Channel
@soAzalla
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
384subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002041776470 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @soAzalla |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/soAzalla |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 384 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 383 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 383 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 21 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (21 February 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 581 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
484 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6003464462684657666 | 151 | 31.2% | |
| custom 6041819628739499141 | 86 | 17.8% | |
| custom 6008019829552847316 | 83 | 17.1% | |
| custom 6039708806932337263 | 49 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5775976142552964300 | 41 | 8.47% | |
| custom 6039672686257378949 | 33 | 6.82% | |
| custom 6039887395967473337 | 21 | 4.34% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 2.69% | |
| custom 5996942730939338895 | 4 | 0.826% | |
| custom 6041586820037219644 | 3 | 0.62% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 484reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Не этно, а идентичность: как Antalvála переосмысливает чеченский культурный код Основательница Antalvála в письменном интервью — о первой коллекции, сомнениях, детстве в Чечне и моменте, когда она поняла: бренд вырос из её личного мира. Интервью можно прочитать, перейдя по ссылке или заглянув в наш инстаграм Antalvála ©️
custom 60418196287394991417custom 60415868200372196443
Если вы когда нибудь задумывались, как звучит чеченский язык на уровне C2, то вот:
❤🔥13custom 57759761425529643001custom 60418196287394991411
🐦⬛ Govza - это сообщество чеченских артистов и креативных специалистов Цель проекта - объединение артистов и профессионалов творческих индустрий, которые зачастую существуют и работают разрозненно. Сообщество позволит участникам узнавать друг друга, обмениваться опытом, находить единомышленников и осознавать себя частью более широкой профессиональной и культурной среды Мы стремимся создать пространство, в котором …
custom 600346446268465766612custom 59969427309393388954custom 60398873959674733374custom 60418196287394991413
Чеченская электронная библиотека нашлась в телеграм, хочу порекомендовать тем, кому нужно https://t.me/chechen_library
custom 604181962873949914112custom 60034644626846576663custom 60398873959674733372
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 577597614255296430015custom 60418196287394991418custom 60397088069323372635custom 60398873959674733372
Первый чеченский фильм на Каннском кинофестивале «Имаго» - это фильм, в котором личная история превращается в универсальное высказывание о памяти, идентичности, корнях и семьи. Главный герой - сам режиссер, родившийся в Чечне, но выросший в эмиграции. Он получает от матери участок земли в грузинской долине, граничащей с Чечней. Семья надеется, что герой сможет обосноваться, построить дом и вернуться к традициям, ве…
custom 600346446268465766623custom 577597614255296430011custom 60396726862573789496custom 60397088069323372632
г. Грозный — Блокнот/дневник защитников города Грозного, 1994–1995 гг. Может быть, война окончится через неделю или месяц, может — через год, а может — через пять лет… Я не знаю, и это страшно. Что останется от нас, от республики? Может, поколение выживших будет жить в мире — и мы очень надеемся, что так и будет. Если этот блокнот сохранится, пусть это напечатают во всех газетах. Гордитесь нами. Сидя здесь, в под…
custom 600801982955284731618custom 60034644626846576667custom 60418196287394991416custom 60398873959674733372custom 57759761425529643001custom 60396726862573789491
Чеченские старики готовятся оборонять Грозный, 1994 год
custom 603970880693233726326custom 600801982955284731614custom 600346446268465766613custom 57759761425529643002
File, posted without a caption
custom 60398873959674733377custom 60034644626846576666custom 60418196287394991413custom 60396726862573789491
https://t.me/soAzalla/513
custom 60418196287394991417custom 60034644626846576664custom 60398873959674733374custom 60080198295528473161custom 60396726862573789491
Ахахаха мое любимое
custom 57759761425529643007custom 60418196287394991417custom 60034644626846576664
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 600346446268465766615custom 60396726862573789499custom 60418196287394991417custom 60080198295528473163custom 57759761425529643001custom 60397088069323372631
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @soAzalla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 461,852 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@soAzalla named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Azalla ©” (@soAzalla), 384 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soAzalla.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.