Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

О7 : @:Ş𝗹𝗮𝗸êş𝗵𝗶 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢

@slakeshi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

72subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002629660851
TypeChannel
Username@slakeshi
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/slakeshi

Growth

7211 Aug 2026, 11:47 — 72 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 09:03 — 72 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 11:4712 Aug 2026, 09:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71–73 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:0372no change
11 Aug 2026, 11:4772first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 1 post, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5454077208530288469321.4%
custom 5456200249519405824321.4%
custom 5456253137746687386321.4%
custom 545401413693554456717.14%
custom 545621172137705417117.14%
custom 545630763658670712917.14%
custom 545650109050365321717.14%
custom 545651916802100389217.14%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 27 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Mar 2026, 15:20 UTC221 viewsread 11 August 2026

Пиветик набор закрыт временно

Signed Fazya

15 Feb 2026, 07:37 UTC361 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

…N3w Un#0n :\\ I’m s00 LucKYY << Y0u and M33 08 :(💜) [착하다는 말이 제일 싫어] — Надеемся на долгий и крепкий союз!

Signed Fazya

15 Feb 2026, 07:06 UTC243 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

Сегоgня, 15.О2.2О26, gва чყgecных флყցα зɑׁׅƙׁׅлючυׁׅлυׁׅ сᨵׁׅׅюз ! ! . @ уσυ & @ ოе . Нɑׁׅgееmcя нɑׁׅ хоթօամй сᨵׁׅюzׁׅ֬ !

Signed +007 F

14 Feb 2026, 10:45 UTC194 viewsread 11 August 2026

Набор на союзы емли что тоже открыт 😘 Писать тем же

Signed +007 Fāzya

14 Feb 2026, 10:44 UTC188 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Всех с днем Святого Валентина 🎁 Проведите праздник со своими любимыми 💕 А у нас открыт набор! Вступайте 🥺 Писать: @fazyuta , @TrueJiwonGirl

custom 54540772085302884693custom 54562002495194058243custom 54562531377466873863custom 54540141369355445671custom 54562117213770541711custom 54563076365867071291custom 54565010905036532171custom 54565191680210038921

Signed +007 Fāzya

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @slakeshi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,195,198 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“О7 : @:Ş𝗹𝗮𝗸êş𝗵𝗶 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢” (@slakeshi), 72 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slakeshi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.