Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мы — буквы, с нами текст

@snamitext

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

991subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001743240372
TypeChannel
Username@snamitext
DescriptionНе только главное, но даже всё.
Created26 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/snamitext

Growth

9917 Aug 2026, 08:53 — 991 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:03 — 991 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:537 Aug 2026, 09:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 990–992 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 09:03991no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:53991first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 20 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.0%
avg views ÷ 991 subscribers
Avg views / post
288
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held8 (20 April 202625 July 2026)
Views total1,151
Reactions total52
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
241
Videos
13
Links
34

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

197 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12261.9%
🔥4522.8%
👍178.63%
🤔52.54%
🤷‍♂52.54%
😱21.02%
👎10.508%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 197reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 09:20 UTC246 viewsread 7 August 2026

Пообщались с Николаем об том как есть и как должно быть

25 Jul 2026, 09:20 UTC207 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ryndin_nikolaiPhoto

Новый подкаст на ютубе с умными людьми. Так же в других сетях🔽🔽🔽 вк - https://vk.ru/art___obstrel рутуб - https://rutube.ru/channel/71035773/ дзен - https://dzen.ru/art_obstrel

8👍3😱2

17 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC314 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @smenafmVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥9👍43

17 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC384 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @smenafm

Posted without readable text

15👍6🔥2

12 May 2026, 07:37 UTC859 views76 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мы тут с Николаем Рындиным объединили методы, и сделали такую штуку. По мне так вышло блестяще, сразу чувствуется рука мастера. Живопись, а не хухры-мухры! А вы что скажете? ПОКАЗАЛОСЬ, 2026 холст, масло 50х100 см

47🔥22🤷‍♂5👍1🤔1

10 May 2026, 11:29 UTC722 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

До 17-го мая есть возможность посетить выставку «ВМЕСТЕ». Это важный для индустрии проект интеграции искусства в социальные учреждения, а именно в онкологическую больницу Nº62 в Сколково. Выставка показывает пример, как можно сделать такие сложные места более дружелюбными и человечными. По масштабу и многообразию (более 200 работ от 70 художников из разных стран) выставка скорее напоминает биеннале. Часть помещений,

17👍3

6 May 2026, 09:21 UTC545 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @smenafmPhoto

До объявления результатов конкурса — 25 дней Пока ждём, сохраняйте список любимых фильмов от куратора «Смены» Владимира Абиха. Пишите в комментариях, что уже смотрели и хотели бы больше от нас такого контента✨

10🔥7👎1

20 Apr 2026, 13:33 UTC728 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сразу три новых принта или один принт в трёх исполнениях🤔 Фото 1. Шелкография на советских обоях фабрики «Красная роза» (рис. №32), 40х50 см, тираж 15 + 2AP Фото 2. Шелкография на советских обоях Вельгийской бумажной фабрики (рис. №524), 40х50 см, тираж 15 + 2AP Фото 3. Шелкография на толстенной хлопковой бумаге 450 гр, 40х50 см, тираж 30 + 3AP Интересно, что сами обои выполнены в технике высокой печати (предполо

22🔥5🤔4

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @snamitext. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мы — буквы, с нами текст” (@snamitext), 991 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/snamitext.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.