Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Соккер-радар

@soccerradar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,019subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001649248969
TypeChannel
Username@soccerradar
Created3 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/soccerradar

Growth

3,0193,0293,0246 August 2026 — 3,029 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,029 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,028 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,022 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,019 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,018–3,031 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:543,019-3
10 Aug 2026, 02:123,022-6
6 Aug 2026, 22:403,028-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:023,029no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:573,029first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

654 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27341.7%
🔥15323.4%
👍15022.9%
🤔152.29%
❤‍🔥131.99%
😁91.38%
🤝91.38%
👎50.765%
🤮40.612%
🤡30.459%
🤷‍♂30.459%
🥱30.459%
👏20.306%
💩20.306%
😢20.306%
😱20.306%
🤯20.306%
👌10.153%
💯10.153%
😡10.153%
1 further kind10.153%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 654reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2025 to 21 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @soccerradar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 December 2025 to 21 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Mar 2026, 17:40 UTC≈2,100 views44 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Процент отраженных пенальти Вратари топ-5 плюс РПЛ с сезона-2021/22 1. Агкацев - 64% (7 из 11) 2. Мерет – 42% (5 из 12) 3. Монтипо - 28% (6 из 16) 4. Булка - 36% (4 из 11) 5. Де Хеа – 35% (6 из 17) 6. Шченсны – 33% (5 из 15) .... 76. Максименко – 6% (1 из 16) Ну и так далее В выборке вратари, которым за этот период били 10 пенальти и больше @soccerradar

🔥30👍84👏2

10 Feb 2026, 09:47 UTC≈3,170 views56 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Позиции, на которых играл Бернарду в «Ман Сити», и процент минут на каждой. Осталось выйти хотя бы раз левым ЦЗ – и будет флеш-рояль. @soccerradar

🔥399😁5🤯2👍1

9 Feb 2026, 08:04 UTC≈2,780 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не все обратили на это внимание после победы «Сити», но Гвардиола вчера оооочень сдержанно хвалил команду. И, кажется, даже немного разнес Холанда и Мармуша. «Во втором и первом тайме мы несколько раз пытались выходить через длинные передачи. Мы бились. Омар и Эрлинг были там [среди адресатов]. Я знаю, насколько это невероятно сложная задача – выигрывать такие мячи у Конате и Ван Дейка, ничего не говорю. Но во второ

👍21

7 Feb 2026, 06:20 UTC≈2,560 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Атлетик подсветил интересную особенность Холанда: это форвард первой половины сезона. К середине результативность (голубая линия) как правило резко проседает. Выйдет ли в старте на «Ливерпуль»? @soccerradar

19🤔5💯1

28 Jan 2026, 10:46 UTC≈28,600 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Простое доказательство, почему длинные ауты так популярны. При этом риск пока минимальный: количество допущенных контратак слабо коррелирует с длиной аута. При этом не все так просто: многие бездумно копируют тренд, чем бесят главного амбассадора длинных аутов Томаса Гроннемарка (первый в мире тренер по аутам, работал с «Мидтьюлландом», «Ливерпулем», «Лейпцигом» и «Брентфордом», сейчас в «Арсенале»). «Можно было б

🔥2513👎1

23 Jan 2026, 07:59 UTC≈2,500 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Открывшая счет команда побеждает в АПЛ почти в 65% случаев, соответственно теряет преимущество в 35% случаев. Но это в среднем. А детали интереснее. Например, «Сити» в этом сезоне не спас ни одной игры, когда пропускал первым. Но таких было всего четыре. «Арсенал» в пяти случаях из семи избежал поражения. Но ярче всех на этой картинке выглядит «Астон Вилла»: пропустив первой, она шесть раз из одиннадцати добивалас

30👍12

19 Jan 2026, 11:11 UTC≈2,900 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Никогда прежде центрфорварды в АПЛ не забивали так редко. На графике от The Times – данные за историю наблюдений с 2010-го, но можно предположить, что в девяностых и начале нулевых результативность не проседала ниже 0,17 гола за игру. Вряд ли это случайность, дело точно не в реализации. Форварды реже бьют по воротам: 1,33 удара, в 2012-м было 2,01. И вообще реже взаимодействуют с мячом: в среднем менее 25 раз за иг

29👍10

26 Dec 2025, 06:49 UTC≈3,080 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Текст для Спортса про то, как стандарты меняют футбол. Судя по комментариям, не все считают, что тренд на голы с угловых и штрафных бьет по зрелищности. А вы? https://www.sports.ru/football/blogs/3371162.html @soccerradar

🤝95🤷‍♂3👍2❤‍🔥1

25 Dec 2025, 12:55 UTC≈4,430 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Рандомный факт, на который навела колонка ESPN о переоцененности форвардов. Средняя результативность «Ман Сити» в АПЛ за 5 сезонов до трансфера Холанда – 2,48 гола за 90 минут Средняя результативность «Ман Сити» с Холандом Сезон-2022/23 – 2,42 гола ❌ Сезон-2023/24 – 2,47 гола ❌ Сезон-2024/25 – 1,87 гола ❌ Сезон-2025/26 – 2,24 гола ❌ То есть ни разу за четыре сезона с Холандом «Сити» не повторил среднюю результати

28🤔10💩2❤‍🔥1👍1

24 Dec 2025, 10:01 UTC≈2,220 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Здесь мы говорили, как отразить качества Мартина Субименди через метрики, а здесь можно почитать о Субименди и других игроках «Арсенала» детальнее. Знаю, что среди моих читателей есть много болельщиков «Арсенала», поэтому предновогодняя рекомендация посвящена очень приятному каналу об этом клубе — The Cannon's Call | Arsenal F.C. Внутри спокойное и методичное осмысление происходящего с клубом на футбольном поле, по

6👍3❤‍🔥1🔥1

24 Dec 2025, 07:01 UTC≈1,890 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кто самый умный полузащитник АПЛ? На прошлой неделе Артета очень хвалил Мартина Субименди. «Он – игрок позиции, которая связывает всех. Твоя задача на ней сделать людей вокруг себя и команду в целом лучше – мыслить так же, как тренер. А чтобы этого добиться, нужно очень хорошо понимать игру, почему она развивается в том или ином направлении. Думаю, у Мартина есть качества для этой роли, и у нас в полузащите есть вс

👍3315🔥3❤‍🔥1🤡1

22 Dec 2025, 10:28 UTC≈1,430 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @football_Italy

Всем Спортсом составили сборную мира за 25 лет. От Нойера до Роналду. https://www.sports.ru/football/blogs/3371684.html

👍62👎2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @soccerradar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 525,721 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Соккер-радар” (@soccerradar), 3,019 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soccerradar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.