Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝑺𝑳𝑰𝑽𝑬𝑹 𝑮𝑰𝑹𝑳/ 𝑨.𝑺. #бусинка

@sk1vrsp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

100subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004293654099
TypeChannel
Username@sk1vrsp
Description𝟏𝟒+ 𝙡𝙪𝙫 — @vickrqm 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙩 — 𝟑.𝟎𝟔.𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔. (𝟐𝟕.𝟎𝟕.𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔) 𝙞𝙣𝙛𝙤 — @infopnss #𝙛𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙚 — 𝙞𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙤𝙣 𝙢𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙖𝙜𝙚 💋. #бусинка
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 28 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/sk1vrsp

Growth

10010 Aug 2026, 06:47 — 100 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 07:00 — 100 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 06:4710 Aug 2026, 07:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 99–101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 07:00100no change
10 Aug 2026, 06:47100first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
157.8%
avg views ÷ 100 subscribers
Avg views / post
158
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held11 (28 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,578
Reactions total121
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
13
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

121 reactions across 4 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52111746974498520782823.1%
custom 53821679368929710431714.0%
custom 53008166478068108451613.2%
custom 54044695588723973641411.6%
custom 5328230586538540260119.09%
custom 536646468176028640297.44%
custom 535753986856821847486.61%
custom 586379421786780918686.61%
custom 542931848300544369654.13%
custom 601279040864230288432.48%
custom 524923989308267145621.65%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC149 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

пост?

  1. воспоминания из детства 🙂20%
  2. сюжетный пост 🙂40%
  3. зарисовка (темы будут позже) 🙂60%
  4. — flare. 🔥30%

The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC161 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Мнение, мягко говоря, очень плохое. Никогда и ни в каком виде педофилию поддерживать нельзя, а писать посты с таким содержанием, даже если это часть сюжета, не стоило. Я прочитала этот пост уже после удаления дв Абигайл. Честно говоря, спасибо ей на том, что не описала в подробностях полноценное соитие, это бы добило. Я согласна со словами дарс о том, что эта тема ОЧЕНЬ триггерная, особенно для девочек. Статистика до

custom 52111746974498520784custom 53282305865385402604custom 53008166478068108453

1 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC169 views49 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 не рекомендуется читать людям до 16-18 лет. katie bell: @katiessxl ginnie weasley: @f0XWeAs1EY 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ (and message)🌟 #𝑯𝑶𝑮𝑾𝑨𝑹𝑻𝑺; #𝑨𝑼 #𝑯𝑬𝑨𝑫𝑪𝑨𝑵𝑵𝑶𝑵𝑺: 🤩транные сны Алисии и пропавшая троица. 🌟🌟 🤩лисия чувствовала, что ⭐⭐ начинает сходить с ума: ⭐⭐ ей всё чаще мерещится 🌟🌟странное: тихое шипение ⭐⭐ по ночам, отрубленная голова женщины преследовавшая её везде, в каждом сне, в пустой библиотеке,

custom 521117469744985207811custom 530081664780681084511custom 53575398685682184747custom 58637942178678091866custom 54044695588723973645custom 53282305865385402603custom 53821679368929710433custom 54293184830054436963

29 Jul 2026, 15:48 UTC174 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

как вы оцените мой дневник?

  1. 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡65%
  2. 🤡🤡🤡🤡15%
  3. 🤡🤡🤡8%
  4. 🤡🤡0%
  5. 🤡8%
  6. — flare. 🔥15%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

29 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC138 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (оглавление в комментариях☠️). ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 😀😀😀😀🤩анавес, яркий 😀😀😀😀 свет прожекторов и 😀😀😀😀 весёлый ведущий 😀😀😀😀 ростом Спиннет 😀😀😀😀 где-то по грудь. Цирковая арена встретила Алисию привычным запахом попкорна и волшебных лягушек, которые все запивают искрящейся газировкой. А ещё бумажками, на которых были написаны номера. Алисии выпал номер 11. Она ещё не знала, что розовый талончик сломает

custom 54044695588723973645custom 53821679368929710434custom 52111746974498520783custom 53008166478068108452custom 53282305865385402602custom 58637942178678091862custom 53575398685682184741

28 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC184 views42 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 😈🤩ружба — это то, что даже 😈в самые тёмные дни 😈 согреет душу. 😈🤩 даже в сумашествии не 😈забудутся моменты, 😈наполненные смехом, 😈теплом и любовью. 🤩итать. (кликабельно. сам кн лист будет в комментариях.) 🐾 — в чистках не участвую. прошу ставить автоматом!!!

custom 521117469744985207810custom 538216793689297104310custom 53664646817602864029custom 54044695588723973644custom 60127904086423028843custom 52492398930826714562custom 53282305865385402602custom 54293184830054436962

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @sk1vrsp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

пост?

  1. воспоминания из детства 🙂20%
  2. сюжетный пост 🙂40%
  3. зарисовка (темы будут позже) 🙂60%
  4. — flare. 🔥30%

The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

29 Jul 2026, 15:48 UTCAnonymous Poll26 voters

как вы оцените мой дневник?

  1. 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡65%
  2. 🤡🤡🤡🤡15%
  3. 🤡🤡🤡8%
  4. 🤡🤡0%
  5. 🤡8%
  6. — flare. 🔥15%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 945,052 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑺𝑳𝑰𝑽𝑬𝑹 𝑮𝑰𝑹𝑳/ 𝑨.𝑺. #бусинка” (@sk1vrsp), 100 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sk1vrsp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.