Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SMEKALKA.de

@smekalkade

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

321subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002076517981
TypeChannel
Username@smekalkade
DescriptionFreie Übersetzungen aus dem Russischen, kostenlos lesen! Seite checken: https://smekalka.de Für Kanal voten: https://t.me/boost/smekalkade
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/smekalkade

Growth

3216 Aug 2026, 10:45 — 321 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:00 — 321 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 10:456 Aug 2026, 22:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 320–322 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 22:00321no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:45321first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.5%
avg views ÷ 321 subscribers
Avg views / post
185
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 April 20262 August 2026)
Views total554
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
157
Videos
6
Links
83

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7280.0%
🤩1415.6%
🔥22.22%
👀11.11%
💯11.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC115 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🆕 WAFFEN DES GENOZIDS | KAPITEL 4.8. 🎤Näheres über Ethanol 📖Lesezeit: ca. 8 Minuten 🤩 Wusstest du, dass Alkohol für unseren Körper sogar lebensnotwendig ist? Aber nicht der aus der Flasche. Unser Körper stellt genau die Menge Alkohol selbst her, die er braucht. 🧩 Was passiert also, wenn wir unserem Körper über das benötigte Maß hinaus Alkohol von außen zuführen? Warum kann eine Substanz, die der Körper selbst pr

👍5

26 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC190 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🆕 SIND TATTOOS KUNST? 📖 Lesezeit: ca. 4 Minuten Kürzlich nannte ein Videotitel jene Menschen „besonders“, die keinerlei Tattoos am Körper tragen. Und da stellte sich mir eine Frage: Sollte eine saubere, untätowierte Haut nicht eher normal sein? Und sollte nicht demnach jemand mit tätowierter Haut der „Sonderling“ sein? Vermutlich hat dieser Tattoo-Trend auch etwas mit dem Streben nach vermeintlicher Individualität

👍3

19 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC249 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🆕WAFFEN DES GENOZIDS | KAPITEL 4.7. 🎤Gibt es eine sichere Dosis? 📖Lesezeit: ca. 17 Minuten In diesem Kapitel geht es um die wissenschaftliche Erläuterung der Frage, ob es eine Alkoholmenge X gibt, die für den Menschen als unbedenklich gelten könnte. Immerhin stellt unser Körper ja selbst Alkohol her. Auch geht es darum, dass auch süßes Obst geringe Mengen Alkohol enthält (bzw. der enthaltene Zucker im Körper zu Al

👍6

1 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC322 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ihr Lieben, hier wird es in nächster Zeit etwas ruhiger. 😊 Die Reihe über die Waffen des Genozids werde ich natürlich fortsetzen – nur eben in dem Tempo, das meine neue Lebenssituation zulässt. Vorerst liegt mein Fokus auf diesen kleinen Füßen hier. 🥰 Danke für euer Verständnis und dafür, dass ihr trotzdem hier seid. Mareike 📌 www.smekalka.de | 😀 t.me/smekalkade

🤩14👍6

29 Jun 2026, 05:58 UTC437 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🆕 WAFFEN DES GENOZIDS | KAPITEL 4.6. 🎤 Wissenswertes über die Funktionsweise unseres Gehirns 📖 Lesezeit: ca. 11 Minuten Wie auch in der Welt, gibt es auch in unserem Körper nichts, was sich dem Prinzip „auf Aktion folgt Reaktion“ entziehen könnte. Daher wirkt sich der Konsum von Alkohol und anderen Drogen nicht nur auf unsere allgemeine körperliche Gesundheit und Leistungsfähigkeit aus, sondern auch auf unsere Psyc

👍4👀1

22 Jun 2026, 09:22 UTC≈1,990 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Was bestimmt unser Denken, unsere Entscheidungen und letztlich unser Leben? „Eine Frage der Weltanschauung, Band 1“ versammelt 32 philosophische Kurzgeschichten und Essays über Bewusstsein, Selbstverantwortung, gesellschaftliche Entwicklung und die Art, wie Menschen die Welt wahrnehmen. AB SOFORT ERHÄLTLICH! Ein Buch für alle, die gewohnte Denkweisen hinterfragen und neue Perspektiven entdecken möchten. BONUSKA

👍1🔥1

21 Jun 2026, 08:04 UTC263 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Hallo zusammen! Diesen Sonntag muss das nächste Kapitel zu den "Waffen des Genozids" leider ausfallen. Als Entschädigung gibt es morgen am 22.6.2026 um 11:22 Uhr eine tolle Ankündigung. Lasst euch überraschen! Seid herzlich gegrüßt! Mareike 📌 www.smekalka.de | 😀 t.me/smekalkade

👍3

14 Jun 2026, 08:01 UTC348 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🆕 WAFFEN DES GENOZIDS | KAPITEL 4.5. 🎤 Wissenswertes über unseren Organismus 📖 Lesezeit: ca. 13 Minuten Im Leben braucht es immer ein Gleichgewicht – das betrifft die Pflanzenwelt und das Tierreich gleichermaßen wie den Menschen an sich. Ist der Mensch nicht im Gleichgewicht, wird er psychisch oder körperlich krank. Und wer künstlich selbst dafür sorgt, dass durch den Konsum von Drogen das empfindliche Gleichgewich

👍3💯1

7 Jun 2026, 08:04 UTC325 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🆕 WAFFEN DES GENOZIDS | KAPITEL 4.4. 🎤 Der Mechanismus der Zellzerstörung durch Alkohol 📖 Lesezeit: ca. 4 Minuten Alkohol trinken ist eine körper-politische Entscheidung: Du öffnest die Grenzen zu deinen schützenswertesten Zellen und zu deiner DNA, sodass alles Mögliche ungebremst durchmarschieren und in deinem Körper Schaden anrichten kann. 🚩 LIES ES NOCHMAL GENAUER NACH IM NEUESTEN KAPITEL VON „WAFFEN DES GENOZI

👍3

31 May 2026, 08:02 UTC≈8,070 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🆕 WAFFEN DES GENOZIDS | KAPITEL 4.3. 🎤 Hypoxie – die alkoholische Euphorie 📖 Lesezeit: ca. 4 Minuten ☁️ Ein Heißluftballon. 👨🏻 3 Besatzungsmitglieder. 🤩 Ein luftiger Höhenflug voller Euphorie. ☠ 2 Tote. ❌ Kein Alkohol im Spiel. Was ist passiert? Und was hat das schließlich doch mit Alkohol zu tun? 🚩 LIES ES NACH IM NEUESTEN KAPITEL VON „WAFFEN DES GENOZIDS“. 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ✈️ BEITRAG LESEN ✈️ ZUR KAPITELÜBERSI

👍6

24 May 2026, 08:04 UTC385 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🆕 WAFFEN DES GENOZIDS | KAPITEL 4.2. 🎤 Wie Alkohol den Verstand benebelt 📖 Lesezeit: ca. 4 Minuten 🤷‍♀️ Wieso fangen manche Menschen unter Alkoholeinfluss an zu taumeln, andere verlieren ihre guten Manieren und wieder andere können sich am nächsten Morgen an nichts mehr erinnern? 🤩Eines sei gesagt: Es liegt nicht an der konsumierten Menge an Alkohol! Wohl aber an der Art der verlorenen Nervenzellen. Merke: 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍

👍3

17 May 2026, 08:01 UTC≈3,020 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🆕 WAFFEN DES GENOZIDS | KAPITEL 4.1. 🎤 Der Wirkmechanismus von Alkohol 📖 Lesezeit: ca. 12 Minuten Wie man sich fühlt, wenn man Alkohol getrunken hat, dürfte den meisten Menschen bekannt sein. Doch weniger bekannt ist, was hinter dieser euphorischen und enthemmten Leichtigkeit steht. 😦 Wieso fühlt man sich leicht und fröhlich, wenn man getrunken hat? 😦Warum haben viele Trinker ein rotes Gesicht? 😦Warum nennt man d

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @smekalkade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 551,865 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SMEKALKA.de” (@smekalkade), 321 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smekalkade.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.