3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,025–3,028 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 02:31
3,025
-3
6 Aug 2026, 21:31
3,028
+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:04
3,027
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
77.7%
avg views ÷ 3,025 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,350
1 post measured
Reaction rate
9.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held
17 (5 May 2026 – 16 July 2026)
Views total
2,350
Reactions total
221
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 00:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,186 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,380
56.9%
custom 5224708023435404637
671
16.0%
custom 5409008750893734809
620
14.8%
🤣
446
10.7%
🤡
69
1.65%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,186reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 17 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheCannonsCall. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 May 2026 to 16 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Томас Тухель вчера был настолько раздражающим, что даже меня вывел из спячки раньше положенного.
Да, я болел за Англию на этом чемпионате мира, но ее бесславный вылет, окончательно оформленный провалом Тухеля во втором тайме, довольно быстро отходит на задний план, когда понимаешь, чего мы на самом деле лишились.
Тухель украл у нас возможность раз и навсегда закрыть все споры о Сака и Месси. Теперь, чтобы определит…
Остыл чуток после матча.
Не знаю, как бы складывалась игра, если бы Хавертц не забил в самом начале матча, но последовавшая адаптация под гейм-стейт меня совершенно не удовлетворила.
Играть оставалось более 80-и минут, у «Арсенала» было минимальное преимущество в счете, но весь план был сведен к полному отказу от риска.
Самое смелое, что предложил Артета, как обычно игра без мяча: встречали высоко и четверкой (кон…
Впечатлился новым интервью Джоша Кронке.
Мы давно привыкли слушать рефлексии Артеты и игроков — то есть людей, которые живут внутри футбола ежедневно. Здесь же появляется взгляд владельца клуба, дополняющий объем представлениям о внутрянке клуба в последние годы.
Особенно интересно читать про период перестройки. Из интервью хорошо чувствуется, насколько хрупким все это было: как сильно в клубе боялись снова потерят…
ГДЕ СМОТРЕТЬ ФИНАЛ ЛЧ?
Мы нашли самое атмосферное место для просмотра финального матча Лиги Чемпионов – на DVOR CUP SUMMER PICNIC!
Двор кап – футбольный фестиваль среди брендов, креативных пространств, агентств и проектов.
В программе фестиваля:
– просмотр финала ЛЧ на открытом воздухе и большим экраном в комфортабельной зоне WINLINE;
– футбольный турнир;
– музыкальная программа и фуд-корты.
Билеты бесплатные – в…
В среду Эберечи Эзе рассчитывал подписать контракт с «Тоттенхэмом». Это был бы, несомненно, удачный шаг: лондонский клуб, играющий в Лиге чемпионов, между прочим. Для его карьеры это означало шаг вперед.
Но прежде чем принять решение, ему нужно было сделать один телефонный звонок. Эзе позвонил Микелю Артете.
Прекрасно помню это начало из статьи Джеймса Макниколаса. Наверное, если убрать эмоции и смотреть исключител…
Помню свои ощущения, когда Микель Артета стал главным тренером «Арсенала».
Это был волнительный момент: молодой тренер без опыта работы главным получает возможность в клубе, в котором отыграл последние и, пожалуй, лучшие годы своей карьеры — капитаном. Для меня, как для болельщика, это назначение казалось попыткой наладить атмосферу в клубе и вокруг него. Привести своего человека, очень перспективного, так еще и уче…
Подумать только: уже сегодня «Арсенал» может стать чемпионом Англии, если «Сити» не победит «Борнмут».
Возможно, кому-то покажется странным, но я вообще не испытываю предвкушения. Наоборот — поймал себя на почти иррациональном ощущении тревоги.
Есть какое-то странное опасение, что «Сити» действительно не выиграет и чемпионство свалится на «Арсенал» уже в предпоследнем туре.
Последние месяцы существовали в режиме п…
«Арсенал» побеждает «Вест Хэм» в матче, который с высокой долей вероятности определил исход чемпионской гонки АПЛ.
Впереди остались матчи с «Бёрнли», который, конечно же, очень захочет внести свою лепту в гонку, но это все еще «Бёрнли», и «Кристал Пэлас», для которого будет работать та же мотивация (если она вообще будет, потому что у них свои задачи на европейской арене).
Первые минут 15 были многообещающими: моме…
Влад делает успехи!
Мы уже рассказывали про его тяжелую болезнь. Но благодаря начатому курсу по восстановлению Влад наконец-то побежал. Пока неуверенно, но он это сделал.
Это большой результат тяжелой работы маленького человека и вашей поддержки. Лечение продолжается, до сбора финальной суммы осталось найти 275 000 рублей.
Реквизиты для тех, кто может помочь: 89251741666 (Сбербанк) — Игорь Т. (Папа Влада)
Желаем …
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @TheCannonsCall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 838,145 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@TheCannonsCall named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@thecannoscall named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Cannon's Call | Arsenal F.C.” (@TheCannonsCall), 3,025 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheCannonsCall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
