2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 269–271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 00:18
270
no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:33
270
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
49.6%
avg views ÷ 270 subscribers
Avg views / post
134
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held
17 (30 April 2026 – 30 July 2026)
Views total
804
Reactions total
73
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 00:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
181
Videos
4
Links
47
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
142 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
31
21.8%
👾
21
14.8%
❤
18
12.7%
👀
16
11.3%
🆒
8
5.63%
⚡
7
4.93%
😁
7
4.93%
🤩
6
4.23%
🦄
6
4.23%
❤🔥
4
2.82%
👻
4
2.82%
😱
4
2.82%
🏆
3
2.11%
🍓
2
1.41%
👏
2
1.41%
💘
1
0.704%
🙏
1
0.704%
🥰
1
0.704%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩🤩 Камчатка сама себя не исследует
Если тебе мало лаб и хочется своими руками творить будущее — вот шанс!
⚡️ До 2 августа можно попасть в исследовательскую школу по геотермальной энергетике.
Сначала онлайн, потом — экспедиция на Камчатку. Не экскурсия, а работа на действующих геотермальных объектах вместе с учёными и индустриальными партнёрами.
Три этапа погружения в науку:
💚 База (онлайн курс, без отбора)
💚 Шест…
🐝 Минус 40? Для него это рабочая температура.
Полностью автономный снегоуборщик «Объект 314», разработанный инженерами из Polytech Voltage Machine (@voltage_machine) успешно прошёл испытания в условиях, максимально приближённых к Крайнему Северу.
Высокопроходимая платформа самостоятельно строит маршрут, объезжает препятствия и убирает снег, пока оператор наблюдает за её работой из тёплого помещения.
Это уже не прос…
Сегодня мы на Цунами Пикник со своим выставочным болидом Quattro 🌵
Если вы тоже где-то рядом, будем рады встретить у стенда! 😀
@skb_polytech @studkb
#ЛенСпортМаш #ПолитехПетра #FormulaStudent #FS #формуластудент #PolytechNCM
🟩 В X-Lab завершился ещё один сезон
За два семестра студенты программ ПИШ ЦИ прошли полный цикл разработки инженерного изделия: от постановки задачи до испытаний готового прототипа.
Ребята работали с реальными заказчиками, ограничениями, ошибками, десятками итераций и поиском решений.
🔺 За этот год команды создали реабилитационные устройства, медицинскую технику, 3D-мышь для CAD-систем, экструдер для печати мягким…
🔺 Пока одни смотрят, как делают технологии будущего —
другие уже собирают их своими руками.
🩶 СОРЕВНОВАНИЯ СТУДЕНЧЕСКИХ КОНСТРУКТОРСКИХ БЮРО: ОСТРОВ ИНЖЕНЕРОВ
🟩 «Остров инженеров» — это место, где инженерное дело перестаёт быть теорией.
Здесь заходят в реальные задачи, работают в командах, спорят, проектируют, тестируют и доводят решения до результата.
⚙️ Полный цикл:
от идеи и моделирования — до прототипа и защи…
⚡4👾3🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @skb_polytech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 347,616 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СКБ Системный инжиниринг | СПбПУ” (@skb_polytech), 270 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skb_polytech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.