Channel
@skamfrk1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003939408782 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @skamfrk1 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 8 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/skamfrk1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 26 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 26 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В этом сообщении описывается первый случай мошенничества, который получил одобрение таких пользователей, как @saver_frk @Katrin888gold @pampperrs @eeeevchiiiikk @yannixcheck, @rezonansfrk. 😑 их также поддержали модераторы: @sobachkinns, @PRODAU_SHALAV, @zetolky и @Krimz1488 😝 После того как они одобрили этот случай, они заблокировали @Kizarow, обвинив его в мошенничестве. Когда у них попросили предоставить доказате…
❤2
Первый случай мошенничества произошёл примерно в конце февраля. Недавно пользователь с ником @VetusPredator снова обманул людей на 1020$. 😕 Общий ущерб составил 2800$. 🫨
подтверждение слов от @saver_frk, что разрешили обмануть @Kizarow на 1800$😳
Я был модератором проекта, а затем получил должность администратора. Однако затем я покинул проект, и, к сожалению, произошёл скам. Администрации и владельцам проекта следовало более тщательно рассмотреть ситуацию и обязать виновных вернуть деньги. Однако они поступили совершенно иначе. Они заблокировали меня за скам, но при запросе доказательств не предоставили ответа. Также они блокируют моих участников проекта …
В этом посте я хочу рассказать о том, как общаются администраторы фрк, а также игнор со стороны новых владельцев (бывших админов) 🚫. Они не отвечают на вопросы о проекте 🤔 и переходят на личности, позволяя себе оскорбления 😠. Кроме того, скам-скамер разрешен ✅, но они банят за скам участников, которые даже не скамили Также были высказаны претензии монополистов, которые сотрудничали 5 месяцев 🤝. В ответ на эти заявл…
Пользователь @acygrace приобрёл рекламу в ФРК, однако администратор ФРК «@yannixcheck» решил воспользоваться этим и начал рекламировать свою приёмку. Паркер пообещал разобраться в ситуации. Через некоторое время у @acygrace возникла проблема, которую он не мог решить самостоятельно (она связана с скамом). Он написал модераторам, но ответа не последовало. Затем он обратился к Паркеру, и тот прямо предложил ему заплат…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @skamfrk1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SCAM FRK” (@skamfrk1), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skamfrk1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.