Channel
@snowdroplightproject
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
58subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003774970270 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @snowdroplightproject |
| Description | Медиа-проект для онкопациентов и их близких. Бережно о самом важном. Разделяя то, что трудно нести одному. |
| Created | 27 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/snowdroplightproject |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 58 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 58 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (27 March 2026 – 16 July 2026) |
| Views total | 48 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
117 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 25.6% | |
| 💘 | 28 | 23.9% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 21.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 7.69% | |
| 🕊 | 9 | 7.69% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 5.13% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 5.13% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 3.42% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Маленькая аудитория и тихие шаги🩵 Мы часто думаем о том, как устроен мир вокруг нас. В нём всё заточено под масштаб. Под миллионы просмотров, под громкие цифры, под истории, которые можно упаковать в кричащий заголовок и продать. Чем больше охват — тем значимее проект. Чем громче сказано — тем быстрее заметят. Но мы работаем в теме, где всё иначе. Наша аудитория — узкая. Это не миллионы. Это люди, которые столкну…
❤8💘4🕊2
Дорогие друзья 🩵 Второй выпуск уже собрал 700 просмотров суммарно по всем площадкам. Для большого медиа это, возможно, капля в море. А для нас — важный и тёплый сигнал. Каждый просмотр значит, что где-то сейчас человек или его близкие ищут ответы, поддержку и понимание в непростом онкологическом пути. И если наше видео хоть немного снимает страх, убирает мифы и даёт ощущение, что «я не один в этом» — мы на правильн…
❤9💘4🔥4
🩵СВЕТ ПОДСНЕЖНИКА #2 вышел Дорогие друзья, сегодня вышел второй выпуск, и он получился очень важным. Мы много говорим о том, как на самом деле работает паллиативная помощь в онкологии. Потому что вокруг неё до сих пор куча страхов и заблуждений. Многие думают, что если подключили паллиатив — значит «всё, борьба окончена». Но это совсем не так. Наоборот. Паллиатив часто помогает человеку лучше переносить основное л…
❤6💘3🔥3
🌱Месяц «Свет подснежника»: первые шаги и самое честное, что у нас есть Ровно месяц назад мы выпустили наш первый проект. Страшно, волнительно, но безумно важно. Для «Света подснежника» этот месяц был временем первых ошибок, первых тёплых слов от вас и понимания: маленькими шагами — тоже вперёд. Мы не обещаем взрывного роста. Мы обещаем быть рядом. Шаг за шагом, выпуск за выпуском. Нам хочется, чтобы наше простран…
💘6❤🔥4👍3❤1
Когда мы задумывали «Свет подснежника», мы понимали: это не просто контент. Это попытка дотянуться до каждого, кто сейчас заперт в своём страхе и одиночестве из-за диагноза. Алгоритмы соцсетей любят развлекательное видео, но нам очень важно, чтобы наш честный разговор врача и пациента увидели именно те, кто прямо сейчас ищет поддержку — в больничных коридорах или в бессонные ночи дома. С момента выхода первого выпу…
🔥9❤4💘4🥰4
Наш первый разговор. О чем он? Когда мы планировали первый выпуск «Света подснежника», мы не хотели делать «передачу о болезни». Мы хотели честного разговора двух людей, которые оказались по разные стороны одного диагноза. В этом видео встретились те, кто обычно видит друг друга только на приеме, где время ограничено протоколом. Наши первые герои: Татьяна Истиховская (https://t.me/EknNlZjP7tcxZDBi) — соавтор смыс…
👏6💘4🔥2❤1
Как появился «Свет Подснежника» Знаете это чувство, когда мир вокруг резко становится чужим? Будто все продолжают куда-то бежать, пить кофе и смеяться, а ты застрял в моменте, где звучит диагноз «онкология». В эту секунду самое страшное даже не болезнь, а оглушающее одиночество. Кажется, что никто по-настоящему не понимает, что ты чувствуешь, и даже в кабинете врача ты просто «случай из практики». Мы создали проект…
🔥7🕊7❤🔥5👍3💘3❤1
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @snowdroplightproject. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 343,230 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Свет Подснежника” (@snowdroplightproject), 58 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/snowdroplightproject.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.