事犯罪🌎
@xinwen663 · 3,1751 post东南亚大事件 金三角大事件 缅甸大事件
@yuenanU · 216,1751 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@socks5_1 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“国外ip 海外ip 静态ip 动态ip socks5代理 http代理” (@socks5_1), 170 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/socks5_1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.