Posted without readable text
custom 593580855299513329510custom 52604985786184750315custom 54224597251763963915custom 53575398685682184743custom 52602366156782028362custom 53592977815026043452custom 53570573289925145891custom 58506128386823366551

Channel
@f0XWeAs1EY
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
108subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003998693082 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @f0XWeAs1EY |
| Description | 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐫| @WEASLEYYY_BOT 𝐥𝐨𝐯𝐞| @Lord0Riddle 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨| @inf0xxweasl Renata Ri. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 27 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/f0XWeAs1EY |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 108 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 108 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (27 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,552 |
| Reactions total | 324 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
324 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5935808552995133295 | 59 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5850612838682336655 | 54 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5422459725176396391 | 51 | 15.7% | |
| custom 5260498578618475031 | 40 | 12.3% | |
| custom 5357539868568218474 | 32 | 9.88% | |
| custom 5357057328992514589 | 31 | 9.57% | |
| custom 5260236615678202836 | 29 | 8.95% | |
| custom 5359297781502604345 | 28 | 8.64% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 324reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @f0XWeAs1EY. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
custom 593580855299513329510custom 52604985786184750315custom 54224597251763963915custom 53575398685682184743custom 52602366156782028362custom 53592977815026043452custom 53570573289925145891custom 58506128386823366551
Video message, posted without a caption
🤩🤩🤩🔤жинни и Кэти с 🤩🤩🤩трудом отыскали 🤩🤩🤩свободный столик 🤩в самом дальнем, но очень тёплом углу — прямо у камина, заставленного парящими свечами. 🔤кинув на спинки стульев намокшие от снега шарфы и варежки, они бессильно откинулись назад. Щеки обеих горели румянцем от резкой смены температуры, а пальцы приятного кололи от возвращающегося тепла. 🔤эти быстро сходила к стойке и вернулась с двумя огромными глиняными кр…
custom 54224597251763963916custom 52602366156782028364custom 53570573289925145893custom 58506128386823366553custom 52604985786184750311custom 53575398685682184741
🤩🤩🤩🔤эти Белл.. Это 🤩🤩🤩буквально мысль, 🤩🤩🤩от которой 🤩невозможно избавиться, как бы сильно ты ни хотел. Джинни не раз писала у себя в дневнике о том, что просто не может без этой девчонки. Настолько они стали близки, что Уизли уже не знала, куда деться и как дышать, когда Кэти не было рядом. Созависимость? Наверное.. Джинн не знала, как правильно назвать это глупое сумасшествие, но и избавиться от него была не в сила…
custom 54224597251763963914custom 53570573289925145893custom 58506128386823366553custom 52604985786184750311custom 53592977815026043451
File, posted without a caption
🌟🌟🌟🔤ростояв так 🌟🌟🌟🌟еще пару 🌟🌟🌟🌟минут, Гарри 🌟🌟🌟🌟все же опустил рыжеволосую на пол и взяв за руку повел к другим. Сегодня в Норе явно решили устроить шумные посиделки. В этот уютный, немного сумасшедший дом съехались абсолютно все друзья семейства Уизли — казалось, Нора снова трещит по швам от количества гостей, но места, как всегда, хватило каждому. 🔤округ царил тот самый прекрасный уют, который бывает только зде…
custom 526049857861847503111custom 535753986856821847410custom 59358085529951332958custom 58506128386823366553custom 53592977815026043451custom 54224597251763963911
🤩ВНИМАНИЕ! Я НАПИСАЛА ЭТОТ ПОСТ ЛИШЬ ДЛЯ ТОГО, ЧТОБЫ СОЗРАНИТЬ КАНОН МОЕГО ПЕРСОНАЖА. ГИННИ НА МОЕМ ДНЕВНИКЕ БЫТЬ, ДАЖЕ В КАЧЕСТВЕ «БЫВШИХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ» ДЖИННИ.🤩 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️🔤етская ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️влюблённость ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️— это, пожалуй, самое чистое и светлое, что только есть на этом свете. Это то время, когда счастье измеряется перемазанными сладким мороженым пальцами, а весь мир сжимается до размеров одной скамейки во дворе, где в…
custom 59358085529951332958custom 53570573289925145897custom 58506128386823366556custom 54224597251763963912
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53575398685682184744custom 52604985786184750313custom 52602366156782028362
➖🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️⁉️ ➖🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟🌟 🅰️оября. 🔤не кажется, я окончательно схожу с ума. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🔤егодня около двух ночи я проснулась от странного ощущения, будто на меня кто-то смотрит. В темноте комнаты, в бледном свете я увидела его. Высокий силуэт с растрёпанными рыжими волосами. Это был Фред. 🔤ердце замерло, а потом заколотилось с такой силой, что в лёгких мгн…
custom 535753986856821847410custom 53570573289925145895custom 58506128386823366555custom 52604985786184750312custom 53592977815026043452custom 59358085529951332952custom 52602366156782028361custom 54224597251763963911
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Мой самый любимый и дорогой. Люблю его до безумия!! Я очень рада, что познакомилась с тобой и у нас получилась чудесная ветка. Тура, веди дв, я тебя ждала как фиг знает кого! 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Тренд вспомнила из тик тока, надеюсь вышло норм. Я ПОКА ФОТКИ ДЕЛАЛА ОФИГЕЛА. ЕМУ ЛИЦО ПОМЕНЯЛИ, А Я БУДТО ДНЕЙ 10 НЕ СПАЛА.
custom 53570573289925145899custom 58506128386823366557custom 52602366156782028366custom 59358085529951332953custom 53592977815026043452custom 52604985786184750311custom 54224597251763963911
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Я забыла идею, которую хотела, поэтому сделала вам это..Простите. Я знаю, что эт не оч, но и я не в ресурсе чот. Всех лав, вы все лучшие.
custom 526023661567820283613custom 526049857861847503112custom 535929778150260434510custom 54224597251763963913custom 53575398685682184742custom 58506128386823366552custom 53570573289925145891custom 59358085529951332951
File, posted without a caption
custom 58506128386823366557custom 54224597251763963915custom 59358085529951332955
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @f0XWeAs1EY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 128,694 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑭𝑶𝑿 𝑾𝑬𝑨𝑺𝑳𝑬𝒀||𝙧𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙞𝙞𝙞” (@f0XWeAs1EY), 108 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/f0XWeAs1EY.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.