Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Снег пишет и читает =] Ксения Снег

Channel

Снег пишет и читает =] Ксения Снег

@sneg_kc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

368subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001732862298
TypeChannel
Username@sneg_kc
DescriptionКсения Снег - детская писательница и путешественница здесь я пишу о творческом процессе, путешествиях, детских перлах. разыгрываю открытки и книги (свои). много читаю и делюсь списком прочитанных книг (как взрослых, так и детских) Для связи: @SnegXenia
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/sneg_kc

Growth

3686 Aug 2026, 18:01 — 368 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:48 — 368 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:016 Aug 2026, 20:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 367–369 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 20:48368no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:01368first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.0%
avg views ÷ 368 subscribers
Avg views / post
114
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
23.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held8 (9 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total685
Reactions total158
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
739
Videos
165
Links
149

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

212 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 520888474114669761611252.8%
custom 52066410974759107703617.0%
🌭2411.3%
🗿219.91%
custom 5415952905557527755198.96%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC76 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

На улицах Белграда обнаружены две классные-колбасные писательницы: Алёна Мирьянич и Наталья Хари. Мы провели три дня под расплавленным небом, изучая город и друг друга. Любую поездку, каким бы красивым не был город/место, решают люди. Согласны? Начало августа мне запомнится леопардом, красным, лимонадом, колбасным.

custom 520888474114669761616custom 52066410974759107709🌭6🗿1

30 Jul 2026, 16:42 UTC116 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Раз перелет, два перелет, три, четыре. Лето. Которое лето обещаю себе не писать, которое лето пишу, как угорелая, потому что… Есть кайф в процессе и есть кайф в завершении процесса. Убежала из дома подальше от детей — поставить точку в новой рукописи. Там города как действующие лица, а творчество как возможность проявиться. Не ново для мира, но ново для меня. #снег_пишет

custom 520888474114669761616🌭5

28 Jul 2026, 15:10 UTC123 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Фильм, книга, песня Что зацепило меня в последнее время: 🎥 посмотрела в самолете фильм «Вертолет» про якутскую глубинку, куда не добраться никак, кроме как на вертолете. Молодая семья приезжает на малую родину мужа, чтобы показать пятимесячную малышку бабушке и дедушке. Весна. Половодье. Связь с большой землей обрывается, а малышка подхватывает дизентерию. Я проревела большую часть фильма. Сыграли на всех моих стра

custom 520888474114669761610🌭5

25 Jul 2026, 05:14 UTC117 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Написала пост в Радио Колбасе про книжные магазины Сербии. Не пропустите. Там много красивых обложек.

custom 520888474114669761615custom 520664109747591077010🗿6custom 54159529055575277552

22 Jul 2026, 17:51 UTC127 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 520888474114669761611custom 54159529055575277555🗿1

20 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC126 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Немного Грузии в ленту Жить неделю с семьей в количестве 13 человек; Гулять по 15 тыс шагов ежедневно; Сходить на квиз два раза; Сходить в серную баню; Съездить в горы; Дегустировать хинкали в разных местах; Кататься на канатках; Отметить юбилей мужа. Доне ✔️

custom 520888474114669761625custom 520664109747591077010🗿5

12 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC153 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я с сестрой VS Эрлинг Холанд. Так жалко, время над ним беспощадно

custom 541595290555752775512🗿7custom 52066410974759107707

9 Jul 2026, 15:40 UTC259 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ребят, большое доброе дело можно сделать уже сегодня. Поддержать наш социальный проект — выпуск обнимательного сборника (там есть мой взрослый рассказ). Сейчас на планете проходит сбор средств для его выпуска: https://planeta.ru/campaigns/obnimayu Чтобы сделать верстку и напечатать тираж нужно 350 тыс. рублей (сюда еще входят налоги и сборы). Как нам можно помочь: 🤩 Отправить друзьям ссылку на сбор https://plane

custom 520888474114669761619🌭8🗿1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @sneg_kc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 370,740 of 1,550,472entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Снег пишет и читает =] Ксения Снег” (@sneg_kc), 368 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sneg_kc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.