Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Sloof drowse

@sloofdrowse

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

241subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001736946504
TypeChannel
Username@sloofdrowse
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sloofdrowse

Growth

240241240.56 Aug 2026, 13:06 — 240 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:32 — 240 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:21 — 241 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 13:067 Aug 2026, 03:21
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 240–241 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 03:21241+1
7 Aug 2026, 02:32240no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:06240first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 3 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

301 reactions across 9 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥9130.2%
6120.3%
🏆5016.6%
🔥3411.3%
👍154.98%
🌚82.66%
🆒72.33%
👏61.99%
💔61.99%
🕊61.99%
🐳41.33%
🤩41.33%
🦄30.997%
20.664%
💯20.664%
👾10.332%
🤝10.332%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 301reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 September 2025 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jun 2026, 19:03 UTC532 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥20🔥9👏6

4 May 2026, 13:32 UTC543 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Давайте вот так теперь. Всё же в телеге будто бы фото смотреть удобнее, чем гифы.

❤‍🔥25🏆15👍63🔥3🤝1

3 May 2026, 14:23 UTC273 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Вот так пока. Потом по-другому как-нибудь, но пока так.

24🌚7❤‍🔥6👍4

3 Feb 2026, 13:08 UTC386 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kioskvintagePhoto

В эту субботу 7 февраля отмечаем один год магазину на Московской 67! 🎈 В программе: • Праздничный мерч на футболках с иллюстрациями Слуфа. • Скидка 25% на всё и рейл с футболками по 700₽! • Колесо фортуны, где почти каждый покупатель сможет испытать удачу и получить приз! • Разные напитки. Музыка: montydahotdawg x шибаё, Silver, Дмитрий Рудько Старт в 16:00

11❤‍🔥5🏆42🔥2🌚1👍1👾1

1 Dec 2025, 10:25 UTC411 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @space10203Video

6.12 19:00

🏆9❤‍🔥5🔥31

1 Dec 2025, 10:25 UTC344 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Немного участвую. 6 декабря. 19:00. Санкт-Петербург, Кожевенная 34ж, пространство 10.203

7

7 Sept 2025, 22:26 UTC835 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Многие художники могут похвастаться тем, в каких знаковых изданиях они публиковались, я же гордо собираю список книг об уличном искусстве, в которые я по разным причинам не попал, хотя и звали. Причина во всех случаях почти одна и та же, думал, что пока не готов, нужно еще допилить стиль, потом будет стыдно за то, что отправил хрень. Очень хорошо помню, что намеренно слился с «Энциклопедии уличного искусства» от Артм

❤‍🔥2514💔6👍3💯2

3 Sept 2025, 18:59 UTC446 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Видео скворечнич

🔥17🏆6🤩4❤‍🔥2🆒2👍1

3 Sept 2025, 18:55 UTC401 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Скворечнич, как напоминание о конце лета. И ,эксклюзивно для подписчиков из телеграм, его обратная сторона. Если знаете знаете хорошие места в Ростове (или не в Ростове), где ему будет хорошо висеться, прошу в комментарии.

🏆16🕊6🆒5🐳4❤‍🔥3🦄31

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @sloofdrowse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 622,478 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sloof drowse” (@sloofdrowse), 241 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sloofdrowse.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.