🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 От AFELLLO 📉📉📉📉📉📉📉📉📉 Приветствую всех в наборе на ивент ^^🫶 "палитра" ⬇️Для тех кто не знает что это⬇️ Палитра - это челлендж для художников, суть которого заключается в том, что рисунок нужно будет выполнить строго в определённых цветах🤓 📉📉📉📉📉📉📉📉📉 Правила ивента: ✅не использовать посторонние цвета в работе (лайн и блики можно делать другим цветом если нужно, можно использовать оттенки цветов палитры, но не т…

Channel
WARNING Рей ⚠️
@snick_errs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
33subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004499818588 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @snick_errs |
| Description | кулебяка весь контент в канале не относится к каким либо сектам или пропагандам и создается в развлекательных целях. каждый автоматически подтверждает это заходя в канал |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 14 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/snick_errs |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 33 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 33 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 228.5%
- avg views ÷ 33 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 75.4
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 10.9%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (14 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 754 |
| Reactions total | 80 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 01:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 39
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 9
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
89 reactions across 9 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 34.8% | |
| 🍓 | 17 | 19.1% | |
| custom 5283105267829997242 | 6 | 6.74% | |
| custom 5294253632835833753 | 4 | 4.49% | |
| custom 5379772410293661777 | 4 | 4.49% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 4.49% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 4.49% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 4.49% | |
| custom 5188625822793095372 | 3 | 3.37% | |
| custom 5471971021537981428 | 3 | 3.37% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 2.25% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.25% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.25% | |
| custom 5456328986869124718 | 1 | 1.12% | |
| custom 5471907739489826360 | 1 | 1.12% | |
| custom 5472235080422290621 | 1 | 1.12% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
File, posted without a caption
ну что вам сказать. как всегда скетчбук, как всегда планшетные скетчи для броу😏 сегодня ваще ещкере день🌟 как то в своем темпе двигаюсь меня все устраивает🤪 надеюсь половина мью не забила на мое существование ЛОЛ🐈 домой через 5 дней🌟🌟
❤4💘2👾1
хай гайз, помните я говорила про journal pounch cover или как они там называются😐. в общем на днях купила все для этой штуки и сделала что то подобное🌟. еще купила новый скетчбук и попыталась чото начиркать💬 ну короче дээ, дней через 10 домой🌟🌟
❤5🍓3custom 52831052678299972422🕊1
последни день июля йоомайо как так🌟🌟 хотелось бы до 15 августа закончить свой скетчбук, а целей я своих не достигаю поэтому правильно, только назад, ни шагу вперед💪 я кстати ваще балдею тк тут за полтора месяца набрала половину той подписоты что в прошлом канале набиралось годами емае☠☠ я чо настолько приподнялась в жизни😎 это мои кенты кстати крутые да ага я знаю
❤5custom 53797724102936617774custom 51886258227930953723🍓1👾1
File, posted without a caption
🕊2🍓1
🏴☠️пытаюсь бороться с оставшимися 19 страницами скетчбука которому уже года полтора?..🤩 спасает только пинтерест🫡 у меня в Яндекс музыке сегодня тыща треков, вот можете посмотреть чо там есть✌️ бам⬅️⬅️
custom 52831052678299972424custom 52942536328358337534❤2🍓1🕊1custom 54719077394898263601custom 54719710215379814281
напоминаю//для модных реакций https://t.me/boost/snick_errs
custom 54719710215379814282❤1custom 54563289868691247181custom 54722350804222906211
🖇вот такие кули мули первое еще не закончила дааа ещё посидим ещё посидим я кстати вот думаю прем купить на месяц, скажите норм щас покупается или нет? а то я помню блокали всю эту систему, напишите в комментах..😵💫 кстати выложила рисуночки в тик ток, посмотрите там пж, ссылочку скопируйте... а то у меня просмотры ваще все стали слетать, беспредел🔫🔫
❤8🍓4
//русреал школьнеке как мы все любим ураа✋✊ ваще внеплановый персонажи, по вайбам от нечего делать сами придумались. вроде свага👍 #апокалипсиссерыедни
🍓6🤯4❤2💘1🔥1
сегодня у нас опять #Portfolioday ☢ йо щас буду репостить✌️
❤4🥰2🍓1💘1🔥1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @snick_errs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,263,078 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WARNING Рей ⚠️” (@snick_errs), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/snick_errs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.