Channel
@sliseads
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
895subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002524601833 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sliseads |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sliseads |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 895 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 897 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 899 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 902 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 902 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 May 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
88 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 60 | 68.2% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 19.3% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 6.82% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 4.55% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The Red Pill for Crypto Marketers: five hard truths. 1/ A review of the popular crypto-traffic sources with everything that's good and everything nobody tells you. 2/ Spoiler: most «crypto traffic» is content-site readers, not users in a wallet. The gap between those two audiences is the whole difference between clicks and conversions. 3/ Full breakdown on the blog. slise.xyz
👍2❤1🔥1
0.46% CTR. Industry average is 0.1%. QuickNode sells infrastructure to developers - one of the narrowest audiences in crypto. No trick: the ads ran where devs already sit - inside block explorers, mid-debug across Ethereum, Optimism, Base. 0.1% usually isn't a small audience. It's the wrong room - people working, not scrolling. slise.xyz/case-studies
❤3
Their platform. Their numbers. Their homework. Every ad network grades its own test - the impressions it counts, in the dashboard it controls. We show the work instead: which publishers ran your creative, which chains they map to, CTR per placement - not one blended number. You see where budget went and what each site returned. That's the difference between a report and a receipt. slise.xyz
❤2
50 creatives. A 20x spread. 1/ Two hardware wallet giants ran on Slise at the same time - right as Ledger's recovery-feature controversy made everyone re-check where their seed phrase lives. Trezor leaned into secure seed-phrase messaging and pulled 1.5x the CTR. 2/ The bigger number: across 50+ creatives tested, the spread between the best and the worst banner was 20x. Same audience, same placements - only the cre…
❤2👍1
🟢 The rail that guts ad-tech is already live - and it's crypto Everyone's debating whether AI agents will kill ad-tech. Nobody's saying the obvious part. The payment rails being built for those agents - Google's x402, Stripe on Base, Mastercard's Agent Pay - already settle on-chain, because cards can't do sub-cent payments at machine speed. And if the money moves onchain, the session does too. Right into the dApps a…
❤3
Best time to reach a degen isn't while they're reading about you. It's while they're on an explorer pulling up your competitor's contract. Pure intent - comparing, checking, deciding - on a page you can run an ad on. Don't need their identity. Just need to be in the room when they choose. Slise puts you there, by chain.
❤2
«Brand-safe» as a blocklist doesn't survive contact with crypto. The risk isn't a few bad sites you dodge - it's the whole farmed layer. Recycled news, bot threads, pages built only to print impressions. You can't blocklist an entire content economy. An explorer's the opposite - safe because degens use it to move real money, not because someone vetted it. Put the ad in the tool, not next to the noise. Slise does th…
❤4
The best moment to reach a buyer isn't when they're reading about you. It's when they're on an explorer checking out your competitor. Verifying a rival's contract, comparing, deciding - pure intent, on a page you can run an ad on. Slise places you there, by chain. You don't need to know who they are. Just be in the room when they decide. slise.xyz
🔥4
Everyone obsesses over CTR. This campaign was won on CPM. We ran Coinsbee inside the dApps its buyers actually use - explorers, screeners, dashboards. Clicks were strong (0.58% CTR, ~6x the norm). But the real win was cheap, relevant inventory: reaching a real crypto buyer came out at Web2 prices. A great click rate on overpriced placements still loses money. Where you show up beats how clever the banner is. slise.…
❤3
QuickNode sells infra to developers - one of the narrowest audiences in crypto. Their ads ran at 0.46% CTR. Industry average is ~0.1%. No trick. The ads ran where devs already sit - inside block explorers, mid-debug across Ethereum, Optimism, Base. 0.1% usually isn't a small audience. It's the wrong room - they're working, not scrolling. slise.xyz
❤2🔥2
Run a Solana product's ads on Ethereum explorers and you'll get great reach and almost no signups. That's not the creative - it's geography. A Base user and a Solana user can't even use your product without bridging first. Wrong chain isn't a weaker click. It's a click that was never going to convert. Slise targets by chain: Solana on Solscan, BirdEye, GeckoTerminal; Base on Basescan and Aerodrome. slise.xyz
❤3🔥1
A sybil farm can spin up a thousand wallets before lunch. It still can't fake real users onchain. Wallet counts measure scripts. Real sessions signal intent. Slise targets the page, not the wallet - ads inside dApps and explorers, by chain. slise.xyz
❤3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sliseads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“slise.xyz” (@sliseads), 895 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sliseads.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.