Channel
@smartincomegroup
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
602subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001151559317 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @smartincomegroup |
| Created | Between 1 December 2018 and 31 August 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/smartincomegroup |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 602 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 603 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 606 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 607 | no change |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 607 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
31 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 41.9% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 22.6% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 19.4% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 16.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2025 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I had been on this trade for about 6-12 days now. Doing real estate deals, made me switch to swing trading strategy… I must confess it’s one of the best decisions around crypto trading I have made. …and yes, it requires lot of patience.
You won't believe how this update is making people lots of money in a single day, in this letter I’ll reveal everything ✅ Step-by-step guide ✅ Proof of earnings ✅ How you can start today Don’t wait—this opportunity won’t last forever! Watch NOW and change your financial future! https://LuxanoGroup.com/realtors
🔥1
https://youtu.be/QDur5Vk-Hqs?si=0dGaMrt61YnHOuiE
Again $640M+ Liquidated 😳
There are ways to battle losing it all when the market seems to be leaving people Rekt.
JUST IN: $135,000,000 liquidated from the crypto market in the past 30 minutes.
👍1
Which Birthday Gift would you Want?
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
+1 It's been God.
This guy turned a gas station into a $275 million machine. No fancy tech. No Wall Street backing. Just clean bathrooms, fresh brisket, and a cast-iron understanding of what travelers actually want. His name? Beaver. (Yes, really.) Back in 1982, he’s working for his dad’s construction company in Texas… but itching to build something of his own. On his daily drive to work, he notices something: Every gas station…
❤12👍6🎉5🔥5
Photo, posted without a caption
I've had loads of questions flooding my emails and inbox. Some of them are questions that being part of our APEX CLUB answers.... Few others may require me to do some videos on. Below are some of the 3 repeated questions I do get and their answers. Q: Do you believe that in the next bear market, we’ll see BTC drop below $100,000 again? A: Absolutely. No matter how high it flies, I fully expect Bitcoin to revi…
Fun Fact: If you would have invested $10 into #Bitcoin every day since 2015… You would’ve turned $36,500 into $13,500,000. Yes. THIRTEEN POINT FIVE MILLION DOLLARS. 🤯 That’s a +36,000% gain 🚀
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @smartincomegroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which Birthday Gift would you Want?
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2025 to 13 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“APEX CAPITAL W/ GEORGE” (@smartincomegroup), 602 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smartincomegroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.