National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 866 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @afishasochi24. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
60 measurements spanning 96 days, net +497. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,361–32,401 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 14:36
32,067
-49
9 Nov 2026, 02:54
32,116
-13
6 Nov 2026, 16:25
32,129
+9
5 Nov 2026, 14:56
32,120
+26
4 Nov 2026, 13:29
32,094
-10
3 Nov 2026, 12:09
32,104
-19
2 Nov 2026, 08:29
32,123
-9
1 Nov 2026, 06:55
32,132
-13
31 Oct 2026, 03:49
32,145
-5
30 Oct 2026, 03:06
32,150
-23
28 Oct 2026, 23:30
32,173
-12
28 Oct 2026, 00:40
32,185
-21
26 Oct 2026, 22:18
32,206
-20
26 Oct 2026, 00:17
32,226
-5
25 Oct 2026, 02:27
32,231
-7
24 Oct 2026, 01:49
32,238
+2
23 Oct 2026, 02:46
32,236
-3
22 Oct 2026, 01:19
32,239
-8
20 Oct 2026, 20:59
32,247
-13
18 Oct 2026, 18:37
32,260
first reading
Engagement
937 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 172 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.45%
avg views ÷ 32,067 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,430
222 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.547%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
225
of 937 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 198 of 222 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
937 (5 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
316,729
Reactions total
1,547
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 21:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈25,600
Videos
≈10,500
Links
≈19,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4h 05m
Average length
1m 05s
Measured directly from 226 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,409 reactions across 791 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,881
38.9%
👍
896
12.1%
👎
569
7.68%
🤬
381
5.14%
👏
332
4.48%
🙏
313
4.22%
🔥
286
3.86%
😱
260
3.51%
😢
186
2.51%
🤡
160
2.16%
😁
157
2.12%
😭
130
1.75%
🤣
123
1.66%
❤🔥
77
1.04%
🕊
64
0.864%
⚡
59
0.796%
🤪
57
0.769%
👀
48
0.648%
🤯
48
0.648%
🏆
46
0.621%
29 further kinds
336
4.54%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 821 of the 937 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,409 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 937 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 930 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sochi24tv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 937 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.77%
26 of 937 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
26
posts carrying an erid · 24 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,430
over 26 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,430
over 904 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2RanyoJzHaK
3
22 September 2026
29 September 2026
2RanykF7pKd
1
19 October 2026
19 October 2026
2RanykQTc1y
1
16 October 2026
16 October 2026
2RanykUYkh1
1
26 October 2026
26 October 2026
2RanykgSvDZ
1
6 August 2026
6 August 2026
2RanykjQERh
1
17 August 2026
17 August 2026
2RanykqEYFM
1
15 October 2026
15 October 2026
2Ranym1efJC
1
3 November 2026
3 November 2026
2Ranym7jqFh
1
26 October 2026
26 October 2026
2RanymCASnw
1
20 October 2026
20 October 2026
2RanymCWFkP
1
12 October 2026
12 October 2026
2RanymYeUsm
1
15 October 2026
15 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 12 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 937 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 47 of 225 posts held from the last 30 days (20.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🏨 Сочи временно освободил санатории и детские лагеря от туристического налога
Депутаты Городского Собрания Сочи приняли новую меру поддержки курортной отрасли. С 1 октября по 31 декабря 2026 года от уплаты туристического налога освободят организации, которые оказывают санаторные услуги, а также размещают детей в оздоровительных учреждениях.
Льгота распространяется на объекты, включённые в единый реестр классифициро…
8-9 декабря в Сочи пройдет Международный туристский форум в Сочи SIFT-2026 - профессиональная площадка, посвящённая развитию внутреннего и въездного туризма в России.
Главная тема SIFT-2026: «Внутренний и въездной туризм в новой реальности».
Как меняется туристический рынок? Какие изменения необходимо учитывать уже сегодня, чтобы обеспечить устойчивость отрасли и создать условия для её развития в 2027 году? Эти воп…
🍈 В Сочи начался сезон фейхоа
На сочинских рынках сейчас настоящий фейхоа-бум: плоды собирают корзинами, угощают ими знакомых и заготавливают на зиму. Почти как кабачки — только по-сочински! 😄
Фейхоа родом из Южной Америки — её родина находится на территории Бразилии, Парагвая, Уругвая и Аргентины. На Черноморском побережье Кавказа растение появилось более ста лет назад и прекрасно прижилось благодаря мягкому субтр…
😟 Туристка пострадала при падении со скал на горе Ачишхо
Несчастный случай произошёл в горах Сочи на высоте около 1 900 метров. Женщина сорвалась со скал и получила травмы.
Из-за сложных погодных условий эвакуация оказалась особенно трудной: спасатели около десяти часов несли пострадавшую на носилках через снегопад и сильный ветер. После этого её доставили в больницу Красной Поляны.
Обстоятельства происшествия и с…
Заявление Совета «Союза друзей Сочи» от 12.11.2026г.
Краевое БТИ по инициативе администрации Краснодарского края с 1 января 2027 года увеличивает кадастровую стоимость земель в Сочи в 3 раза. Новая оценка многократно превышает рыночную, что приведет к резкому росту аренды, цен на товары и услуги (отелей, санаториев, ферм, кафе, магазинов) и угрожает разорением бизнеса.
Хотя право пересмотра оценки у края есть, мера…
Доброе утро, Сочи!☀️
В ноябре особенно приятно отправиться на прогулку в парк: туристов меньше, воздух свежий, а деревья удивляют разнообразием осенних оттенков. Сочи умеет быть красивым в любое время года. 🍂
Интересный факт:
В сочинском Дендрарии собраны растения из разных уголков мира. Здесь можно увидеть представителей флоры Азии, Северной и Южной Америки, Австралии и других регионов.
Пусть сегодняшний день ста…
Первым спектаклем 46-го сезона РУСДРАМа станет «Собачье сердце», сообщил гендиректор театра Ираклий Хинтба.
Режиссером постановки стал Владимир Золотарь. Премьерные показы пройдут 12 и 13 ноября.
В новом сезоне зрители также увидят драму «Портрет Дориана Грея», поставленную Дмитрием Акимовым — премьерные показы состоятся 18 и 19 декабря.
Кроме того Хинтба рассказал, что 20 ноября в театре пройдут показы эскизов ре…
📸 Природа без границ: в горах Сочи открылась выставка японского фотохудожника
В парке «Времена года» на Курорте Красная Поляна состоялось открытие необычной выставки под открытым небом. Экспозиция «Природа без границ» объединила работы всемирно известного японского фотохудожника Фукуды Тосидзи.
На фотографиях запечатлены удивительные пейзажи Японии, Дальнего Востока и арктических регионов России. Через объектив авт…
❄️ Сочи готовится к зиме: на уборку дорог направят 140 млн рублей
В Красной Поляне уже выпал снег, поэтому вопросы зимнего содержания дорог особенно актуальны. Подготовку к холодному сезону обсудили на совещании под председательством главы Сочи Андрея Прошунина.
На зимнюю уборку автомобильных дорог предусмотрено 140 миллионов рублей. К работам подготовили более 250 специалистов, около 70 единиц спецтехники для горн…
🐻🌳 В горах Сочи создают фруктовые сады — чтобы медведям было проще найти еду в лесу
В Сочинском национальном парке начали высаживать сады из местных плодовых растений. Проект должен помочь восстановить природную кормовую базу и сократить число случаев, когда медведи в поисках пищи выходят к населённым пунктам и курортным территориям.
Первые более 100 саженцев высадили на кордоне Пслух. Здесь будут расти кавказская …
Доброе утро, Сочи!🧡
Ноябрьское утро у моря особенно красиво: лёгкая дымка над водой, свежий бриз и мягкий свет осеннего солнца. В такие моменты хочется никуда не спешить и просто наслаждаться жизнью. 🌊
Интересный факт: В Сочи растёт множество вечнозелёных растений — магнолии, лавры, пальмы и олеандры. Поэтому даже в ноябре город не теряет своей зелени и южного характера.
Пусть сегодняшний день принесёт спокойствие…
❤9👍5😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 937 posts we hold for @sochi24tv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@sochi24tv edited 14 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
6 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @sochi24tv as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
29 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
24 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
19 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The 6 most recent of 18 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А когда вы обычно начинаете готовится к Новому году?)
31 декабря 😁30%
С ноября скупаю все игрушки и украшения 🎊10%
За меня все делает партнер 🤪3%
С декабря потихоньку украшаю дом и покупаю подарки 🎁59%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как считаете, нормально ли «сбросить человека» с такого аттракциона насильно?
Ужасно! За такое надо привлекать к ответственности🤬66%
А зачем она туда пошла тогда? Ну скинул и скинул, она же заплатила за это!13%
Надо было найти компромисс: например, поговорить с ней спокойно и успокоить.22%
Затрудняюсь ответить.4%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 937 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@sochi24tv named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@sputnikabkhazia named in 1 post, 20 October 2026 – 20 October 2026 · confirmed gone 11 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Вести Сочи @novostisochi · 20,001 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 September 2026
Жизнь Сочи @livesochi · 32,214 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
Сочи Официальный @officialsochi · 20,745 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 September 2026
Sochi Today 🌀 @sochi_today · 23,167 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 September 2026
Мэр Сочи Андрей Прошунин @agproshunin · 38,089 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
⚡️ Сочи Онлайн @sochi_online · 120,710 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Сочи №1 @soch01 · 18,832 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 October 2026
Новости | Сочи | Адлер | Красная поляна | Подслушано @sochi03 · 40,233 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
Сочи Дэй | Афиша Сочи @sochi_day · 41,533 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
Любимый❤️Сочи @love_sochi · 73,449 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Водоканал Сочи @wcups · 20,710 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 September 2026
Адлер ❤️ Сочи Новости @Adler_Sochii · 29,973 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
Подслушано Сочи @sochi_podslushano · 44,543 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
ЧП Сочи 🔞 @chp_sochi · 328,016 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 10 August 2026
Сочи с огоньком @sochitop1 · 41,217 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
Сочи История @sochi_history · 40,555 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
FunSochi - Красная Поляна онлайн @funsochi · 30,518 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 September 2026
Парк слонов @elephantparkrussia · 20,753 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 September 2026
Сириус @sirius_okrug · 30,298 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
Курорт «Газпром Поляна» @gazprom_resort · 42,079 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
Новости Краснодара | Сочи Анапа @krasnodar1 · 30,922 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Новости Сочи 24” (@sochi24tv), 32,067 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sochi24tv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.