Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Колонка скептика🤦🙄🤷🏻‍♂️

Channel

Колонка скептика🤦🙄🤷🏻‍♂️

@skeptikbek

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,881subscribers

+256 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001347036203
TypeChannel
Username@skeptikbek
Description🇷🇺Авторский канал Бекзода Рустамбекова. 🇺🇿Bekzod Rustambekovning shaxsiy sahifasi 🇬🇧Author's channel of Bekzod Rustambekov Обратная связь t.me/kommunaIka
Created13 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/skeptikbek

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,6156,9286,771.56 August 2026 — 6,625 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,625 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,620 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,616 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,615 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,646 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,651 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,647 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,655 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,654 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,666 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,669 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,736 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,751 subscribers28 September 2026 — 6,763 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,749 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,831 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,859 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,861 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,894 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,922 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,923 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,928 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,912 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,906 subscribers7 November 2026 — 6,890 subscribers10 November 2026 — 6,881 subscribers6,8816 August 202610 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 96 days, net +256. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,568–6,975 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 21:586,881-9
7 Nov 2026, 17:076,890-16
4 Nov 2026, 16:516,906-6
1 Nov 2026, 18:576,912-16
29 Oct 2026, 13:596,928+5
26 Oct 2026, 13:366,923+1
23 Oct 2026, 19:396,922+28
20 Oct 2026, 14:286,894+33
17 Oct 2026, 23:156,861+2
14 Oct 2026, 20:216,859+28
11 Oct 2026, 20:006,831+82
5 Oct 2026, 16:176,749-14
28 Sept 2026, 09:566,763+12
18 Sept 2026, 13:366,751+15
13 Sept 2026, 23:196,736+67
10 Sept 2026, 14:226,669+3
5 Sept 2026, 15:396,666+12
1 Sept 2026, 13:286,654-1
29 Aug 2026, 10:566,655+8
26 Aug 2026, 02:446,647first reading

Engagement

59 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.8%
avg views ÷ 6,881 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,010
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 59 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held59 (29 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total75,360
Reactions total3,651
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 16:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,890
Videos
≈3,920
Links
≈9,890

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
32m 33s
Average length
1m 18s

Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

9,370 reactions across 57 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯4,58849.0%
👍1,91520.4%
🤬96710.3%
😁4975.30%
🍾3113.32%
🙏2903.09%
custom 53283120534782022822893.08%
😢1751.87%
custom 53818883903565413731171.25%
😭900.961%
🤣860.918%
👎300.32%
😍150.16%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,370 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 59 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @skeptikbek. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 59 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (8.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 05:33 UTC≈1,890 views131 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💯104👍20🙏7

8 Nov 2026, 05:32 UTC≈1,890 views89 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍64🙏17💯8

8 Nov 2026, 02:44 UTC≈2,190 views179 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Трагедия с водителем 82-го автобуса, погибшим под колесами собственной машины, уже обросла официальными формулировками. Версия транспортников звучит просто и предельно удобно: высадил пассажиров, забыл поставить на ручник, вышел, машина покатилась. Человеческий фактор, дежурные соболезнования, дело можно сдавать в архив. Но если посмотреть на реальные кадры с места ЧП, сухая канцелярская версия начинает трещать по ш…

💯135😭29👍9custom 53283120534782022824🍾2

7 Nov 2026, 05:07 UTC≈2,140 views125 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

«Bitta knopka bilan masala hal» — именно под таким соусом гаражные кулибины впаривают нашим асфальтовым приматам абонемент на слабоумие. Присобачил на бампер китайскую рамку с моторчиком, жмакнул кнопку на пульте — и вуаля! Ты уже не заурядный водятел в ташкентской пробке, а Неуловимый Джо. Местный «катта кўча», вертевший законы физики и ПДД на карданном валу. Поразительно, с какой телячьей наивностью великовозрастн…

💯108🤬17

7 Nov 2026, 01:00 UTC≈2,090 views183 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Казалось бы, в удивительное время живем. В годы нашей юности воспаленные фантазии многих погорелых голов оставались в их уютных кукушках и не покидали свои гнезда. Но цифровая эпоха вручила пациентам шестой палаты грандиозный рупор, позволив воплощать свои самые «няшные» и дикие воображалки в жизнь. Мы стали свидетелями очередного шедевра: юный вершитель судеб закапывает черный мешок, водружает знамена и пафосно веща…

💯148👍23🤬9custom 53818883903565413732custom 53283120534782022821

6 Nov 2026, 12:51 UTC≈2,630 views262 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Очередной рыцарь джизакского асфальта на своей тонированной колеснице хладнокровно раскатал по дороге собаку с щенками. Местная правоохранительная машина натужно скрипнула шестеренками и выдала грандиозный финал: нарушителя привлекли по 111-й статье, выписав штраф от 7 до 10 БРВ. Дело в архиве, протоколы подшиты, Фемида может идти пить чай. Но абсолютный шедевр цинизма кроется даже не в этом смехотворном штрафе, экв…

🤬194💯55😭11custom 53283120534782022822

6 Nov 2026, 00:04 UTC≈2,440 views110 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Всем салом! На календаре пятница — время выдыхать, сворачивать рабочие дела и готовиться к традиционному Жума намазу. Но перед тем как мы все окончательно уйдем в режим выходных, держите шикарную пищу для ума. Помните «Игру престолов»? До выхода этого сериала слово «бастард» пылилось где-то на задворках исторических словарей. Но благодаря франшизе оно обрело совершенно новый вайб. Для нашего поколения бастард — это …

💯45👍35😁16👎9custom 53283120534782022825

4 Nov 2026, 07:09 UTC≈2,480 views149 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @Tashkent_Land

‼️Даже нотариус и кадастр не гарантия: в Узбекистане можно легко потерять законно купленную квартиру ❌ В стране продолжают появляться истории, когда граждане приобретают недвижимость, оформляют сделки у нотариуса, регистрируют право собственности в кадастре, начинают ремонт, а спустя время узнают, что квартира стала предметом судебного спора. 👉 Как пишет «Газета.uz», сразу несколько семей в Ташкенте оказались в п…

💯124🤬13👍8😭4

4 Nov 2026, 02:18 UTC≈2,720 views110 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Желаю всем бодрого и абсолютно сухого дня! Пусть сегодня прорывает исключительно на смех, а не трубы в стояке. И если этот суровый мануал по выживанию вдруг однажды спасет ваш ламинат — не забудьте поднять бокал за эту отважную ликвидаторшу! t.me/skeptikbek

😁97custom 53818883903565413737🤬6

31 Oct 2026, 00:53 UTC≈4,170 views113 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Только вчера я официально объявил об уходе в цифровой дзен, решив взять небольшую паузу, чтобы посвятить время семье и восстановить внутренний баланс. Я честно пытался. Но не совсем прямые руки наших бесценных ИТ-специалистов просто не дают мне покоя даже во время объявленного на весь мир перерыва. Увидев новости о том, что со следующего года езда без экостикеров будет караться драконовскими штрафами, я решил побыть…

💯90😭14👍6👎3

30 Oct 2026, 09:18 UTC≈4,510 views150 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Громкое «раздадут» в заголовке звучит так, будто деньги будут раскидывать с вертолета, но на деле это никакой не аттракцион невиданной щедрости. Средства не раздают, а крайне избирательно выделяют в виде адресной помощи по жестким социальным критериям. Цель вполне прагматична — смягчить для уязвимых слоев болезненный шок от перехода на рыночные тарифы, так что раскатывать губу не стоит: право на эту компенсацию еще п…

💯83😁43🤬17😭7

30 Oct 2026, 00:32 UTC≈3,900 views383 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Доброе утро, друзья! В последнее время я всё чаще ловлю себя на мысли, что мне катастрофически не хватает времени на самое главное — на семью и, к сожалению, на самого себя. Написание публикаций требует огромных внутренних ресурсов, времени и отдачи. Поэтому сейчас я решил взять небольшую паузу. Можно сказать, я ушел на «низкий старт», чтобы восстановить баланс, перевести дух и позволить себе временно больше получать…

👍230custom 532831205347820228271🙏57💯22😁3

Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @skeptikbek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Oct 2026, 17:27 UTCAnonymous Poll284 voters

Юнусабадцы, как у вас сейчас обстановка за окном? Жители других районов, тоже делитесь сводками. Пишите в комментариях свои ориентиры.

  1. На Юнусабаде запах подтверждаю.19%
  2. Живу в другом районе, у нас тоже неприятно пахнет (район укажу в комментариях).40%
  3. Никакого запаха не чувствую, воздух нормальный.19%
  4. Сижу с наглухо закрытыми окнами, ничего не замечаю.26%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Aktualno.uz
@aktualnomedia · 41,432
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
Vesti.UZ
@vestiuz · 25,032
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
Tashkent_Land
@Tashkent_Land · 34,288
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
NOVA24 — LIVE
@nova24live · 30,682
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
Потребитель.Уз
@potrebitel_uz · 38,637
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
NOVA24 — Новости Узбекистана
@nova24uz · 34,982
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
Подслушано Знаменитости
@overhearstar · 42,703
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
Islam Kaparzo
@Kaparzo_Islam · 91,003
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
⭐️Золотой Город⭐️
@zolotoygorod · 38,226
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 31 August 2026
АН Podrobno.uz - Новости Узбекистана - (официальный канал)
@podrobno · 57,136
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Uztube - Агентство новостей Podrobno.uz
@uztubepodrobno · 23,783
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
ADME
@adme_ru_official · 22,867
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
РЕАЛЬНЫЕ НОВОСТИ УЗБЕКИСТАНА
@RealUzbekistan · 36,529
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 1 September 2026
Пенсионеры Онлайн
@pensioneryonline · 72,942
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 20 August 2026
BLITZ+
@blitzplus · 30,606
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 6 September 2026
Эффект Макаренко
@makarenko_channel · 35,975
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
Вездеходы🚸🏆
@vezdekhodiuz · 22,122
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 24 September 2026
Врачи Узбекистана
@vrachi_uzbekistana · 23,491
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 18 September 2026
Эхо Узбекистана
@ExoUzbekistana · 24,258
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
Новости Узбекистана 24/7
@Novosti24Uzbekistana · 58,620
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 22 August 2026
Эвент.uz - Новости Узбекистана
@event24uz · 60,588
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 21 August 2026
Ташкент Сегодня
@tashkent_segodnya · 57,994
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
Актуальные Новости
@actualnewsuz · 20,759
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 September 2026
EveryDay.uz | Узбекистан 🇺🇿
@uzbhub · 20,258
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 September 2026

This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Колонка скептика🤦🙄🤷🏻‍♂️” (@skeptikbek), 6,881 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skeptikbek.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.