Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

СКРЕЖЕТПРАВДЫ

@skregetru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

43subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002231733552
TypeChannel
Username@skregetru
DescriptionБольшая война на пороге
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/skregetru

Growth

437 August 2026 — 43 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42–44 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 16:3143no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:5143first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.9%
avg views ÷ 43 subscribers
Avg views / post
15.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (2 January 202624 July 2026)
Views total15
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
139
Videos
146
Links
15

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15m 54s
Average length
2m 39s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍728.0%
🔥728.0%
🙏416.0%
👀28.00%
🤔28.00%
14.00%
💯14.00%
😁14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 January 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2026, 06:29 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Бензиновый дефицит — это не только про бензин. Это про попытку раскачать общество через бытовую злость. Мы смотрим на то, что происходит на заправках, и видим очень знакомую механику: там, где раньше работало пять колонок, сейчас открыты две. Формально бензин есть, табло горит, заправка работает, но поток искусственно сужен. Машины стоят, очередь растёт, люди нервничают, начинают звонить знакомым, писать в чаты, сни

🔥1

3 Jul 2026, 06:29 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Нужна холодная голова и жёсткая фиксация фактов: Где закрывают колонки? Где искусственно режут поток? Где создают очереди при наличии топлива? Где независимые АЗС задирают цену? Где местные власти спят? Где сети играют в мутные схемы? Где проблема объективная, а где её усиливают руками? Потому что дефицит — это не всегда когда товара нет. Иногда дефицит — это когда товар есть, но людям специально показывают, что ег

👀1

25 May 2026, 04:43 UTC43 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @rusengineer

Мне вот интересно, когда у нас наконец то созреют соответствующие ЛПР, и забудут заклинание "как бы чего не вышло", и начнут считать деньги. Казённые деньги. Деньги налогоплательщиков, черт побери... На деньги от шоу, точнее за доли процента от этих сумм, специалисты по очень разнообразным вопросам могут, готовы и ждут отмашку, чтоб повторить сюжет с приключениями одного молодого уебка из Днепропетровска. Который на

👍1

26 Apr 2026, 19:52 UTC55 viewsread 10 August 2026

Дмитрий Песков, пресс-секретарь президента, отметил, что Россия, будучи частью Европы, не может представлять для нее главную угрозу. КТО НИБУТЬ ПОДСКАЖИТЕ ЕМУ ПОЧИТАТЬ ИСТОРИЮ, МЫ ДЛЯ ЕВРОПЫ ВСЕГДА БУДЕМ ВРАГОМ ПРОСТО ПОТОМУ ЧТО У НАС ЕСТЬ ЧТО ЗАБРАТЬ...

13 Apr 2026, 10:30 UTC72 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Говорят, что «поздний» Жванецкий, всю свою жизнь критиковавший советскую власть, написал следующее: О СОВЕТСКОЙ РОДИНЕ «Она была суровой, совсем не ласковой с виду. Не гламурной. Не приторно любезной. У неё не было на это времени. Да и желания не было. И происхождение подкачало. Простой она была. Всю жизнь, сколько помню, она работала. Много. Очень много. Занималась всем сразу. И прежде всего — нами, оболтусами.

👀1🔥1

12 Apr 2026, 04:54 UTC58 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

С ПРАЗДНИКОМ ПРАВОСЛАВНЫЕ

🙏4

28 Mar 2026, 19:30 UTC47 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

10 лет назад Вагнера взяли Пальмиру... Победа которую продали.

🤔2

16 Mar 2026, 07:42 UTC72 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Телега все... эпитафия.

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @skregetru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СКРЕЖЕТПРАВДЫ” (@skregetru), 43 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skregetru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.