Channel
@slovnikovadruzina
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
228subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001430318941 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @slovnikovadruzina |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/slovnikovadruzina |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 228 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 229 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 231 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 230 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 230 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 22 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
180 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 103 | 57.2% | |
| ❤ | 42 | 23.3% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 8.89% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 3.89% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 2.22% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.11% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 1.11% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.11% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.556% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.556% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2023 to 13 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🆕 НОВА АНКЕТА Послє ваших одговоров на стару анкету, мы имајемо и једно ново пытање. 😱 Мы јесмо рапортовали, же форму погледати људи највыше често избирајут како совршены/досконалы глагол, але то имаје проблемы: • 🇨🇿🇸🇰 В чешском и словачском то јест фалшивы пријатељ🕵️. • 🇺🇦 В украјинском то је несовршены/недосконалы глагол за повтарјано дєјство. 👀 🙏 Просимо вас учествовати в новој анкетє, да быхмо смогли сдєла…
❤17👍4
🆕 NOVA ANKETA Poslě vaših odgovorov na staru anketu, my imajemo i jedno novo pytanje. 😱 My jesmo raportovali, že formu pogledati ljudi najvyše često izbirajut kako sovršeny/doskonaly glagol, ale to imaje problemy: • 🇨🇿🇸🇰 V češskom i slovačskom to jest falšivy prijatelj🕵️. • 🇺🇦 V ukrajinskom to je nesovršeny/nedoskonaly glagol za povtarjano dějstvo. 👀 🙏 Prosimo vas učestvovati v novoj anketě, da byhmo smogli sd…
🔥4👍2
📊 АНКЕТА О СЛОВАХ С КОРЕЊЕМ "-ГЛЕД-" 🔍 Драги помочники развоја меджусловјанского језыка, тутдењ мы рапортујемо, же анкета јест скончена и можемо огласити јеј резултаты: 🎯 Оптималне варианты в особливых ситуацијах • погледнути — за моментално, једнократно гледање, напр.: “шоферка кратко погледнула в бочно зрцало” • погледывати — за периодично повтарјано гледање, напр.: “он је непокојил се и често погледывал на ча…
👍8
📊 ANKETA O SLOVAH S KORENJEM "-GLED-" 🔍 Dragi pomočniki razvoja medžuslovjanskogo jezyka, tutdenj my raportujemo, že anketa jest skončena i možemo oglasiti jej rezultaty: 🎯 Optimalne varianty v osoblivyh situacijah • poglednuti — za momentalno, jednokratno gledanje, napr.: “šoferka kratko poglednula v bočno zrcalo” • pogledyvati — za periodično povtarjano gledanje, napr.: “on je nepokojil se i često pogledyval n…
👍5
↑↑↑ 📊 Rezultaty ankety možno viděti tu: 📊 Резултаты анкеты можно видєти ту: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MpCC3dsmxePTYEMZROD5WIuAmXYttA55siDLR77tJeo/edit
👍5🤔1
😊️️️️️️ Nova anketa / Нова анкета Prosimo vaše aktivno učestje: Просимо ваше активно учестје: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdLBkP4bDRunrUQFOoSt5eL9irgbUG3Duxuic_h_6fK9ivuMQ/viewform?usp=sf_link
👌3👍2🔥2👏1
Kake slova v medžuslovjanskom sut najlěpše za "this" i "that"? To, tuto, ovo, se, ili něčto drugo? My jesmo zapytali o tom 57 nositeljev raznyh slovjanskyh jezykov i stvorili analizu, rezultaty ktoroj my nakonec možemo publikovati. Каке слова в меджусловјанском сут најлєпше за "this" и "that"? То, туто, ово, се, или нєчто друго? Мы јесмо запытали о том 57 носитељев разных словјанскых језыков и створили анализу, резу…
👍21🤨1
V medžuslovjanskom jezyku veliku važnost imajut testy razumlivosti slov bez vsakogo učenja, i nedavno Slovnikova Družina odkryla tri nove rěči, ktore vsaky slovjanin može razuměti směsta. Prověrite sebe! В меджусловјанском језыку велику важност имајут тесты разумливости слов без всакого ученја, и недавно Словникова Дружина одкрыла три нове рєчи, кторе всакы словјанин може разумєти смєста. Провєрите себе!
👍12😁7😐2❤1
Nove popravjenja do slovnikovogo algoritma drěti, mrěti, prěti, trěti, prostrěti, žrěti https://github.com/medzuslovjansky/js-utils/pull/28
❤15
Hvala aktivnym učestnikam - grěšny link je byl popravjeny. 💚 Dobro došli do novoj ankety!
❤7👍4
Nova anketa o demonstracijnyh zaimennikah kako “To je morje, tamto je solnce, tuto je zemja” abo “This is …, that is …”. Prosimo aktivno učestje: https://forms.gle/3MRx9PgD8tVsZKsj8 Rezultaty ankety možno viděti tu: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EiOI7NZDhzqxU6Jp-UGNgrg-igdN1CYLudf0EqGF3RM/edit Motivacija: Tutdenj Medžuslovjansky Slovnik imaje jedino: toj, tutoj, tamtoj, sej, ov, i to škodi procesu poi…
👍10
Velmi prosta anketa o velmi spornom slovu. Prosim učestvovati https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScqXM2dHwkJcAO_6x6h9z4quYs8PYSWX97qIi7aK43_ydseYg/viewform Rezultaty ankety možete viděti tut: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jpEFXCgKexkb-nlO6LQUJjxR1srwlQMQiSAc1Wo2Rgc/edit?usp=sharing
👍14🔥2👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @slovnikovadruzina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Medžuslovjanska Slovnikova Družina - Věsti” (@slovnikovadruzina), 228 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slovnikovadruzina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.