Channel
@sk_deleted
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
239subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003868246549 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sk_deleted |
| Created | 3 February 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sk_deleted |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 239 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 242 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 243 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 243 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 3 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
293 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 152 | 51.9% | |
| 🤣 | 54 | 18.4% | |
| 👎 | 22 | 7.51% | |
| 😁 | 22 | 7.51% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 4.44% | |
| 💩 | 10 | 3.41% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 2.73% | |
| 🍌 | 7 | 2.39% | |
| 😨 | 2 | 0.683% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.341% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.341% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.341% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 293reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2026 to 25 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اینا دارن ترول می کنن دیگه؟ یارو ۱۰ از ۱۰ه مگه ممکنه اینقدر دختر بگن از پسر بور خوششون نمیاد و کامنتاشون چند کا لایک بگیره نظر خودتون رو دایرکت بفرمایید، همرو میخونم
👍10❤1👎1
تا اینجای کار پسر ها خیلی ایشون می پسندن دخترا هنوز نظری اعلام نکردن
😁21👍2
جواب بچه ها به طور کلی: 1-پسرای بور رو خانواده و فامیل از اول دوست داشتن و همه جوره قبول می شده سر همین کمتر روی رفتار و کلامشون کار می کنن، همین باعث میشه هرکی باهاشون وارد رابطه میشه تجربه بدی پیدا کنه همینو برای همدیگه تعریف می کنن و نتیجه میشه اینکه همشون میگن بور کنسله 2- اکثر دخترا تنها نقطه قوتشون زیبابی هست وقتی پسر اینهمه زیبا باشه، احساس ضعف می کنن دوست دارن برن سراغ پسری که جلوش احساس ضعف و ناتوانی نکنن…
❤9
و یچی دیگه هم که دخترا گفتن اینه که با موی بلوندش مشکل دارن پوست سفیدش اوکیه
👍3
نتیجه تا اینجا: هیچ بنی بشی تو تاریخ بشریت از این راه نتیجه نگرفت ولی خیلیا کلی پول به کصگاو زدن در راهش امتحان نکنید
👍21
خیلی توی اینستا پست دیدم که ملت میرن تو کافه تنها می شینن که دوست دختر/پسر پیدا کنن اما تو عمرم من ندیدم که تو دنیای واقعی یکی بگه از کافه وارد رابطه شده آیا شما همچین موردی رو تو عمرتون مشاهده کردین؟ دایرکت بگین نتیجه کلی رو میزنم چنل که همه بهره مند بشن
👎21👍4
Video, posted without a caption
🤣7💩1😐1
خیلی جاها شنیدم که دخترا به باسن پسرا نگاه می کنن تو اینستا هم کلیپاشو می بینم اما واقعا نمیتونم درک کنم دخترای کانال توی دایرکت بگن که واقعیت داره یا نه نتیجه کلی رو میزنم چنل که همه ببینن
👍11💩1
نتایج تا الان: 8 تا آره و یه نه یکیشون هم گفته نگاه می کنن که تو جمع دوستاشون بگن فلان پسره سهم مارو خورده
👍6💩2
و تا دلتون بخواد پسر هست که میگن به باسن پسرا چشم دارن
🤣37👍3😨2💩1🔥1
البته اینم اضافه کنم که توهم نزنید که هر دختری کیرتون کرد فکر کنین عاشق شماست ببینید که اصلا ایا منطقیه اون دختر از شما خوشش بیاد؟ مثلا اگر شما یه پسر معمولی هستین، اگر یه دختر خیلی داف و درجه یک این رفتارو با شما بکنه، شما باید بفهمین که اون واقعا از شما بدش اومده، چون صد تا پسر بهتر برای اون هستن ولی اگه به دختر معمولی همون رفتارو کرد احتمالش خیلی بیشتره که خوشش اومده باشه(البته هنوزم فقط یه احتماله)
👍32🤣7🍌3💔1💩1
این جور کامنتارو توی اینستا می بینم که لایک های نجومی میخورن یه حسی درونم هست که میگه اینی که نوشته حقیقت نداره و لایکِ پسرایی رو گرفته که باهاشون بد رفتاری شده، چون بهشون امید داده نظر شما چیه؟ توی دایرکت بنویسید همرو میخونم
👍34❤2💩1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @sk_deleted. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پاک شده های شارک میم” (@sk_deleted), 239 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sk_deleted.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.