Channel
@sociologyarabic
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,943subscribers
+80 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001306405263 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sociologyarabic |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sociologyarabic |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 8,943 | +10 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:02 | 8,933 | +18 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 8,915 | +18 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 8,897 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 8,895 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 8,892 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 8,888 | +5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 8,883 | +13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 8,870 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 8,869 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 8,864 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 8,863 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 8,863 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 23 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
148 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 110 | 74.3% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 20.3% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 5.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2026 to 6 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ما السياق الاجتماعي لهذه المقولة؟ ابن باجة عاش في الأندلس في القرن الثاني عشر، في مجتمع يسوده الصراع السياسي والديني. هذا السياق مهم لأن المفكر لا ينتج أفكاره في فراغ، بل كرد فعل على واقعه. تفترض المقولة أن المجتمع يُقيّد الفرد بدلاً من أن يحرره. وهذا يستدعي السؤال الكلاسيكي في علم الاجتماع: هل المجتمع وسيلة لتحقيق الإنسان لذاته، أم أنه عائق أمامه؟ دوركهايم كان سيختلف جذرياً مع ابن باجة، لأنه يرى أن الفرد لا يكتمل …
❤24👍7👏1
الجيل ليس مجرد فئة عمرية، بل هو جماعة تتشكل من خلال تجربة تاريخية مشتركة.. ماذا يعني بذلك عالم الاجتماع كارل مانهايم؟ https://sociologyarabic.com/articles/karl-manhiem-sociology
👍3❤2
تعرف على العالم بيتر تيرشين..
❤4
يقف علم الاجتماع ليحاول الإجابة على هذا السؤال، مقدماً إطاراً تحليلياً يكشف كيف تتشكّل السلوكيات الإجرامية تحت تأثير العوامل الاجتماعية المحيطة. حيث أن الجريمة ليست حكراً على طبع فردي، بل هي في كثير من الأحيان انعكاس لواقع اجتماعي مأزوم. https://sociologyarabic.com/articles/sociology-of-crime
❤5
يرى عالم الاجتماع مانويل كاستليس أن السلطة لم تعد تقوم فقط على القوة المباشرة أو المال، بل على القدرة على توجيه تدفق المعلومات والتحكم في وسائل الاتصال التي تُشكّل وعي الناس وآراءهم. فالدولة ووسائل الإعلام والمؤسسات الكبرى تمارس نفوذها عبر ما تنشره أو تخفيه، كما تمارس المنظمات الصغيرة سلطة مماثلة داخل حدودها من خلال تنظيم المعرفة وتحديد من يملك حق الوصول إليها.
❤17👍2
ما هي ظاهرة ترييف المدن؟ ترييف المدن أو "التمدين الريفي" هي ظاهرة اجتماعية جغرافيّة تشير إلى تحول بعض الأحياء أو المناطق الحضرية في المدن إلى طابع ريفي، سواء من حيث البنية العمرانية، أو الأنماط السلوكية، أو أنماط العيش والتفاعل الاجتماعي. ما سبب الظاهرة؟ غالباً نتيجة الهجرة الريفية إلى المدن، خاصة عندما تكون هذه الهجرة مكثفة وغير منظمة، ولا يصاحبها اندماج حقيقي في الثقافة الحضرية أو تخطيط عمراني مناسب. وبدلاً من أن …
❤28👍5👏3
🔖 تعرّف على الأكاديمي والمفكر السوري عزيز العظمة..
❤5👏3
يرى عالم الاجتماع الألماني "هارتموت روزا" أن المشكلة في عصرنا ليست فقط أننا نعيش بسرعة، بل أن المجتمع نفسه قائم على منطق "التسارع المستمر". فالتكنولوجيا تتطور بسرعة، وأنماط الحياة تتغير بسرعة، وإيقاع يومنا يصبح أكثر ضغطًا. هذا التسارع الدائم يؤدي إلى الشعور بالاغتراب: علاقات أسرع لكنها أضعف، إنجازات أكثر لكنها أقل معنى. باختصار: نحن لا نعيش فقط في زمن سريع، بل في نظام يجعل السرعة شرطًا للبقاء. ما رأيكم؟
❤25👍13👏1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @sociologyarabic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“علم الاجتماع - Sociology” (@sociologyarabic), 8,943 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sociologyarabic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.