Channel
@slushycalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
459subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001761960425 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @slushycalls |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/slushycalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 459 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 460 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 460 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 10 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
246 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 103 | 41.9% | |
| 🔥 | 80 | 32.5% | |
| 👍 | 41 | 16.7% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 2.85% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 1.22% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.22% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.22% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 1.22% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.813% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.407% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2024 to 4 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
we're close to a major breakout for the whole market once BTC enters price discovery and for those asking, yes, im still in all my positions for eth and sol if I hold something in my wallets im bullish on it (slushygmi.eth and slushygmi.sol) hang in there, higher prices soon (yes the chop has been brutal lol)
❤31🔥8
JUST IN: $71,000 Bitcoin @WatcherGuru
👍3
yellow boi summer
🔥12🥰2👏1
Sticker, posted without a caption
$JOE pushing aths sitting over 4x entry now once again, observe the strength next 100m+ meme on ETH
🔥10❤3👍2
I don't have a crystal ball but this is what I see for BTC in the midst of the 4th wave of the textbook parabolic trend we've been in since the bear market lows if this trend plays out we'll be hitting ~90k soon before a new larger trend takes shape this leg up we'll see ETH and SOL greatly outperform and memes start to go parabolic
🔥11👍4❤2
ETH just closed the biggest fuck you candle in years and BTC testing aths again...what a day mog, joe, and hpos bros we are absolutely eating on ETH memes stay bullish we're now entering the banana zone
🔥6
study the strength of $JOE https://x.com/0xBold/status/1792648167567032770
❤6
most strong memes that have already retraced 70-90% off highs will reverse soon when alts pump again. if you have conviction simply work for your bags and wait for your coin to get its turn. I see absolutely no reason to chase new pairs and rotate into random stuff now, high conviction only
👍11❤5
$HAROLD the duck $THOMAS the pig $GARY the goat the perfect trifecta of animal memes holding all of them
❤9🔥6
sized up on $HAROLD here leading animal meme with a cult community harold is due for another run soon duck to a buck
❤13👀3
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔥18👀4🍾3🤔3🤨3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @slushycalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Slushy Calls 🍧💹” (@slushycalls), 459 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slushycalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.