Channel
@sobirovnursulton
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
172subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003421877163 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sobirovnursulton |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sobirovnursulton |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 172 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 173 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 178 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 177 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 177 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 196 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
252 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 90 | 35.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 51 | 20.2% | |
| ❤ | 43 | 17.1% | |
| 🔥 | 42 | 16.7% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 8.33% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 1.19% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.794% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Baxt nimada oʻlchanyapti? Ijtimoiy tarmoqlardagi postlar bilanmi? Har bir yaxshi narsani ommaga ko’rsatish majburiyat emas. Ba’zi narsalar shaxsiyligicha qolgani qadrlidir. Muammo baxtli vaziyatni ulashishda emas, balki uni boshqalarga nimanidir isbotlash uchun ulashishda. Baxt isbot talab qilmaydi. Lekin uni boshqalar bilan bo’lishish ham uni soxtalashtirmaydi. Muhimi nima uchun ulashayotganing. Agar “haqiqatan …
❤6💯3🔥2❤🔥1
Siz shovqin ichida o’zingizni yoqotib qo’ygansiz Va sizning muammoingiz ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda emas, siz o'zingiz bilan yolg'iz qolishdan qo'rqasiz. Tan oling, siz o’zingizdan zerikasiz va aynan shu uchun har bir bo’sh bo’lib qolgan daqiqalarizi har xil video, o’yinlar, bo’lar bo’mas, sizga umuman aloqasi yo’q yangiliklar bilan to’ldirishga harakat qilasiz. Miyya band bo’lib tursa bo’ldi, maqsad bitta - bu o’zingizdan…
❤4🔥3👏1
Ota-ona chin dilidan farzandi uchun qilgan duosi farzandni shunday sakinatga olib boradiki, farzand bu sakiynati ila g’oyibdan muvaffaqiyatlarga erishadi!
💯8❤4❤🔥2
Nega Chiroyli Qizlarni Yigiti Bo’lmaydi? Hayotda kulgili paradoks mavjud: ko’p chiroyli qizlar yolg’iz bo’lishadi. Sababi shunchaki kulgili: hamma yigitlar bir xil o’ylaydi. “Bunaqa qizning aniq yigiti bor, menga yo’l bo’lsin”. Qizga hatto bir og’iz so’z aytolishmaydi. Lekin men sizga hozir qizlar haqida gapirmoqchi emasman. Bunday holat hayotda ham ko’rinadi. Biz ko’pincha eng zo’r loyihalarga yoki eng zo’r ish…
💯11❤3❤🔥2🔥2
Boshqalar sizni hurmat qilishini xohlasangiz: - Belgilangan uchrashuvga vaqtida boring. Kechikayotgan bo’lsangiz oldindan ogohlantiring - Masalahat so’rab kelishsa, yashirmasdan chin ko’ngildan bering - Menga nima foyda emas, mendan nima foyda deb yashang. - Matohingizni ko’z-ko’z qilib faqatgina matohi yo’qlarni hayron qoldirasiz. - “Bilmayman” deyishni odat qiling - Agar xohlamasangiz “yo’q” deyishni o’rganin…
❤🔥5❤1🔥1
Qaniydi hammani blogi bo’lsa Instagramda rasmlar qo'yiladigan emas. Telegramda fikrlar qo’yiladigan blog. Rasm tashqarini ko’rsatib beradi. Blog ichkarini. Tashqari aldamchi. Ichkari baribir o’zini bildirib qo’yadi. Hammani blogi bo’lsa, hamma yutadi. Bir odam bilan tanishasiz. Blogini topib o’qib chiqasiz. Fikrlashini bilib olasiz. Eski va yangi fikrlarini solishtirasiz. O’sadiganmi, yo’qmi tushunib olasiz. O’…
💯9❤🔥4❤2🔥1🤝1
baxt va og’riq doim balansda yuradi hayot yaxshilashgani sari, oddiy narsalar yoqmay qoladigan bo’lib qoladi. qiyin hayotda yashayotganlar, kichkina narsalardan ham xursand bo’lishadi. restoranda ovqati sovuqroq kelganiga janjal qilgan to’qlar. toʻyib ovqatlangani uchun bir kun xursand yurgan ochlar. odam qay darajada bo’lmasin o’zida yo’q narsalarni ko’raveradi. Baxt oshib bormaydi. oʻsha eski gap: Baxtning 99…
💯8❤🔥2❤1🔥1
Talabalik davrimda chamasi restoranda ofisiant bo’lib ishlaganman. Mijozlarni asl xarakterini bizga qiladigan muomalasidan, farosatini esa ovqatlanib ketgan stol holatidan bilib olish mumkin edi. Korxonangizga hodim, o’zingizga umr yo’ldosh yoki biznes hamkor qidirayotgan bo’lsangiz, oddiygina ularni biror joyga ovqatlanish uchun taklif qiling. Shu ikki holatni qunt bilan kuzating.
💯10👏5🔥2❤1🫡1
Aksariyat insonlar, “xarobadan chiqqan millioner” kabi voqealarni sevib tinglashadi. Chunki boyni yanada boyishi hech kimga qiziq emas. Lekin… Boyni boyish ehtimoli, kambag’alni boyish ehtimolidan ANCHA yuqori. Shuning uchun haqiqatga tik boqish o’rniga, imkoni deyarli yo’q narsalar bilan o’zimizni ovutishga harakat qilamiz. Siz muvaffaqiyatli deb hisoblagan insonlarni 99,9%, boy oilada tug’ilgan yoki boy oila b…
🔥7💯4👏2
"Miyaga har doim bosim va stress kerak. Ko'pchilik stressdan qo'rqadi va qochadi. Aslida biz stressdan emas, hech qanaqa muammo yoki problema yo'qligidan qochishimiz kerak. Stress sportcarlarda yoqilg'i bo'lsa, insonni o'sishi, rivojlanishi uchun shunchalik muhim hisoblanadi va albatta tanlov o'zingizda. Kimdir 'stress olsam men kasal bo'laman, mazam qochib qoladi yoki tez qariyman' deb o'ylaydi. Kimdir 'stress olsam…
❤4💯4🔥2
"Aqlli ko‘p pul topyapti. Hamma narsani bilganlar ko‘p topmayapti. Qancha ko‘p networking bo‘lsa, tanish-bilish bo‘lsa, shuncha odamlar ko‘p topyapti. Bitta narsani tushunish kerak, eng muhim ko‘nikma bu – yangi insonlar bilan tanishish va muloqot qilish ko‘nikmasi. Men shunaqa insonlarni ko‘rganman, o‘zining yo‘nalishi bo‘yicha hech narsani bilmaydi, biznes boshlagan, lekin biznesdan juda ko‘p xabari yo‘q. Marketin…
❤🔥4💯3❤1👏1🔥1
Nazorat qilish illyuziyasi Siz butun zinapoyani koʻrish oʻzingizni xavfsizroq his qilishingizga yordam beradi deb oʻylaysiz, vaholonki bu narsa sizni joyingizdan qimirlatmay ushlab turadi. Tushunmagan boʻlsangiz gptga yuboring va tushuntirishini ayting.
👏4🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sobirovnursulton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 174,202 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Собиров” (@sobirovnursulton), 172 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sobirovnursulton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.