Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for сметана. - конструктор учёта финансов

Channel

сметана. - конструктор учёта финансов

@smetapp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

48subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003851128797
TypeChannel
Username@smetapp
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 21 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/smetapp

Growth

487 August 2026 — 48 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47–49 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 13:1648no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:1848first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 21 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
30
Links
22

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2475.0%
👍39.38%
🤔26.25%
13.13%
😱13.13%
🤩13.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC143 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Нужна ли кнопка "Назад" на внутренних страницах разделов?

  1. Только на вебе (на мобилках я свайпаю)11%
  2. Только на мобилках (на вебе есть браузер)7%
  3. Оставьте везде (мне нужна явная кнопка)78%
  4. Уберите отовсюду (пользуюсь системным "назад" и свайпом)4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC646 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Впервые показываем, как будет выглядеть журнал операций в «сметане». Пока вы рассматриваете макеты (это то самое ядро учёта, ради которого всё затевалось), помогите нам разрешить внутренний спор. Речь про кнопку «Назад» (<) для возврата на главную страницу раздела. Часть команды считает, что явная кнопка нужна везде, иначе пользователи потеряются в интерфейсе. Другая часть уверена: на вебе она тупо дублирует стрелк

🔥3🤩1

23 Jun 2026, 17:47 UTC122 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Неделя 14. Проекты, модальные окна и ревью. — Аналитика: Постановка задач для фронтов по созданию проекта, описание возможных мест размещения кликабельных ссылок — Политика конфиденциальности и Контакты. Запилили ручки для лимитов, добавили apply_operation, прошлись по описаниям, устранили мелкие косяки. — Бэкенд: Правят замечания по конфигурационному файлу. Готовятся к работе над маршрутами модулей. — Фронтенд: Р

🔥4

15 Jun 2026, 18:08 UTC109 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Недели 12 и 13. Двойной отчёт. На прошлой неделе мы просто забыли выпустить отчёт. Разработка набрала такой темп, что понедельник пролетел мимо. Исправляемся. Выжимка за две спринт-недели сразу: — Бэкенд: поменяли логику удаления проектов. Теперь это не жесткое удаление, а soft delete (is_archived). Добили шаблонизатор для писем и переписали логику бюджетов. — Фронтенд: стартовали создание страницы «Мои проекты».

🔥2

2 Jun 2026, 06:48 UTC101 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Неделя 11. User Flow, проекты и категории — Аналитика: доделан User Flow для архива — доступен в докмосте. В работе User Flow для Лимитов (Бюджетов), описана обратная связь. Классические будни аналитика: сегодня доделываю, если не успею — завтра. — Бэкенд: добавлены ручки создания и получения макетов проектов. Пока без правовых ограничений — чтобы можно было потестить сами проекты. Донастроен Sentry для логирования

25 May 2026, 16:10 UTC111 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Неделя 10. Логгер, архивация и авторизация. — Бэкенд: Работают над бизнес-логикой Категорий — определяют уровни вложенности. Разбирались с логгером — вроде заработал, осталось настроить. — Аналитика: Описали логику по архивации проектов. Предварительно описали логику по бюджету (лимитам). Доделали sequence-диаграммы и перенесли в Docmost. Есть нюанс с атрибутом is_archived — обсудят во вторник. — Тестировщики: Доп

👍1

18 May 2026, 13:56 UTC142 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Неделя 9. Логи, категории и схемы. — Бэкенд: Начали переводить логи с системного логера в отдельный сервис — GlichTip. Доделали логику Бюджета, но, как водится в стартапах, уже думаем, как переделать. В модуле категорий доделали поиск родителей в репозитории, разделили сохранение на индивидуальное и групповое, добавили дефолтные категории «Доходы» и «Расходы». Ещё ждали внятной логики работы бэка. Не дождались. Кла

🔥3

13 May 2026, 07:20 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «сметана. - конструктор учёта финансов»

13 May 2026, 07:19 UTC871 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Глас народа — закон. 67% проголосовало за «Сметану». В комментариях всё справедливо разложили по полочкам: прямая транслитерация («СметАпп») выглядит коряво, а варианты типа «Смета Плюс» годятся только для 1С-франчайзи из нулевых. Нам нужен был простой, запоминающийся и нескучный бренд для соло-пользователей и небольших команд. Серьёзного корпоративного финтеха с синими логотипами на рынке и так с избытком. В маке

🔥2🤔2😱1

12 May 2026, 06:45 UTC790 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Ребрендинг?

  1. Огонь, берём «Сметана» (нестандартно и легко запомнить)66%
  2. Смиритесь и пишите «СметАпп» (я за классику)18%
  3. Ищите другой вариант (оба мимо)11%
  4. Оставлю вариант в комментариях!4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 May 2026, 06:45 UTC813 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, SmetApp придётся переименовать. Нам очень нравится это название, да и домен smetapp.ru уже наш. Но есть проблема — закон о рекламе. Продвигать англицизмы в РФ без зарегистрированного товарного знака нельзя. А до знака нам ещё далеко. Мы покрутили варианты перевода. Писать кириллицей «СметАпп» или «СметАп» — откровенно некрасиво и тяжеловесно. «Смета Плюс» — банально, занято и пахнет бухгалтерией из нулевы

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @smetapp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTCAnonymous Poll27 voters

Нужна ли кнопка "Назад" на внутренних страницах разделов?

  1. Только на вебе (на мобилках я свайпаю)11%
  2. Только на мобилках (на вебе есть браузер)7%
  3. Оставьте везде (мне нужна явная кнопка)78%
  4. Уберите отовсюду (пользуюсь системным "назад" и свайпом)4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 May 2026, 06:45 UTCAnonymous Poll89 voters

Ребрендинг?

  1. Огонь, берём «Сметана» (нестандартно и легко запомнить)66%
  2. Смиритесь и пишите «СметАпп» (я за классику)18%
  3. Ищите другой вариант (оба мимо)11%
  4. Оставлю вариант в комментариях!4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 16 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,291,074 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“сметана. - конструктор учёта финансов” (@smetapp), 48 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smetapp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.