Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сергей Андреев. Основатель.

Channel

Сергей Андреев. Основатель.

@sobiraukorabli

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

567subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001905981113
TypeChannel
Username@sobiraukorabli
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sobiraukorabli

Growth

5675715697 August 2026 — 571 subscribers8 August 2026 — 571 subscribers16 August 2026 — 568 subscribers23 August 2026 — 567 subscribers31 August 2026 — 568 subscribers9 September 2026 — 567 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 566–572 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 12:56567-1
31 Aug 2026, 17:36568+1
23 Aug 2026, 23:46567-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:18568-3
8 Aug 2026, 03:31571no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:34571first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

495 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥19539.4%
👍10521.2%
10421.0%
💯316.26%
🤣244.85%
122.42%
😁122.42%
👏71.41%
🤔30.606%
❤‍🔥20.404%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 495 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2025 to 20 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jan 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,110 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не скажу что было очень больно , скорее - забавно 😆 Попался ресурс, который анализирует телеграм каналы. Там несколько форматов. Я, конечно, выбрал прожарку)! 📊 Результаты анализа канала от @ScratchAuthorEgoBot 🎯 Канал: @sobiraukorabli 🔥 Анализ троллинга: Перед нами типичный представитель касты "просветленных основателей-отцов", который способен превратить любую поездку на лифте в бизнес-кейс, а просмотр боевика

🔥20🤣149👍72😁2

8 Jan 2026, 12:38 UTC≈1,060 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Поставить шкуру на кон это страшно (и/или) выгодно? Рынки всегда развиваются в одной логике. В каждый период какие-то подходы являются нормой. Если ты этого не делаешь, то с тобой просто не работают (так называемый уровень гигиены). А какие-то дают конкурентное преимущество. Пока конкуренты не расчухали, взяли на вооружение и это тоже не стало нормой. Приводил примеры раньше. Мне всегда интересно попробовать уг

🔥11👍6💯41🤔1

3 Jan 2026, 14:32 UTC832 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как эксперту вырваться из логики таксиста ? После прошлого поста в кулуарах возникла дискуссия на эту тему. Ответ простой. Надо перестать продавать за деньги свое время и построить бизнес. Но тут есть два радикально отличающихся сценария. 1. Построить систему, в которой его экспертиза будет продуктом. 2. Его ( ее) экспертиза будет инструментом, ингредиентом. А продуктом будет что-то совсем другое. Объясню на просты

🔥9👍7💯41

2 Jan 2026, 11:37 UTC682 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Логика таксиста. Или поиск нетривиальных моделей масштабирования. Мне часто встречается два бизнес-архетипа, которые сильно усложняют жизнь их носителям. Первый архетип - таксиста. Его базовая логика - что бы заработать в два раза больше, надо работать в два раза больше. Часто так ( с небольшими вариациями) рассуждают эксперты , фрилансеры. В малом бизнесе чаще вижу другую аналогию - с директором таксопарка. Его

9🔥8👏7

2 Jan 2026, 11:37 UTC524 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Нишевание

💯74🔥2

2 Jan 2026, 11:37 UTC503 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Вайт лейбл

👍5🔥53

2 Jan 2026, 11:37 UTC518 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Чем « услуговые»компании отличаются от товарных.

🔥64👍4

30 Dec 2025, 10:05 UTC≈1,320 views52 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Обычно мы смотрим на жизнь глазами отличника. И тем самым - делаем себя несчастными. Как то мы с детьми обсуждали тему отличников. И возник вопрос- они счастливее двоечников? Я сказал свое мнение - что как раз наоборот! Для двоечника двойки - норма. И если вдруг получил 3 а то и 4 - это счастье ! А для отличника норма - пятерки. И любая 4 и тем более 3 - катастрофа , причина для страданий , крушение надежд. Значит,

🔥28🤣10😁9👍41

21 Dec 2025, 07:41 UTC564 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Погрузившись в «зазорную» тему ( через ваши комментарии и ИИ) я начал ее структурировать. А сами «зазоры» - типизировать. Что бы превратить их в инструмент и удобнее им пользоваться. Это привычный для меня подход. И понял, что выбор «зазоров» зависит от целей , которые ( сознательно или не очень) ставят перед собой эксперты и компании. Например психологи ( заранее извиняюсь за упрощенный подход) У них могут быть

💯10🔥10👍53

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sobiraukorabli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Рецепты: 🍪 Выпечка | Десерты | Салаты
@recepty_vypechka · 31,277
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сергей Андреев. Основатель.” (@sobiraukorabli), 567 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sobiraukorabli.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.