🧠 @gangtsar — score 80/100 ⚡ 20× below its class valuation 🏷 Buy for 30 GRAM · Fragment 🔒 Deal on Fragment — the name transfers the moment you pay

Channel
Smarteka · Undervalued Usernames
@smarteka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002075590238 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @dronescan @smarteka @wearlab |
| Description | 💎 Undervalued Telegram usernames from the secondary market — priced below class valuation (validated on 111k+ Fragment sales). 🧠 Score any name: @NameCatcherBot 👉 Deals: @BrandEvangelist #fragment #usernames #nft |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| On Telegram | t.me/smarteka |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 7 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 7 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 7 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:59 | 7 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 38.1%
- avg views ÷ 7 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2.7
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (2 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 56 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 53
- Links
- 50
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
🧠 @beachwar — score 80/100 ⚡ 15× below its class valuation 🏷 Buy for 40 GRAM · Fragment «A literal mash of "beach" and "war" — it reads as sand-and-surf combat, the kind of label that fits a summer volleyball showdown, a water-gun tournament or a mobile game about turf battles on the shore. Two clean syllables, the soft "beach" snapping into the open "war," make it easy to say and hard to misspell; the pairing is a t…
🧠 @easymid — score 81/100 ⚡ 15× below its class valuation 🏷 Buy for 40 GRAM · Fragment 🔒 Deal on Fragment — the name transfers the moment you pay
🧠 @bossevil — score 80/100 🔨 Auction: bid 40 GRAM · Fragment «"Bossevil" fuses two instantly readable English words into a villain-boss persona — the final boss you're supposed to fear — with the inverted word order giving it a pseudo-Latin, brand-like twist rather than plain "evil boss". It sounds punchy and hissing, three easy syllables with a hard B opening and a snake-like S in the middle, which makes it a natura…
🧠 @xrmas — score 83/100 ⚡ 16× below its class valuation 🏷 Buy for 25 GRAM · Fragment «Read as a mashup of "XR" (extended reality) and "mas," it lands on the eye as a garbled "Xmas" — festive echo, but the opening cluster "xr-" has no clean English pronunciation, so most people will spell it rather than say it. That gives it real utility for an AR/VR or holiday-commerce handle thanks to its five-letter compactness and…
🧠 @ceolp — score 83/100 ⚡ 16× below its class valuation 🏷 Buy for 25 GRAM · Fragment «A mash-up of "CEO" and "LP" that reads like shorthand for the boardroom-and-limited-partner world of funds and startups, giving it real pull for a VC, founder-media or dealflow channel; the trouble is the tail — that "-olp" cluster lands as a mumbled "see-olp" and the whole string looks more like a ticker glitch than a word. Strong …
🧠 @rainload — score 80/100 ⚡ 20× below its class valuation 🏷 Buy for 30 GRAM · Fragment «"Rainload" fuses "rain" and "load" into a compound that evokes downpour, saturation, or a heavy delivery of water, though its exact meaning stays vague and metaphorical rather than concrete. It rolls off the tongue smoothly with two clean syllables and a calm, natural cadence, giving it real brand potential for weather, data-tran…
🧠 @whygift — score 81/100 🔨 Auction: bid 30 GRAM · Fragment 🔒 Deal on Fragment — the name transfers the moment you pay
🧠 @axishome — score 80/100 ⚡ 16× below its class valuation 🏷 Buy for 36 GRAM · Fragment «"Axishome" fuses "axis" — a pivot, a central line — with "home," reading naturally as a hub or anchor point for living spaces, an easy fit for furniture, interior design or real estate branding. It rolls off the tongue in three crisp syllables with a bright vowel snap, sounds like a real Western brand rather than a coined mashup,…
🧠 @repudiated — score 85/100 🔨 Auction: bid 40 GRAM · Fragment «A clean dictionary word meaning rejected, disowned or formally refused — a Latinate legal-financial term (repudiated debt, repudiated treaty) that rolls off in four crisp syllables with a rhythmic, almost declamatory bite. The negativity and past-tense verb form make it awkward as a company name, but it's a rare, fully legible English word with obvious a…
🧠 @hardbody — score 80/100 🔨 Auction: bid 34 GRAM · Fragment «"Hardbody" fuses "hard" and "body" into instantly legible slang for a lean, muscled physique — the kind of word that lives in gyms, fitness marketing and 90s action-movie swagger (and, incidentally, on Nissan's old pickup badge). It sounds punchy and percussive, three syllables that hit like reps, and that clarity makes it a genuinely valuable handle for f…
🧠 @thenomen — score 80/100 ⚡ 20× below its class valuation 🏷 Buy for 30 GRAM · Fragment «"Thenomen" fuses the definite article with the Latin "nomen" (name), literally reading as "the name" — a fitting, self-referential label for any branding or identity venture. It rolls off the tongue smoothly with a calm three-syllable cadence, and its subtle Latin flavor lends it a polished, authoritative feel that carries genuin…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @smarteka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,413,775 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@smarteka named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Smarteka · Undervalued Usernames” (@smarteka), 7 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smarteka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.