Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Air pollution refugees, Stop 5G, geoengineering, cruelties & chronic diseases epidemics

@smogrefugees

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

504subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001473823625
TypeChannel
Username@smogrefugees
Created21 June 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/smogrefugees

Growth

5045085066 August 2026 — 508 subscribers6 August 2026 — 507 subscribers6 August 2026 — 507 subscribers14 August 2026 — 504 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 503–509 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:56504-3
6 Aug 2026, 18:34507no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:42507-1
6 Aug 2026, 09:42508first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
108.8%
avg views ÷ 504 subscribers
Avg views / post
549
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 November 20245 August 2026)
Views total1,097
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC355 viewsread 6 August 2026

2023 : EU Commission calls for global talks on risks of climate engineering technology, as countries fail to curb emissions. 2024 : Morocco's cloud seeding program raises concerns in Spain. 2025 : UK government starts funding highly controversial outdoor solar geoengineering experiments despite enormous risks, and leads the way with 4-mile-long artificial reflective clouds. 2026 : Extreme heat is drying Europe out. h

Signed Dirk Elsthout 🇳🇱 NL (This account is banned 🤬 from public chats since 2023, presumably by corporatist cyber intrusion)

20 Jul 2026, 08:19 UTC742 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

AI kan ook goed cartoons maken.

Signed Virus = NON-contagious nanoparticle airpollution

14 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC166 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed Virus = NON-contagious nanoparticle airpollution

11 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC156 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Virus = NON-contagious nanoparticle airpollution

11 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC142 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Virus = NON-contagious nanoparticle airpollution

12 Jun 2026, 12:49 UTC680 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

[email protected] Corona-verhoor met ex-premier Rutte : Permanente luchtvervuiling en 10 miljoen chronisch zieken komen nooit ter sprake, ten gunste van decennialang zogenaamd gezond financieel beleid. Pollutionwatch : Toenemend bewijs toont risico's aan dat hart, longen, bloeddruk en groei van foetussen worden aangetast door ultrafijnstof van vliegtuigen en wegverkeer. Europees Agentschap : Van 1000e

Signed Virus = NON-contagious nanoparticle airpollution

12 May 2026, 13:48 UTC258 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Waarom hebben jonge vrouwen massaal een burn-out ? Ultrafijnstof veroorzaakt wereldwijd bijna 2 miljoen voortijdige sterfgevallen per jaar. https://www.mpg.de/26869767/ultrafine-particles-cause-two-million-premature-deaths-worldwide-a-year https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=2090686301871254 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lt5sciiZK5k

Signed Virus = NON-contagious nanoparticle airpollution

29 Mar 2026, 03:39 UTC501 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed Virus = NON-contagious nanoparticle airpollution

6 Jan 2026, 21:06 UTC629 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

Woon je in de buurt van Schiphol of onder een opstijgroute en wil je voorkomen dat je chronisch ziek wordt dan is dit een must. Ik ben nog een paar weken in Nederland en heb er nog 3 voor ernstig zieken.

Signed Virus = NON-contagious nanoparticle airpollution

3 Aug 2025, 23:00 UTC≈5,680 viewsread 6 August 2026

UK net-zero emissions test case for climate intervention by cloud seeding with metal powder additives in jet fuel to reduce sunlight : Research on global warming mitigation and decarbonisation piloted by Imperial College aerospace engineers includes cirrus control, marine sky brightening and global stratospheric aerosol injection. Parliamentary debate over geoengineering e-petition on 23-6-2025. British experts warn

Signed Dirk Elsthout 🇳🇱 NL (This account is banned 🤬 from public chats since 2023, presumably by corporatist cyber intrusion)

6 Jul 2025, 15:18 UTC431 viewsread 6 August 2026

Als een nano-deeltje van luchtvervuiling ons lichaam binnendringt, dan zet ons lichaam er een proteïne-laag omheen. Dit is om te voorkomen dat het nano-deeltjes schade aanricht. Hier laat Tom Cowan zien dat bij wat ze virus-isolatie noemen, ze een stukje weefsel of snot afnemen en daar een o.a. een chemicalie met de naam Trypsin bijvoegen. Het effect daarvan is dat de proteïne-laag verandert in spikes, wat er dan ond

Signed Virus = NON-contagious nanoparticle airpollution

5 Jul 2025, 22:25 UTC≈3,020 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

Als dit nog niet duidelijk genoeg is? Virussen zijn bedacht om de natuur de schuld te geven van de industriele giffen, waarvan benzine uitstoot de allergrootste is, omdat iedereen ter wereld daar aan bloot staat en om iedereen daarna te kunnen injecteren met een injectable operating systeem.

Signed Virus = NON-contagious nanoparticle airpollution

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @smogrefugees. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 923,788 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Air pollution refugees, Stop 5G, geoengineering, cruelties & chronic diseases epidemics” (@smogrefugees), 504 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smogrefugees.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.