Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Слух сюда | Максим Астальцев

Channel

Слух сюда | Максим Астальцев

@sluhsuda

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

319subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001930185748
TypeChannel
Username@sluhsuda
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sluhsuda

Growth

319322320.57 August 2026 — 322 subscribers7 August 2026 — 322 subscribers13 August 2026 — 320 subscribers20 August 2026 — 319 subscribers7 August 202620 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 13 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 319–322 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 03:52319-1
13 Aug 2026, 17:54320-2
7 Aug 2026, 03:16322no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:04322first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.6%
avg views ÷ 319 subscribers
Avg views / post
126
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 May 20264 August 2026)
Views total379
Reactions total38
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

269 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10237.9%
🔥7929.4%
3412.6%
custom 5188481666510756655269.67%
custom 5188263134279770117217.81%
custom 583268494081419233351.86%
custom 523567219447379481710.372%
custom 603505425638438021110.372%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sluhsuda. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC84 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У здорового человека нет проблем с волевой регуляцией. Т.е. решит делать – сделает. Это отличный фильтр на зависимости. Т.е, если ты добухался до панкреатита (отсылочка), то, узнав неприятные новости, бросить пить не составит труда. А вот человек с зависимостью так не сможет. Придумает миллион обходов, чтобы пить. Отсюда большое непонимание между аддиктами и обычными людьми. Первые не понимают, как так легко можн

🔥5custom 5188481666510756655432

30 Jul 2026, 12:23 UTC141 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я в терапии 3-5-10 лет Значит не работает? Зависит от целей Если ты дошел до психиатра(ов) и у тебя диагноз расстройства личности – то терапия пожизненная. Это как ходить в зал после серьезной травмы – как только перестанешь, сразу начнет болеть. Если ты большой фанат психоанализа, то он по любым запросам длится 4+ лет минимум. Вот с легким неврозом ходить 5 лет - правда вызывает вопросы. Кроч, терапия – дело н

6🔥31

27 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC154 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Он имеет право злиться» Никогда не выкупал такие выражения. Т.е можно НЕ иметь право на эмоции? Сразу представляется полиция эмоций, которая будет выписывать штрафы за нарушения. Кароч абсурд полный. Я вот буду сидеть дома и злиться до усрачки, и вы мне ничего за это не сделаете лололо. Не поддавайся на такие манипуляции, дружочек.

5🔥5custom 51884816665107566553custom 51882631342797701171

23 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC184 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Постики в телеге, рилсики и книжки по самопомощи НЕ помогают. То есть помогают, но либо развлекаловом, либо людям изначально здоровым и устойчивым. Если мы имеем здоровую психику, которой не хватает информации – то да. Прочитал, про себя кивнул, пошел делать/менять. Это процентов 10 от людей, которые обращаются ко мне. Остальным 90 – хоть обмажься этой инфой. Все равно упрется в отрицание, вытеснение и старое доб

4🔥42

17 Jul 2026, 14:54 UTC187 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Клиника Абсолютно культовое дерьмо, один из лучших комедийных сериалов всех времен. Смотрел раз 7. Главные герои гига токсики. Джей Ди и Элиот – учебник про чуть ли не все дефекты психики. Оба на грани расстройства личности. Манипуляции, эмоциональная инфантильность, примитивные защиты, покинутость и далее по списку. Им бы нахер уволится из больницы, устроится в другую и потом на терапию года на 2-3. Но нет, муч

8custom 518826313427977011765custom 60350542563843802111

14 Jul 2026, 11:44 UTC205 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Содержание пикчи - неироинчный медицинский совет в Канаде. Кто не шарит, в Канаде есть программа по эвтаназии - MAID. Давно про нее слышал, недавно наткнулся на разбор. Там какой-то лютый пиздец. Программа сделана для терминально больных, страдающих людей, правда? Нет. на нее может податься кто угодно. Почему я об этом тут пишу? Одним из многих оснований для эвтаназии является депрессия. Депрессия, Карл. Все это

custom 583268494081419233354🔥4custom 51884816665107566552

9 Jul 2026, 16:40 UTC216 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

За дефективность Часто челы говорят - "Че мне себя обманывать, что я молодец? Это ж неправда" Суть устойчивой самооценки не в том, что ты думаешь, что ты - заебись (хотя это часто подразумевается). А в том, что есть стойкая уверенность, что ты не хуже других. Поэтому когда люди на встрече начинают говорить, про сверхдостижения - это сразу лампочка, что внутри есть ощущение, что чел как раз таки ХУЖЕ других. И нужн

🔥107

28 Jun 2026, 15:50 UTC220 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Такие дела

custom 518848166651075665510🔥1custom 52356721944737948171

24 Jun 2026, 11:58 UTC271 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

От человека который семь лет ждал, чтобы сделать предложение - все правда

custom 518848166651075665575

23 Jun 2026, 17:06 UTC253 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Читаю интернеты последнее время - у людей едет крыша из-за бензина. Реально вспоминаются бабки лет 15 назад, которые ломанулись покупать гречку, потому что их на собрании бабок убедили, что скоро все кончится. В итоге эти жертвы псиопов реально пошли и своим сверхспросом создали временный кризис. Тлдр - не читайте интернет, если с тревогой такая проблема. Вас наебывают.

8🔥6custom 51882631342797701173

18 Jun 2026, 12:54 UTC279 views9 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как обычно -точно сказать сложно, но думаю следующее: Это либо избегание (очково заглянуть внутрь себя/довериться человеку), либо ложная мотивация. Второе это как пойду в зал в понедельник. Вообще не хочу, но как бы надо. Зачем надо не понятно. Я вот знаю, что бегать по утрам полезно, но никогда в жизни не буду это делать. Тут главное смириться с последствиями отсутствия терапии/бега по утрам.

32🔥2custom 51882631342797701172

17 Jun 2026, 08:07 UTC201 views8 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот это интересно Ответ - я не знаю. Ни в своей практике, ни у коллег такого никогда не слышал. Поэтому дальше догадки. Ты какое-то значение придаешь имени. Уважение/близость/принятие. Что-то. И избегаешь не самого имени, а именно вот этого значения. Тип на человека обижен, напрямую сказать не могу, но могу его по имени не назвать. А если назову по имени значил простил/признал/доверился или ещё что-то. А я не хочу

🔥53

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sluhsuda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 561,505 of 1,584,486entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Слух сюда | Максим Астальцев” (@sluhsuda), 319 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sluhsuda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.