Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Заметки Слонсера

@slonser_notes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

3,021subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001598412388
TypeChannel
Username@slonser_notes
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/slonser_notes

Growth

3,0213,0263,023.56 August 2026 — 3,026 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,026 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,022 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,021 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,020–3,027 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:173,021-1
9 Aug 2026, 12:413,022-4
6 Aug 2026, 22:213,026no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:213,026first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19m 27s
Average length
19m 27s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,049 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
34532.9%
😁18817.9%
🔥18317.4%
👍16916.1%
❤‍🔥625.91%
🍾212.00%
🐳201.91%
🤯201.91%
💅161.53%
😐70.667%
🤮50.477%
😈40.381%
😭30.286%
🥰30.286%
👎10.095%
🤬10.095%
🥴10.095%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,049reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
103
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 19 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @slonser_notes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 September 2025 to 4 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC≈5,290 views90 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то гугл запатчили багу которую мы сдавали ещё в ноябре прошлого года Наверное самая креативная бага из тех, что я сдавал В целом описание "Side-channel information leakage" и то что они не могли написать патч несколько месяцев и так отчасти это показывает И да этот баг - часть одного большого ресерча, который надеюсь выйдет осенью, ожидаем)

❤‍🔥62👍18🔥8🍾2

Signed Slonser

26 May 2026, 13:34 UTC≈3,480 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Во время конфаба записали подкастик Наверное откровений там не найдете, но послушать пока ваши агенты ищут баги - можно https://t.me/vk_security/382

14🔥5🤮3😁3🤯2

Signed Slonser

19 Mar 2026, 09:00 UTC≈4,380 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хороший пост про ИИ от Петра Уварова (известный вам по ББ ВК, да он завел канал в MAX Telegram) https://t.me/another_side_bb/4

😁20👍4🔥21🥴1

Signed Slonser

4 Mar 2026, 20:58 UTC≈4,600 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Приходите послушать меня -_+

19🔥8👍3👎1

Signed Slonser

4 Mar 2026, 20:54 UTC≈3,380 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vk_securityPhoto

VK Security Confab для: Bug Bounty edition — уже 19 марта 🔥 Соберёмся офлайн, чтобы обсудить: как ИИ меняет поиск багов, зачем нужны агрегаторы багбаунти и где искать миллионы в цифровых продуктах. В программе: 🔹Пётр Уваров, VK: про LLM в багхантинге и триаже, а также к чему всё может прийти. 🔹Заурбаев Заур, багхантер: как история одного спора привела к созданию платформы-агрегатора баг баунти программ. 🔹Павел Ники

👍11😭32

Signed Slonser

16 Jan 2026, 14:13 UTC≈4,610 views49 reactions12 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Очень люблю ежегодное голосование от PortSwigger - отличный способ наверстать крутые ресёрчи, которые пропустил за год. Решил собрать клиентсайдные работы, которые точно заслуживают внимания: Make Self-XSS Great Again — от меня Превращаем self-XSS в полноценный stored XSS через credentialless iframes + login CSRF. Плюс абьюз fetchLater() для отложенных действий после закрытия вкладки. (Да, включать свою статью нем

31👍12💅6

Signed Slonser

8 Jan 2026, 16:13 UTC≈3,800 views33 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Немного на днях сгорело как же плоха работа с output MCP Описал то что пришло в голову здесь https://blog.slonser.info/posts/smugglle-ai-ouputs/

😁16👍9🔥7🤬1

Signed Slonser

31 Dec 2025, 21:51 UTC≈4,640 views66 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026

А теперь уже точно всех с новым счастьем) Следующий бокал поднимается за вас всех!

38🍾19🔥9

Signed Slonser

31 Dec 2025, 12:32 UTC≈4,320 views86 reactions20 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот и подходит уже новый 2026 год. Так что пора подвести черту 2025 года, а так же подумать что нас ждёт в 2026 году. Букв много, можете просто прочитать послесловие) [Выступления] В этом году получил первый масштабный опыт выступления на международных конференциях, выступать в Японии и Корее оказалось не простым вызовом. Но обрадовала, что реакция публики была положительной - https://metamask.io/news/metamask-secur

66🔥14👍6

Signed Slonser

24 Dec 2025, 22:17 UTC≈6,400 views206 reactions13 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пентест минцифры зашёл слишком далеко

😁14735🐳18😈4🤮2

Signed Slonser

3 Dec 2025, 19:34 UTC≈12,200 views65 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026

https://react.dev/blog/2025/12/03/critical-security-vulnerability-in-react-server-components React UNAUTH RCE CVSS 10 По патчу успел понять в чем проблема (PoC пока пишу) Уже сейчас могу сказать что похоже действительно уязвимы прям стандартные версии То есть разработчику не нужно даже написать стремный код / использовать конкретный модуль Достаточно написать: npx create-next-app То есть имеем очень страшное RCE by d

36🤯16🔥8💅3😁2

Signed Slonser

3 Dec 2025, 07:21 UTC≈5,380 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Очень крутой доклад с TROOPERS25 Такого хорошо собранного материала в одном месте по CSS атакам ещё не видел https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Owp-mHUyg9I

🔥20💅7

Signed Slonser

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @slonser_notes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 177,027 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Заметки Слонсера” (@slonser_notes), 3,021 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slonser_notes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.