2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 197–199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 04:32
198
no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:07
198
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
165
Videos
3
Links
147
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
29 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
21
72.4%
👏
4
13.8%
❤
2
6.90%
👍
1
3.45%
😱
1
3.45%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2022 to 29 March 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
bought this based from elon tweet. shilled by friends. 0 tax lp burnt. cant check much info with the team
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/989198118666162176
https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0xa0d277Aa60f29f0613676Dc5C1910cbfD6A2e1d8
Signed L | On Vacation | 40 eth to daytona 116508G
13k another moonbet based from elon tweet. not locked nor renounced so be careful
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xff0ee93e93ced5812a64f3fdbbc5f619d4d171d3
HOLY F
Im rich asf xD
They launched on Eth net and hit 2M mcap (sorry to not calling it but I aped at around 15k mcap so I hope u get urs too). Now BSC RISU getting all the attention of whales soon to be multi M. Congrats to all those holders!
BSC: 1M MCAP
https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x8163100460d2186de4e700c479d5e87283426d27
ETH: 1.7M MCAP
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x310094285801173d92168…
PEPE/WETH
200K ath this is really a banger
Sitting now at 108k MCAP, Im thinking to add some bags xD
https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x0dd5b33bbcbab5ff92b442f83a0e007a0a583e12
As always, DYOR and TAYOR everyone! AIM FOR THE MOON
PEPE/WETH
GOD OF MEMES, team relaunched due to ca massive sell and well they fixed it. Ill still trust the team.
0x4c57dFF92DB3cBB7071E8159960A3b2c488d33C7
Current MCAP: 18K
🐸 medium.com/@PepeFrog
🐸 t.me/godofmemeserc
https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x4c57dFF92DB3cBB7071E8159960A3b2c488d33C7
As always, DYOR and TAYOR everyone! AND AIM FOR THE MOON
PEPE/WETH
GOD OF MEMES, been monitoring this thing and I think this is the one XD good snipe tho
0x746007261627fce35137918ed4cb8331a8f924a1
Current MCAP: 18K
🐸 medium.com/@PepeFrog
🐸 t.me/godofmemeserc
https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x746007261627fce35137918ed4cb8331a8f924a1
As always, DYOR and TAYOR everyone! AND AIM FOR THE MOON
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @smcallscrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@smcallscrypto named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@xenshib named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SM Calls | MultiChain & Perpetual Calls” (@smcallscrypto), 198 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smcallscrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.